Agency Based Discussion > Dreamstime.com
Mother kissing daughter considered "inappropriate" on Dreamstime
Anyka:
Dreamstime is "cleaning up" their database again. This time I got two rejected images that were submitted many years ago (which is not a new thing at Dreamstime, I know).
What is new is the reason :
Both images show the most innocent mother's day scenes, shot during different photo sessions, of a 5-year old girl giving flowers to her own mother and kissing her mother.
No, there is not even a HINT in the direction of lesbian kissing or pedofile behaviour AT ALL.
Oh, and both people in the pictures are fully dressed.
What the h...??
Are they doing a AI search on the word "kissing + child" ??? And since when is kissing inappropriate?
Dreamstime explanation :
We are sorry to inform you that due to changes in Internet regulations, we can no longer keep online certain types of images that can be considered inappropriate or that can be open to interpretation.
Unfortunately, your image fits one of these categories and had to be removed. As this is a time sensitive matter, the thumbnail has also been removed and is no longer available.
Thank you for your understanding.
offisapup:
At this point in time, I wouldn't worry about any images being taken off a microstock site for whatever reason, least of all dreamstime. The puny rewards you get for keeping images on a port just don't make it worth stressing about.
Anyka:
--- Quote from: offisapup on May 18, 2022, 07:40 ---At this point in time, I wouldn't worry about any images being taken off a microstock site for whatever reason, least of all dreamstime. The puny rewards you get for keeping images on a port just don't make it worth stressing about.
--- End quote ---
I'm not worried at all, at least not about my images or my income from Dreamstime. I should rather worry about the state of mind of people who think it's necessary to delete a mother/daughter image because of a loving thank-you-kiss ...
Roscoe:
--- Quote from: Anyka on May 18, 2022, 08:37 ---I'm not worried at all, at least not about my images or my income from Dreamstime. I should rather worry about the state of mind of people who think it's necessary to delete a mother/daughter image because of a loving thank-you-kiss ...
--- End quote ---
I guess it's not a human action, but rather an automated action by a bot which suffers from sloppy programming, and was indeed triggered by your combination of keywords.
Uncle Pete:
--- Quote from: Anyka on May 18, 2022, 08:37 ---
--- Quote from: offisapup on May 18, 2022, 07:40 ---At this point in time, I wouldn't worry about any images being taken off a microstock site for whatever reason, least of all dreamstime. The puny rewards you get for keeping images on a port just don't make it worth stressing about.
--- End quote ---
I'm not worried at all, at least not about my images or my income from Dreamstime. I should rather worry about the state of mind of people who think it's necessary to delete a mother/daughter image because of a loving thank-you-kiss ...
--- End quote ---
Obviously it's inappropriate in the modern world for children to care for, love or respect their parents? ;D
--- Quote from: Roscoe on May 19, 2022, 02:19 ---
--- Quote from: Anyka on May 18, 2022, 08:37 ---I'm not worried at all, at least not about my images or my income from Dreamstime. I should rather worry about the state of mind of people who think it's necessary to delete a mother/daughter image because of a loving thank-you-kiss ...
--- End quote ---
I guess it's not a human action, but rather an automated action by a bot which suffers from sloppy programming, and was indeed triggered by your combination of keywords.
--- End quote ---
Better answer but I thought mine was at least absurdly reflective. BAD AI, sounds like the real answer.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version