pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Poll

What was your May 2008 Earnings per Image at FeaturePics?

$0.40 or higher
1 (4.2%)
$0.21 to $0.39
0 (0%)
$0.15 to $0.20
0 (0%)
$0.10 to $0.14
0 (0%)
$0.05 to $0.09
3 (12.5%)
$0.01 to $0.04
3 (12.5%)
Less than $0.01
17 (70.8%)

Total Members Voted: 22

Author Topic: May 2008 Earnings per Image at FeaturePics  (Read 4944 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DanP68

« on: June 02, 2008, 21:20 »
0
We are trying something a little different this month from the Earnings Ratings.  Let's measure the amount of earnings per image you received at this agency during the month.

This is a pretty simple calculation.  If you had $50 in earnings and 500 images online at FeaturePics, then you earned $0.10 per image ($50/500).

For simplicity you might want to use the # of images online at the start of May.

If you just joined the agency, you should probably abstain this month until you have a full month of earnings to measure.  If we get enough participation, we might be able to better compare the earnings power of our agencies.


« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2008, 21:46 »
0
I voted with my micro account - 1.3c.  But my mid-macro got me 16c - although it's not a steady monthly earning.

Regards,
Adelaide

« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2008, 22:14 »
0
It'd be interesting to see who's got 0.0000.  Besides me, that is.

« Reply #3 on: June 02, 2008, 22:37 »
0
LOL, I made 3 cents on FP in May.

« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2008, 09:20 »
0
No sales.

« Reply #5 on: June 03, 2008, 10:11 »
0
$0.00348 per photo !!  ;D

DanP68

« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2008, 10:44 »
0
It really is a shame.  Featurepics is run by good people.

« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2008, 11:42 »
0
Zilch

« Reply #8 on: June 03, 2008, 11:49 »
0
It really is a shame.  Featurepics is run by good people.

I agree 100%

« Reply #9 on: June 03, 2008, 12:23 »
0
You can't consider Featurepics as the other agencies as you can fix your price yourself and you are closer to a traditionnal agency there. Before Internet and the microstock explosion, according to stock photographers, it was the standard for stock agencies to bring 1$ per year per photo in average.

« Reply #10 on: June 03, 2008, 12:30 »
0
Somebody are apparently selling. In May, I had the sharp increase in referral incomes there.

I also agree with the above poster. FP looks more and more like a mid/combi stock operation, which means it will take more time.

« Reply #11 on: June 03, 2008, 12:50 »
0
0.0000000000

DanP68

« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2008, 23:24 »
0
Next month I will make "No Sales" an option for all of the polls, with the exception of the Big 4. If you don't have sales at the Big 4, then your portfolio is too small to be representative.

I was with Featurepics for 4 months or so, and never had a single sale.  On the other hand, I never promoted my portfolio.  I depended on the site to do my promotion and selling, which perhaps was not the best option.  But I don't have the inclination to start/promote my own site.  I'm too small a contributor at this point.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
19 Replies
5943 Views
Last post June 17, 2008, 17:21
by litifeta
30 Replies
6511 Views
Last post June 09, 2008, 03:04
by francisblack
0 Replies
2012 Views
Last post June 02, 2008, 17:40
by DanP68
0 Replies
1269 Views
Last post June 02, 2008, 17:48
by DanP68
0 Replies
1204 Views
Last post June 02, 2008, 17:54
by DanP68

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results