Author Topic: Adobe/FT 2.69 for a footage ? (Read 4541 times)

photog-teo · « **on:** November 28, 2016, 21:43 »

I dont get it , i sold the clip or the a still frame for 2.69 ?

sharpshot · « **Reply #1 on:** November 29, 2016, 02:58 »

FT sell for low prices, that's why I didn't upload footage there. I thought Adobe had higher minimum prices but I find the Adobe/FT thing confusing. They should kill off FT and just have Adobe.

increasingdifficulty · « **Reply #2 on:** November 29, 2016, 05:47 »

The lowest amount I've gotten for footage is €3.84 but that was just one time. It's almost always €17.50-28.

Dennis Radeke · « **Reply #3 on:** December 01, 2016, 08:34 »

Hi there, my name is Dennis Radeke and I am the Content Development Manager for for motion for Adobe Stock.

As you probably know, Adobe purchased Fotolia as a way to establish a strong presence in the stock content marketplace. Fotolia continues to have strong sales and is slightly different than Adobe Stock.

In the case of video, Adobe Stock currently offers two products to sell (4k, HD) and Fotolia offers five (4k, 1080, 720, 480, 240). The lower resolution and frame size comes with a lower cost.

If you received a lower royalty, then it is due to a smaller sized clip that was purchased. Ultimately, having the two marketplaces today offers our contributors two unique offerings in which to publish and promote their content.

I hope this helps!

cathyslife · « **Reply #4 on:** December 01, 2016, 11:16 »

Quote from: dradeke on December 01, 2016, 08:34

Hi there, my name is Dennis Radeke and I am the Content Development Manager for for motion for Adobe Stock.

As you probably know, Adobe purchased Fotolia as a way to establish a strong presence in the stock content marketplace. Fotolia continues to have strong sales and is slightly different than Adobe Stock.

In the case of video, Adobe Stock currently offers two products to sell (4k, HD) and Fotolia offers five (4k, 1080, 720, 480, 240). The lower resolution and frame size comes with a lower cost.

If you received a lower royalty, then it is due to a smaller sized clip that was purchased. Ultimately, having the two marketplaces today offers our contributors two unique offerings in which to publish and promote their content.

I hope this helps!

You should ask Leaf for a Verified stamp so we know that you are actually an Adobe Stock representative. A whole lot of people here don't bother posting under their own name, so it is difficult to tell whether someone is who they say they are.

But your explanation makes perfect sense!

trucic · « **Reply #6 on:** December 01, 2016, 14:57 »

Hi Dennis,
thanks for the info provided... if possible, it will be nice to see Extended and 4K prices divided, not same in both cases (availability for higher priced X license)... just keep doing what you started and you are heading to right direction.. Best regards!

cathyslife · « **Reply #7 on:** December 01, 2016, 15:49 »

Quote from: MatHayward on December 01, 2016, 14:49

Quote from: cathyslife on December 01, 2016, 11:16
Quote from: dradeke on December 01, 2016, 08:34
Hi there, my name is Dennis Radeke and I am the Content Development Manager for for motion for Adobe Stock.

As you probably know, Adobe purchased Fotolia as a way to establish a strong presence in the stock content marketplace. Fotolia continues to have strong sales and is slightly different than Adobe Stock.

In the case of video, Adobe Stock currently offers two products to sell (4k, HD) and Fotolia offers five (4k, 1080, 720, 480, 240). The lower resolution and frame size comes with a lower cost.

If you received a lower royalty, then it is due to a smaller sized clip that was purchased. Ultimately, having the two marketplaces today offers our contributors two unique offerings in which to publish and promote their content.

I hope this helps!

You should ask Leaf for a Verified stamp so we know that you are actually an Adobe Stock representative. A whole lot of people here don't bother posting under their own name, so it is difficult to tell whether someone is who they say they are.

But your explanation makes perfect sense!

I can vouch for him Cathy...Dennis is the real deal and he is working very hard to make contributing video content to Adobe Stock a successful endeavor for everyone.

-Mat

Glad to hear it, figured he was, but you just never know here.

Dodie · « **Reply #8 on:** December 05, 2016, 08:44 »

Quote from: cathyslife on December 01, 2016, 11:16

You should ask Leaf for a Verified stamp so we know that you are actually an Adobe Stock representative. A whole lot of people here don't bother posting under their own name, so it is difficult to tell whether someone is who they say they are.

But your explanation makes perfect sense!

The same thing was asked from Mat too when he first posted here.

I never understood why Adobe/FT doesn't use it's own official forum for announcements, so these kind of (legitimate) doubts could never occur and/or hurt anyone. The info could still be replicated here as well.

spike · « **Reply #9 on:** December 05, 2016, 12:40 »

Quote from: trucic on December 01, 2016, 14:57

Hi Dennis,
thanks for the info provided... if possible, it will be nice to see Extended and 4K prices divided, not same in both cases (availability for higher priced X license)... just keep doing what you started and you are heading to right direction.. Best regards!

This!

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Adobe/FT 2.69 for a footage ? (Read 4541 times)

photog-teo

sharpshot

increasingdifficulty

Dennis Radeke

cathyslife

MatHayward

trucic

cathyslife

Dodie

spike

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors