MicrostockGroup

Microstock Footage Forum => Video Equipment / Sofware / Technique => Topic started by: grace on January 31, 2017, 20:28

Title: A6300
Post by: grace on January 31, 2017, 20:28
Hi everyone,is it worth to invest a6300 with 16-50mm for 4k footage?This mirrorless camera sometimes just bring for light travel for stock photos as well..I'm using nikon actually but sometimes just dont want to bring too heavy...thanks everyone
Title: Re: A6300
Post by: TSLphoto on January 31, 2017, 20:47
Does your current HD footage sell? If it does, it never hurts to shoot 4K to future proof your work as well as benefiting from the higher price tag on 4K footage.
Title: Re: A6300
Post by: grace on January 31, 2017, 21:07
Some of my HD footage sold,but not very good compare with stock photos...because i'm using D7000 to shoot previous footage,the quality not so good actually that why thinking whether want invest the a6300 or not...
Title: Re: A6300
Post by: increasingdifficulty on February 01, 2017, 06:30
The quality plays a very minor role compared to the content.
Title: Re: A6300
Post by: AMBTL on February 01, 2017, 15:54
a6500 could be a better choice.