pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: DT subs model  (Read 21164 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

« on: February 25, 2008, 19:05 »
0
Does anyone have anything to add to the discussion?

http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_9336

Regards,
Adelaide


« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2008, 19:19 »
0
I'm totally agree with your thoughts on this Madelaide, but unfortunately DT treats such threads with an iron fist.

Anyone want to guess how many posts it will be before the thread on DT is locked?

I will guess that it will be locked once DT gets up in the morning.

« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2008, 21:11 »
0
Anyone want to guess how many posts it will be before the thread on DT is locked?
Well, it's been there for two days already.

I guess some locks occur when people lose temper.  If you followed the MB thread a while ago (I think I also started this), some people got really out of her minds arguing with DT.

Regards,
Adelaide

« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2008, 22:20 »
0
My subscription sales at DT have increased a lot in February, and average earnings per sale has gone down to 0.94 from 1.14 and 1.22 in December and January. I don't like this at all.

« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2008, 04:47 »
0
I will guess that it will be locked once DT gets up in the morning.
Yes, they closed it around 10am CET. What we can conclude from this is that Nikutu is not an early riser.  ;)

On topic: the subs might take your average per image down, but make your total rise. As Serban argued in another thread, subs are a different market and there is no indication at all an image on sub would be bought on per image sale for a higher price. Since sub images seem to be downloaded for comps and most aren't actually used, it's a good suggestion to exclude the larger sizes from sub sales.
« Last Edit: February 26, 2008, 04:53 by FlemishDreams »

« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2008, 05:00 »
0
All my files are downsized to minimum at all sites that propose subscriptions. I opted out at StockXpert. Paying $0.25-0.30 for high resolution file is a joke.

« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2008, 21:05 »
0
Since sub images seem to be downloaded for comps and most aren't actually used, it's a good suggestion to exclude the larger sizes from sub sales.

You mean they download the sub for comp, then throw it away and buy the photo for full price when they're actually going to use it? I know some weird designers, but no, I don't think so.

Designers download images that they need, or images that they think they'll need in the future. Large advertising agencies can save huge amounts by utilizing their subs quota to the fullest. If there were no subs, they would have to pay a higher price.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2008, 13:33 by epixx »

« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2008, 02:47 »
0
I will guess that it will be locked once DT gets up in the morning.
Since sub images seem to be downloaded for comps and most aren't actually used, it's a good suggestion to exclude the larger sizes from sub sales.

Hi Hugo,

I find this a bizar statement.. why..?..

If the subs are used for comp mostly, than why are 95 % of my subs sales maximum size.?..
No no and no, subs are for every use.

Patrick.

« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2008, 17:23 »
0
As Serban argued in another thread, subs are a different market and there is no indication at all an image on sub would be bought on per image sale for a higher price.

Yes, but I would be ok NOT having a subs sale knowing that someone got a real sale for an image that will be actually used. I think it is an absurd that a buyer may get so many images for so little, it doesn't matter if he'll use them or not. 

Regards,
Adelaide

« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2008, 20:11 »
0
Adelaide,
The forum-* are really active at DT these days. Both your and another thread about the theme appear to have be removed completely.

I made a couple of points in the other thread, particularly about vectors. The two last dl's of one of my most popular vectors there have been subs. A normal dl of those generate a profit of $5.00. That's 16 times more than a sub (and sometimes the subs go even cheaper, my record the last week is $0.21).

The interesting aspect about that, apart from the low price, is that my vectors are very unlikely to be used as comps, since they are mostly garments used for testing out colours and logos for promotional clothing. In other words: my loss of 94% is absolute and irrevocable, and the gain for the customer likewise. By downloading less than 10 vectors, he has already received value corresponding to his complete monthly fee, while the creator receives between 5 and 10% of what he would usually get. Still, the customer can download 290 more images, creating a very healthy image archive for future use.

For DT, the risk is zilch. Even with customers who download their full quota, their loss is only a maximum of $0.01. Very few customers probably do download all, since the advantage of having a subscription is so enormous. And for every not downloaded image, DT earns another 30 cents. Tick tack, tick tack, tick tack.....

« Reply #10 on: March 06, 2008, 15:26 »
0
I just came from the DT forums and yes it seems as if threads about their Subscription model are locked rather quickly.  Personally, I really like the suggestion about limiting the size and/or charging multiple units for downloads of higher size/higher level images.  Or if they don't do that, introducing an opt out would be great, particularly for exclusive images.

vonkara

« Reply #11 on: March 06, 2008, 17:03 »
0
You are brave Adeleine to have started a such tread on DT :o Rule #1 on DT forum: Dreamstime is the best agency in the world :)

« Reply #12 on: March 06, 2008, 18:01 »
0
I like DT.  I think they try to be professional and fair.

However the subs thing is undermining people's enthusiasm - most people think that subs make the agency money at the expense of the photographer.

My one criticism of DT is its constant rain of press releases that claim it 'pays the highest commissions to photographers'.  That claim might indeed be correct for credit sales, but conveniently overlooks the dilution effect of subs.

« Reply #13 on: March 06, 2008, 19:04 »
0
I was disappointed with DT closing the thread since there was no agression towards the site, just suggestions.

They could even pay 100% commission in subs sales, they're still too cheap for the buyer.  Unnecessarily too cheap. 

Regards,
Adelaide

« Reply #14 on: March 15, 2008, 20:58 »
0
DT seem to be very sensitive about anyone discussing the subscription-sales issue on their forum.  Seems to be a very raw and exposed nerve with them.  Whyever so?????????  Why should it be such a sensitive topic that they would need to close so many threads about it????????   I guess if you want to discuss anything about DT's subs you just have to search their forums as they tell you to, where it has been discussed so many times.  And there you are supposed to find your answers.  (I haven't found any answers there but I'm still searching....)
Well, I can't complain too much about DT's early sales, as at first they were pretty good.  Lately, though, they're really sinking lower and lower for me every month.  I've decided that unless they give us an opt-out for subs, I'm dropping them as soon as my lock-in period is over.  I sure hope a lot of other contributors do as well.   And once again, many kudos to StockXpert for making their sub program optional.  I think by now they've heard the undeniable voice of their contributors.

« Reply #15 on: March 16, 2008, 03:18 »
0
DT seem to be very sensitive about anyone discussing the subscription-sales issue on their forum.  Seems to be a very raw and exposed nerve with them.  Whyever so?????????  Why should it be such a sensitive topic that they would need to close so many threads about it????????   I guess if you want to discuss anything about DT's subs you just have to search their forums as they tell you to, where it has been discussed so many times.  And there you are supposed to find your answers.  (I haven't found any answers there but I'm still searching....)
Well, I can't complain too much about DT's early sales, as at first they were pretty good.  Lately, though, they're really sinking lower and lower for me every month.  I've decided that unless they give us an opt-out for subs, I'm dropping them as soon as my lock-in period is over.  I sure hope a lot of other contributors do as well.   And once again, many kudos to StockXpert for making their sub program optional.  I think by now they've heard the undeniable voice of their contributors.

Isn't it obvious why the won't have any discussions about subs? It generates a big profit for DT, and a very low profit for the photographer. My subscriptions sales at DT are going up, particularly for vectors, which usually generate a $4.00+ commission, and my profits there seem to go down. Not so strange really, when subs pay a fraction of the price of regular downloads.

« Reply #16 on: March 16, 2008, 06:45 »
0
I have about $ 300 a monthly incomes from dreams time, and definitely im going to close my account there, soonest i can, but i have to wait until may, because of their rules of keeping images for 6 month. They are on market longer than fotolia and stockxpert but  they been overtaken by both in terms of incomes and traffic. Owning to the actions of the owners they are not going to grow fast enough to stay in race like serious player.

« Reply #17 on: March 16, 2008, 07:23 »
0
Agreed.  I hate to see them falling behind, but they seem to be plugging their ears to their contributors, at least on this issue.  Hopefully they'll listen soon.  Buyers are important, but without good-quality contributors, the buyers will eventually go elsewhere.

« Reply #18 on: March 16, 2008, 13:35 »
0
So do you think many people are giving up DT because of their subs model?  The recent poll did not clarify the matter much for me.

Like in StockXpert, DT subs sales are not very significant to me, but in StockXpert I was able to notice that L/XL/XXL credit sales seem to have disappeared.

Regards,
Adelaide

« Reply #19 on: March 16, 2008, 14:23 »
0
but i have to wait until may, because of their rules of keeping images for 6 month.

Have you tried emailing them and asking them to let you go early? It would surely be against their reputation to keep you against your will. Whatever any actual rules. I can't believe that they would do that - it would be so old fashioned and pointless.

The web way of doing business is that you keep your customers and contributors because the relationship works for everyone. It's about you all liking each other. Companies that don't do it like - well they don't get it IMO.

Is Dreamstime a US company in any sense?

« Reply #20 on: March 17, 2008, 00:46 »
0
So do you think many people are giving up DT because of their subs model?  The recent poll did not clarify the matter much for me.

Like in StockXpert, DT subs sales are not very significant to me, but in StockXpert I was able to notice that L/XL/XXL credit sales seem to have disappeared.

Regards,
Adelaide


Nothing happens overnight, but what I see is that, when I look at my income, DT and StockXpert are sinking and FT, IS and BS are rising. SS is increasing too, but not nearly as much as the three mentioned. Will I bail out? If it's not economically viable to stay, yes, but that may take time.

« Reply #21 on: March 17, 2008, 02:54 »
0
but i have to wait until may, because of their rules of keeping images for 6 month.

Have you tried emailing them and asking them to let you go early? It would surely be against their reputation to keep you against your will. Whatever any actual rules. I can't believe that they would do that - it would be so old fashioned and pointless.

The web way of doing business is that you keep your customers and contributors because the relationship works for everyone. It's about you all liking each other. Companies that don't do it like - well they don't get it IMO.

Is Dreamstime a US company in any sense?
I phone them for few times,  same answer,  yes you have to wait for 6 month
Dreamstime is Romanian company with one office based in US, but most employers are in Romania where they have head office

lisafx

« Reply #22 on: March 17, 2008, 11:59 »
0
I am really surprised to hear anyone wanting out of DT because of subscription sales.  They make up such a tiny portion of the overall earnings on the site, at least from my experience.  My per sale average there has been consistently over $1/DL since November and goes up a bit each month. 

Personally I think they are one of the most contributor friendly sites.  You really can't blame them for not wanting their forums littered with dozens of threads rehashing the same issue.  It has been discussed to death. 


« Reply #23 on: March 17, 2008, 13:04 »
0
I am really surprised to hear anyone wanting out of DT because of subscription sales.  They make up such a tiny portion of the overall earnings on the site, at least from my experience.  My per sale average there has been consistently over $1/DL since November and goes up a bit each month. 

My per DL average climbed well above $1 last autumn, and stayed there until January. In February and March, after the subs sales started to increase and dug into my vector sales, I'm down to $0.90 per DL.

« Reply #24 on: March 17, 2008, 14:30 »
0
I like DT.  I think they try to be professional and fair.


 tell me that's a joke, please. fair? changing a contract with 6months keeping photos that are uploaded a year ago?
 that's not fair. -that stinks.
 subscription downloads for the same images (which did not have that option in the time those wer uploaded?). - that's not fair - that stinks.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
20 Replies
9528 Views
Last post June 16, 2008, 00:33
by cphoto
17 Replies
6555 Views
Last post February 05, 2014, 00:45
by Jo Ann Snover
When do subs start

Started by Batman « 1 2 3 4  All » iStockPhoto.com

98 Replies
23124 Views
Last post April 14, 2014, 17:32
by nullornotset
72 Replies
13135 Views
Last post May 29, 2014, 19:52
by goober
12 Replies
4587 Views
Last post December 04, 2016, 13:11
by Dumc

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors