Author Topic: DT Review Madness (Read 13813 times)

dpimborough · « **Reply #25 on:** October 09, 2014, 16:35 »

And another thing these agencies need to remember they are doling out less than 50 cents in subs commisions.

They ain't paying for high art!!

DallasP · « **Reply #26 on:** October 09, 2014, 16:40 »

I don't think I've had a rejection from dt for a long time

fritz · « **Reply #27 on:** October 09, 2014, 16:42 »

Drop them couple of years ago! I see no point to upload and 90% to be rejected (similar policy)?

Mantis · « **Reply #28 on:** October 09, 2014, 19:14 »

I stopped even trying to do similar submissions and my acceptance rate is almost 100% now. Interestingly, as my acceptance rate slowly goes up my sales reciprocate and slowly go down.

lephotography · « **Reply #29 on:** November 11, 2014, 23:07 »

I know everyone hates whiners... but....I have been on DT since 2006. I don't know what is wrong with reviewing lately but if you have the same model ( in different clothing doing different poses) more than 2-3 times they reject for similarities. I got rejected very beautiful images of waterfalls and lakes and mountains in colorado because "this is well covered already". I got several rejected for that reason.. so I went on DT boards saying please make it public what you have too many of so I am not wasting my time trying to get a great shot on something that has no chance of being uploaded.. They closed the thread and erased my comment. My husband told me they would do that before I left the comment because it is negative.
He got a reject for his image being so good that he needs to upload more images in a group like that image. Who has ever heard of that reject? I hate getting rejects saying I have too many of that subject when I only uploaded 2-3. Really?
I also asked if their reviewers had quality control and were checked on for improvement because obviously some reviewers do not like anything religious.. those images always get rejects no matter what they are... If it is a good image.. accept it right? Ive had things rejected... reloaded it.. . it was accepted.. for it to sell in a matter of a few days. None of their reviewers are trained the same to look for and what not to reject. I was a reviewer for about 4 years for a couple of microstock companies and I know how it works.
Just had to vent.... sorry

PixelBytes · « **Reply #30 on:** November 12, 2014, 00:30 »

Quote from: lephotography on November 11, 2014, 23:07

I know everyone hates whiners... but....I have been on DT since 2006. I don't know what is wrong with reviewing lately but if you have the same model ( in different clothing doing different poses) more than 2-3 times they reject for similarities. I got rejected very beautiful images of waterfalls and lakes and mountains in colorado because "this is well covered already". I got several rejected for that reason.. so I went on DT boards saying please make it public what you have too many of so I am not wasting my time trying to get a great shot on something that has no chance of being uploaded.. They closed the thread and erased my comment. My husband told me they would do that before I left the comment because it is negative.
He got a reject for his image being so good that he needs to upload more images in a group like that image. Who has ever heard of that reject? I hate getting rejects saying I have too many of that subject when I only uploaded 2-3. Really?
I also asked if their reviewers had quality control and were checked on for improvement because obviously some reviewers do not like anything religious.. those images always get rejects no matter what they are... If it is a good image.. accept it right? Ive had things rejected... reloaded it.. . it was accepted.. for it to sell in a matter of a few days. None of their reviewers are trained the same to look for and what not to reject. I was a reviewer for about 4 years for a couple of microstock companies and I know how it works.
Just had to vent.... sorry

Sounds like something is up with reviewers there for sure. Just noticed a thread on DT where somebody had a batch rejected for same model releases that they been using for years.

I haven't been uploading there much myself due to low sales so can't complain about rejections, but at least you know you aren't the only one getting them.

lephotography · « **Reply #31 on:** December 05, 2014, 13:00 »

Dear Dreamstime reviewers, I too was a reviewer for several years and do know what it's like to review pictures all day long. I know you get tired and sometimes hangry. Please don't take it out on us submitting images. Similarities means images alike. Not that you have fall leaves on a tree an another in studio on white background. I'm really not sure how you felt about my fall leaves because I have two images not alike at all and are sellable.

lephotography · « **Reply #32 on:** December 05, 2014, 15:32 »

Did you know, maybe you've experienced it... If you go to Dreamstime forum and ask why something was rejected with out good reason, they will delete your post? Not sure how that is helping anyone if you can not ask anything about it....

cuppacoffee · « **Reply #33 on:** December 05, 2014, 18:55 »

Since day one there the rule is that no rejections can be asked about in the forums. It has always applied to everyone. Their answer is to contact support with the image ID and the reviewer will get back to you with more specifics. No one gets through with a request for rejection clarification. That's just the way they roll.

CatTheCat · « **Reply #34 on:** December 05, 2014, 23:44 »

They rejected images that are among my most popular on shutterstock, that sell 1-2 times everyday. Rejected for 'too niche'.
They deserve to fall.

suzbah · « **Reply #35 on:** January 06, 2015, 12:21 »

Quote

We're sorry to have rejected the whole of your recent batch, as the majority of it was either duplicates or close similars to images already online. We'd like to believe it was an upload mistake, that's why we cannot afford to allocate our reviewers' time to check the whole corrupted batch in detail. Before uploading your next series, make sure you are not abusing our upload policy. Please note this approach is considered database spamming and can lead to account suspension.

Yeah thats what i got today. My whole batch (about 35 images) was rejected with the same reason. There were a few similar ones but most of them were different subjects. I wont bother to upload next time, waste of time!

ruigsantos · « **Reply #36 on:** August 07, 2015, 05:24 »

Same here! LOTS of rejections mostly for the images being similar (even vaguely) to other images I have online. But that's not the only reason. Today I had this one too:

"For all nude images (body parts or whole) you must attach a model release + an official ID document of the model (ID card, passport, driver's license)."

The image they are rejecting is the classic "woman holding orange next to her thighs", it's model released and it's a closeup of her thighs and bottom and she's wearing a thong. They want an ID card for this?! Really?!

Microstockphoto · « **Reply #37 on:** August 07, 2015, 05:43 »

Quote from: ruigsantos on August 07, 2015, 05:24

Same here! LOTS of rejections mostly for the images being similar (even vaguely) to other images I have online. But that's not the only reason. Today I had this one too:

"For all nude images (body parts or whole) you must attach a model release + an official ID document of the model (ID card, passport, driver's license)."

The image they are rejecting is the classic "woman holding orange next to her thighs", it's model released and it's a closeup of her thighs and bottom and she's wearing a thong. They want an ID card for this?! Really?!

Agencies link all images of the same model by use of the MR. In the image you describe she might not be recognisable, but in other images of her you may have, where she is eating the orange for example, she will be recognisable. I guess they want to CYA and have an ID just to be sure.

(When I shoot the same model nude or in clothes I use 2 separate MRs. That way the nude photos of the same model remain kind of anonymous (I shoot nude from the neck down)).

ruigsantos · « **Reply #38 on:** August 07, 2015, 06:14 »

Quote from: Microstockphoto on August 07, 2015, 05:43

Agencies link all images of the same model by use of the MR. In the image you describe she might not be recognisable, but in other images of her you may have, where she is eating the orange for example, she will be recognisable. I guess they want to CYA and have an ID just to be sure.

This is a good point. I hadn't thought about that. Thanks for the input.

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: DT Review Madness (Read 13813 times)

dpimborough

DallasP

fritz

Mantis

lephotography

PixelBytes

lephotography

lephotography

cuppacoffee

CatTheCat

suzbah

ruigsantos

Microstockphoto

ruigsantos

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors