MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Adobestock Review Time  (Read 15759 times)

2 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

« Reply #125 on: September 09, 2024, 08:42 »
0
Deletion of uploaded files is treated same as file rejection and effects on your stats and sales.

If that is the case with deleting stuck files, then the effect would be negated when re-uploading them back into the queue?

Of course NOT.
if you upload 1000 images your upload counter will state that you have 1000 uploads.
And if you delete 100 and  then upload those 100 again, your counter will state that you have 1100 uploads and 100 deleted / rejected images.
It is a basic math.


« Reply #126 on: September 09, 2024, 10:08 »
+2
Deletion of uploaded files is treated same as file rejection and effects on your stats and sales.

If that is the case with deleting stuck files, then the effect would be negated when re-uploading them back into the queue?

Of course NOT.
if you upload 1000 images your upload counter will state that you have 1000 uploads.
And if you delete 100 and  then upload those 100 again, your counter will state that you have 1100 uploads and 100 deleted / rejected images.
It is a basic math.


I don't necessarily want to say that your statement is not true. But I find it somehow illogical.
Do you have a link where I can read your information?
I'm not even sure whether rejected images affect the ranking. My personal experience in this regard is different.

Uncle Pete

  • Great Place by a Great Lake - My Home Port
« Reply #127 on: September 09, 2024, 11:21 »
0
Deletion of uploaded files is treated same as file rejection and effects on your stats and sales.

If that is the case with deleting stuck files, then the effect would be negated when re-uploading them back into the queue?

Of course NOT.
if you upload 1000 images your upload counter will state that you have 1000 uploads.
And if you delete 100 and  then upload those 100 again, your counter will state that you have 1100 uploads and 100 deleted / rejected images.
It is a basic math.


I don't necessarily want to say that your statement is not true. But I find it somehow illogical.
Do you have a link where I can read your information?
I'm not even sure whether rejected images affect the ranking. My personal experience in this regard is different.

I'm having difficulty finding my acceptance ratio. Is that listed for my account? If the idea that uploads vs accepted, totally ignored uploads that were deleted, maybe?

As far as what Adobe has told us in the two webinars and other places, images are ranked by their activity during the images first 30 days. No where does anything tell us that accounts or artists are ranked.

Position is flexible and always changing, relative to everyone else's position. It's not rank or fixed. It's a floating position. If I get a sudden burst of DLs, I'll move up. If I have a dead period, I'll go down, as long as others had more DLs during the same week. There's nothing to say that uploads and accepted or total numbers have anything to do with position.

« Reply #128 on: September 09, 2024, 11:40 »
+1
Deletion of uploaded files is treated same as file rejection and effects on your stats and sales.

If that is the case with deleting stuck files, then the effect would be negated when re-uploading them back into the queue?

Of course NOT.
if you upload 1000 images your upload counter will state that you have 1000 uploads.
And if you delete 100 and  then upload those 100 again, your counter will state that you have 1100 uploads and 100 deleted / rejected images.
It is a basic math.


I don't necessarily want to say that your statement is not true. But I find it somehow illogical.
Do you have a link where I can read your information?
I'm not even sure whether rejected images affect the ranking. My personal experience in this regard is different.

I'm having difficulty finding my acceptance ratio. Is that listed for my account? If the idea that uploads vs accepted, totally ignored uploads that were deleted, maybe?

As far as what Adobe has told us in the two webinars and other places, images are ranked by their activity during the images first 30 days. No where does anything tell us that accounts or artists are ranked.

Position is flexible and always changing, relative to everyone else's position. It's not rank or fixed. It's a floating position. If I get a sudden burst of DLs, I'll move up. If I have a dead period, I'll go down, as long as others had more DLs during the same week. There's nothing to say that uploads and accepted or total numbers have anything to do with position.

Pete, you don't have to explain that to me. I see it the same way you do.
However, it's all a black box.
If someone has additional information, that's ok. But if someone make assertions here, then he should be able to back them up somehow.

zeljkok

  • Non Linear Existence
« Reply #129 on: September 09, 2024, 15:03 »
0
Honestly people, do not delete and resubmit.   You are only going to waste time and get frustrated. 
It is obvious Adobe does not want new content unless it's editorial or AI.   It's their right.  But there should be professional courtesy to say that.

« Reply #130 on: September 09, 2024, 16:39 »
0
Deletion of uploaded files is treated same as file rejection and effects on your stats and sales.

If that is the case with deleting stuck files, then the effect would be negated when re-uploading them back into the queue?

Of course NOT.
if you upload 1000 images your upload counter will state that you have 1000 uploads.
And if you delete 100 and  then upload those 100 again, your counter will state that you have 1100 uploads and 100 deleted / rejected images.
It is a basic math.


I don't necessarily want to say that your statement is not true. But I find it somehow illogical.
Do you have a link where I can read your information?
I'm not even sure whether rejected images affect the ranking. My personal experience in this regard is different.

I'm having difficulty finding my acceptance ratio. Is that listed for my account? If the idea that uploads vs accepted, totally ignored uploads that were deleted, maybe?

As far as what Adobe has told us in the two webinars and other places, images are ranked by their activity during the images first 30 days. No where does anything tell us that accounts or artists are ranked.

Position is flexible and always changing, relative to everyone else's position. It's not rank or fixed. It's a floating position. If I get a sudden burst of DLs, I'll move up. If I have a dead period, I'll go down, as long as others had more DLs during the same week. There's nothing to say that uploads and accepted or total numbers have anything to do with position.

Pete, you don't have to explain that to me. I see it the same way you do.
However, it's all a black box.
If someone has additional information, that's ok. But if someone make assertions here, then he should be able to back them up somehow.

That information was already explained here on forum.
In one of those previous topics about adobe upload and review time and how uploaded files are not affected by time of upload but by time of approval.
I'm sorry but I don't have time to surf trough thousand posts just to insure you two.
With all due respect, either you think that I'm wrong or not it doesn't change what I have read here some time ago.

« Reply #131 on: September 09, 2024, 16:43 »
0
Honestly people, do not delete and resubmit.   You are only going to waste time and get frustrated. 
It is obvious Adobe does not want new content unless it's editorial or AI.   It's their right.  But there should be professional courtesy to say that.


Please check your PM.
 

« Reply #132 on: September 09, 2024, 17:08 »
+1

That information was already explained here on forum.
In one of those previous topics about adobe upload and review time and how uploaded files are not affected by time of upload but by time of approval.
I'm sorry but I don't have time to surf trough thousand posts just to insure you two.
With all due respect, either you think that I'm wrong or not it doesn't change what I have read here some time ago.

So somewhere, sometime, somehow, you read something from someone and are selling it here as fact.

Thank you for giving me your very valuable time here. But that wasn't really helpful.
 
« Last Edit: September 09, 2024, 17:13 by RalfLiebhold »

« Reply #133 on: September 09, 2024, 19:20 »
+1
In this forum on March 4, 2024, in response to the question "Does your % acceptance on Adobestock affect how much your images are seen?", Mat Hayward from Adobe Stock responded "No."

« Reply #134 on: September 10, 2024, 00:17 »
0
In this forum on March 4, 2024, in response to the question "Does your % acceptance on Adobestock affect how much your images are seen?", Mat Hayward from Adobe Stock responded "No."

Thank you very much for sharing this.
But your quotation explained  "how much your images are seen" , not your stats and with that your Adobe contributor position.
Anyhow, maybe I was wrong about what I said in previous posts. 
And maybe not.

« Reply #135 on: September 10, 2024, 09:02 »
+1
But your quotation explained  "how much your images are seen" , not your stats and with that your Adobe contributor position.

Why should we care about our stats and our Adobe contributor position, unless they influence the search position of our images, or in other words, how much our images are seen?

« Reply #136 on: September 10, 2024, 11:28 »
0
It seems that some people are getting images reviewed and others seem to get buried never to be seen again, I am wondering if it is worth deleting images and resubmitting them to get them back up the top of the Q?
What about deleting already approved images?
It has worked for me on a handful of occasions in the past to resubmit the stuck files and they have been reviewed more quickly. But there is no need to delete the older ones first, you can delete them if the newer ones get reviewed. Otherwise I would leave the older ones there in case they get reviewed first, and then I would delete the newer ones.

Deletion of uploaded files is treated same as file rejection and effects on your stats and sales.

« Reply #137 on: September 10, 2024, 17:12 »
0
But your quotation explained  "how much your images are seen" , not your stats and with that your Adobe contributor position.

Why should we care about our stats and our Adobe contributor position, unless they influence the search position of our images, or in other words, how much our images are seen?

In that specific post Mat was explaining that images are positioned by time that they are reviewed only if you / buyer select images/vectors/illustrations/videos to be sorted by the time of upload.
 

« Reply #138 on: September 11, 2024, 02:40 »
0
Faith and pray, is always touching.

The sheeps were afraid of the wolf, but it was their keeper who ate them  ;)

« Reply #139 on: September 11, 2024, 06:06 »
+1
So anyway, talking about review times, in Adobe Stock VP Matt Smith's blog post today, apart from all the exciting news about the Firefly bonus, it is stated that Adobe Stock has tripled their review team. https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2024/09/10/adobe-stock-continued-commitments-to-creators?mkt_tok=MjY5LVlORy02MDEAAAGVe6sGL36SIBLPeaQJyJbrgxJcF0hNzqHp1fq7_rJCniTtSx9sXA7Z2nUzCE-w8SNPD6yxc0388Kq5-l7KBSsrLbcofFm_7dclInqdMig

Adobe outsources content moderation to a Serbian company, Mod381, but with the tripling in moderation, is content moderation being spread amongst multiple providers, some of whom are tasked with moderating AI generated content and others with moderating non-AI content? Are some of these providers more streamlined in their processes which is why review time are so skewed at present? (All these questions are rhetorical, because I'm not expecting anyone here to have the answer ofc!)

« Reply #140 on: September 11, 2024, 23:08 »
+2
So anyway, talking about review times, in Adobe Stock VP Matt Smith's blog post today, apart from all the exciting news about the Firefly bonus, it is stated that Adobe Stock has tripled their review team.
The images in my review queue beg to disagree.

« Reply #141 on: September 11, 2024, 23:54 »
+1
Finally.  :o
It took more than 8 weeks to review uploaded images, but it seems that Adobe started to moderate something that is not AI.

« Reply #142 on: September 12, 2024, 00:11 »
+3
Finally.  :o
It took more than 8 weeks to review uploaded images, but it seems that Adobe started to moderate something that is not AI.

Congrats! Now hopefully they will start on everyone elses (fingers crossed)  ;)

zeljkok

  • Non Linear Existence
« Reply #143 on: September 12, 2024, 15:37 »
+2
Finally.  :o
It took more than 8 weeks to review uploaded images, but it seems that Adobe started to moderate something that is not AI.

Congrats.  At least someone got a review.  Closing in on 50 days wait here, still  nothing.

f8

« Reply #144 on: September 13, 2024, 14:50 »
+4
Adobe Review Time: Non-Existing.

Do they even review anymore? Are they even accepting new content? Should we continue to upload content?

Some sort of communication would go a long way.

« Reply #145 on: September 13, 2024, 16:39 »
+5
Good news. The photos I uploaded on June 27th have now been accepted. (I uploaded them to other stock sites the same day, I have images that sold 10 times before Adobe reviewed them).

The oldest post waiting for review is 17 days old. The total number of images waiting is 277.

« Reply #146 on: September 14, 2024, 22:05 »
+3
Calling Adobe Wan Kenobi

Calling Adobe Wan Kenobi!!

Please use The Force to transport our photos through to the review stage..

Thank yoo Adobe Wan Kenobi! 

« Reply #147 on: September 15, 2024, 17:23 »
0
First time im seeing the delays on my own stuff but it seems to depend on the type of image.
In a batch submitted with a few random topics (im clearing a backlog), some topics seem to be done in a few days, others seem to be several weeks and counting.
Its almost as if some keywords or types get selected for more detailed or human reviews and join a long queue whereas others without that get waved through quickly enough.

(FWIW my QA acceptance rate is just over 96% lifetime on the portfolio so not sure its that).

« Reply #148 on: September 15, 2024, 23:56 »
0
Illustrations submitted yesterday are approved ......but those which pending for more than few weeks / month are not.  :o

I really can't figure out how this is even possible ?
Shouldn't there be
some kind of time or upload order effect on review time, something like first uploaded-first reviewed  ?

« Reply #149 on: September 16, 2024, 01:31 »
0
So anyway, talking about review times, in Adobe Stock VP Matt Smith's blog post today, apart from all the exciting news about the Firefly bonus, it is stated that Adobe Stock has tripled their review team.
The images in my review queue beg to disagree.

Maybe the reviewers are still in training? There is a lot to learn, it is not like they just put you on the live queue without giving you a solid background.

I see this as a major commitment by Adobe to selling stock media. They would not be making this investment if they thought customers would all switch to ai and stop buying stock.

This looks like they expect a much stronger and growing demand from their customer base.

Probably also based on their projections for overall growth, the way Photoshop is integrating ai, now also in their video software, is certainly bringing them more clients.

More people plugged into Adobe means more customers for us.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
30 Replies
20403 Views
Last post March 19, 2007, 05:06
by Karimala
10 Replies
6770 Views
Last post October 16, 2008, 23:18
by alex123rf
21 Replies
12555 Views
Last post June 14, 2012, 15:03
by m@m
4 Replies
3406 Views
Last post May 18, 2016, 14:11
by jgolby
46 Replies
6020 Views
Last post March 17, 2024, 22:43
by jasonlee3071

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors