So I got Intellectual property refusal,  I removed all logos, If someone could explain what is protected here?

Maybe just an excuse reject reason for a bad photo?

My guess is the building in the background.  Did you use it's name in the keywords?

Probably the boat names or similar logos. You must share a full-resolution version to give you advice.

Quote from: SimonSays on November 04, 2025, 19:32
Maybe just an excuse reject reason for a bad photo?

+1
Sure, I guess that what is protected here by Adobe is storage space.

Quote from: microdisq on November 04, 2025, 13:57
So I got Intellectual property refusal,  I removed all logos, If someone could explain what is protected here?

Running person

Quote from: Hannafate on November 05, 2025, 15:27
My guess is the building in the background.  Did you use it's name in the keywords?

Yes I did write building names, the title was: "Budapest woman running by the river, Széchenyi chain bridge Hungarian Parliament Building".
Do you think I should just change the title probably?

Quote from: microdisq on November 05, 2025, 22:29

Quote from: Hannafate on November 05, 2025, 15:27
My guess is the building in the background.  Did you use it's name in the keywords?

Yes I did write building names, the title was: "Budapest woman running by the river, Széchenyi chain bridge Hungarian Parliament Building".
Do you think I should just change the title probably?

Changing title will not help You.Adobe is not accepting people without model release on editorial images.

Quote from: fotoroad on November 06, 2025, 00:55

Quote from: microdisq on November 05, 2025, 22:29

Quote from: Hannafate on November 05, 2025, 15:27
My guess is the building in the background.  Did you use it's name in the keywords?

Yes I did write building names, the title was: "Budapest woman running by the river, Széchenyi chain bridge Hungarian Parliament Building".
Do you think I should just change the title probably?

Changing title will not help You.Adobe is not accepting people without model release on editorial images.

My rule is: always learn by yourself.
Btw, Adobe rules are Artificially unintelligent.

https://stock.adobe.com/search?filters%5Bcontent_type%3Aphoto%5D=1&filters%5Bgentech%5D=exclude&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Aimage%5D=1&filters%5Billustrative%5D=include&order=relevance&limit=100&search_type=usertyped&search_page=1&k=walking&acp=&aco=walking&get_facets=1

you need a model release for all people in the picture, the person jogging, but also the ones that are further away if they are recognizable
you need to remove all logo's, brand names, or other registered trademarks.
Avoid naming the name of the buildings.

If you want to submit it editorially, different story, but Adobe has different rules. It's illustrative editorial, and recognizable people are not allowed in editorial shots at Adobe.

Quote from: fotoroad on November 06, 2025, 00:55

Quote from: microdisq on November 05, 2025, 22:29

Quote from: Hannafate on November 05, 2025, 15:27
My guess is the building in the background.  Did you use it's name in the keywords?

Yes I did write building names, the title was: "Budapest woman running by the river, Széchenyi chain bridge Hungarian Parliament Building".
Do you think I should just change the title probably?

Changing title will not help You.Adobe is not accepting people without model release on editorial images.

There is no problem if the people are unrecognizable. Here is a 100% zoom of a photo with unrecognizable people accepted today:

Quote from: Zero Talent on November 06, 2025, 14:40

Quote from: fotoroad on November 06, 2025, 00:55

Quote from: microdisq on November 05, 2025, 22:29

Quote from: Hannafate on November 05, 2025, 15:27
My guess is the building in the background.  Did you use it's name in the keywords?

Yes I did write building names, the title was: "Budapest woman running by the river, Széchenyi chain bridge Hungarian Parliament Building".
Do you think I should just change the title probably?

Changing title will not help You.Adobe is not accepting people without model release on editorial images.

There is no problem if the people are unrecognizable. Here is a 100% zoom of a photo with unrecognizable people accepted today:

It was Illustrative editorial image?

Quote from: fotoroad on November 06, 2025, 14:52

Quote from: Zero Talent on November 06, 2025, 14:40

Quote from: fotoroad on November 06, 2025, 00:55

Quote from: microdisq on November 05, 2025, 22:29

Quote from: Hannafate on November 05, 2025, 15:27
My guess is the building in the background.  Did you use it's name in the keywords?

Yes I did write building names, the title was: "Budapest woman running by the river, Széchenyi chain bridge Hungarian Parliament Building".
Do you think I should just change the title probably?

Changing title will not help You.Adobe is not accepting people without model release on editorial images.

There is no problem if the people are unrecognizable. Here is a 100% zoom of a photo with unrecognizable people accepted today:

It was Illustrative editorial image?

No. It is commercial. No restrictions. Photos with unrecognizable people can be commercial.

Quote from: Zero Talent on November 06, 2025, 16:07

Quote from: fotoroad on November 06, 2025, 14:52

Quote from: Zero Talent on November 06, 2025, 14:40

Quote from: fotoroad on November 06, 2025, 00:55

Quote from: microdisq on November 05, 2025, 22:29

Quote from: Hannafate on November 05, 2025, 15:27
My guess is the building in the background.  Did you use it's name in the keywords?

Yes I did write building names, the title was: "Budapest woman running by the river, Széchenyi chain bridge Hungarian Parliament Building".
Do you think I should just change the title probably?
Yes I agree, but his images looks illustrative editorial to me.Because very famous Hungarian bridge and building

Changing title will not help You.Adobe is not accepting people without model release on editorial images.

There is no problem if the people are unrecognizable. Here is a 100% zoom of a photo with unrecognizable people accepted today:

It was Illustrative editorial image?

No. It is commercial. No restrictions. Photos with unrecognizable people can be commercial.

Here's SS's known trademarks restrictions if its helpful to anyone:

https://submit.shutterstock.com/help/en/articles/10617432-known-restrictions-trademarks-and-other-intellectual-property

https://submit.shutterstock.com/help/en/articles/10617447-known-restrictions

https://submit.shutterstock.com/help/en/articles/10617431-known-restrictions-architectural-designs-and-private-land