MicrostockGroup
Agency Based Discussion => Adobe Stock => Topic started by: blvdone on October 03, 2023, 08:38
-
I got $614 for about 6,500 photos. Is this good or bad?
I know a guy who got $7,000. That's a lot.
-
I got a bit more than this for 1650 photos.
But I'm not happy about it, because my work was abused to compete against me, without my explicit consent. >:(
-
I got a bit more than this for 1650 photos.
But I'm not happy about it, because my work was abused to compete against me, without my explicit consent. >:(
A bit more than $614 or $7,000?
I think a contributor should make AI version of one’s top selling photos using software that use our dataset.
-
How many images roughly for $7000?
-
I got a bit more than this for 1650 photos.
But I'm not happy about it, because my work was abused to compete against me, without my explicit consent. >:(
A bit more than $614 years r $7,000?
A bit more than $614. :)
-
How many images roughly for $7000?
I only see 100 pages on his portfolio of mostly photos.
-
I got 1400$ (portfolio 30000)
-
Has anyone heard yet if the "Training" as Adobe calls it uses the images forever?
-
I got a bit more than this for 1650 photos.
But I'm not happy about it, because my work was abused to compete against me, without my explicit consent. >:(
"I got $614 for about 6,500 photos. Is this good or bad?"
Why do they pay the same amount of money for 6500 photos and for 1650 photos? :o
-
I got a bit more than this for 1650 photos.
But I'm not happy about it, because my work was abused to compete against me, without my explicit consent. >:(
"I got $614 for about 6,500 photos. Is this good or bad?"
Why do they pay the same amount of money for 6500 photos and for 1650 photos? :o
Because this was not a "per photo" payment. The payment is based on the number of approved images and the number of licenses that those images generated