Author Topic: Adobe Re-Reviews (Read 829 times)

Shuttershock · « **on:** September 15, 2024, 10:17 »

When you thought Adobe couldn’t get any lower due to the 10 week plus review durations and length of wait for payments they are re-reviewing existing content and removing it after previously approving it :-) I had an email today removing one image due to the re-reviews taking place. Wouldn't suprise me if they were spending more time removing mages than approving new images.

wds · « **Reply #1 on:** September 15, 2024, 13:37 »

Quote from: Shuttershock on September 15, 2024, 10:17

When you thought Adobe couldn’t get any lower due to the 10 week plus review durations and length of wait for payments they are re-reviewing existing content and removing it after previously approving it :-) I had an email today removing one image due to the re-reviews taking place. Wouldn't suprise me if they were spending more time removing mages than approving new images.

That sounds a bit scary. If you don't mind my asking, was it a technical issue or an intellectual property issue that cause them to remove an image?

DiscreetDuck · « **Reply #2 on:** September 15, 2024, 13:46 »

The new generation of employees or procedures at adobe: PITIFUL!, incompetence and incapacity, but self-confidence as high as mountains
We have entered the era of mediocrity.

zeljkok · « **Reply #3 on:** September 15, 2024, 14:17 »

Quote from: wds on September 15, 2024, 13:37

Quote from: Shuttershock on September 15, 2024, 10:17
When you thought Adobe couldn’t get any lower due to the 10 week plus review durations and length of wait for payments they are re-reviewing existing content and removing it after previously approving it :-) I had an email today removing one image due to the re-reviews taking place. Wouldn't suprise me if they were spending more time removing mages than approving new images.

That sounds a bit scary. If you don't mind my asking, was it a technical issue or an intellectual property issue that cause them to remove an image?

Very good question. I'd like to know the answer as well. If I had to take a guess, it would be intellectual property.

Shuttershock · « **Reply #4 on:** September 15, 2024, 14:59 »

Quote from: zeljkok on September 15, 2024, 14:17

Quote from: wds on September 15, 2024, 13:37
Quote from: Shuttershock on September 15, 2024, 10:17
When you thought Adobe couldn’t get any lower due to the 10 week plus review durations and length of wait for payments they are re-reviewing existing content and removing it after previously approving it :-) I had an email today removing one image due to the re-reviews taking place. Wouldn't suprise me if they were spending more time removing mages than approving new images.

That sounds a bit scary. If you don't mind my asking, was it a technical issue or an intellectual property issue that cause them to remove an image?

Very good question. I'd like to know the answer as well. If I had to take a guess, it would be intellectual property.

It is difficult to know “incompatible with terms” it stated with a link to their terms without saying which term. Photo of sports grounds.

WendyT · « **Reply #5 on:** September 15, 2024, 16:50 »

I had one removed a while back for that reason, but they didnt tell me which one fell foul of the "new" restrictions so I have no idea which one it is or what was wrong with it.

gnirtS · « **Reply #6 on:** September 15, 2024, 17:20 »

Could be like Shutterstock where policy changes around IP/private grounds or in response to someone like National Trust where they scan through the existing library looking for and removing specific locations, items or keywords.
It happens occasionally.

If its more than that and actual re-reviews id have to say "what".. They cant even review the first time in any sane timeframe currently yet along twice.

SuperPhoto · « **Reply #7 on:** September 16, 2024, 10:28 »

Eh, probably an automated process - they did send out an e-mail to the effect that they were reviewing previous images that were 'incompatible' - i.e., like referencing other artists names (i.e., 'vangogh'), using specific places (i.e., 'eiffel tower'), etc... quite possibly you referenced that in the title/keywords, hence it was removed...

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Adobe Re-Reviews (Read 829 times)

Shuttershock

wds

DiscreetDuck

zeljkok

Shuttershock

WendyT

gnirtS

SuperPhoto

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors