Thought I'd bring this subject to the top with a new thread. Chode has commented elsewhere, but for info here's a copy of a post I've made on the Fotolia forum this evening:
I've noticed today that looking at my portfolio sorted by 'relevance' brings up an apparently mixed bag of results with the first few pages populated by best selling images interspersed with a number of old pictures many of which have zero sales and hardly any views.
I'm all for progress and variety, but I have to question the logic of introducing a new relevance sort that seems to try to promote pictures that have been available for a long time but have yet to generate sales; all this can do is dilute or reduce overall sales. If a picture has been available for a year and hasn't sold I certainly don't want that picture on my front page.
My own sales today have dropped 60% compared to a normal weekday.
I understand the need to promote new images. I also understand the logic of continuing to promote best sellers. But to shove old, unpopular pictures to the front of the queue seems to me to be courting disaster.
I hope this is just 'teething troubles' for a new more varied relevance sort facility at Fotolia, but I have to say that if the sort stays as it looks today I suspect that my sales and bank balance are going to look rather unhappy.