MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: My AI image got rejected for Intellectual Property Refusal. Will I be banned?  (Read 2007 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: September 24, 2023, 14:12 »
0
Just one AI photo got rejected.  Will I be blocked/banned by Adobe Stock?  I'm worried.  In the past, an image or video got rejected for whatever reason, there was no such a thing as being banned/blocked.  But due to a recent trend by Adobe Stock banning contributors of many years and thousands of photos/videos, I'm worried.

"During our review, we found that it contains elements that appear to be protected by intellectual property (IP) laws, so we can't accept it into our collection. Elements protected by IP may appear in the image or in the description, title, and/or keywords."


« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2023, 14:18 »
+4
I can't offer anything specific, but so far, the people who have been blocked had accepted work that fell into that category. So Adobe Stock accepted it by mistake and then blocked the contributor afterwards.

Your situation sounds better in that they rejected it.

What I would be worried about is submitting anything new that fell foul of whatever rule you broke. I can imagine them having rules about repeated violations - although I don't know of anything specific.

Are you now clear on what the violation was and how to avoid it in the future?

« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2023, 15:09 »
+2
I don't assume that a rejected image leads with a possible copyright infringement - at this point the review worked and the image was correctly rejected. (if there really was a possible copyright infringement with the image).

I had exactly the same text on a rejection a few days ago (though the image had nothing potentially copyright infringing for me).
But since the image is rejected, I don't see any danger.

I also had an account block and there it was only about pictures that were accepted and therefore online - I had the name of an artist in the search words in 5 of my pictures and I had simply overlooked that.

So I wouldn't worry about the one rejected picture, because the picture is not online and therefore no copyright can be violated.

« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2023, 15:55 »
0
I just examined the rejected AI photos.  The one that was rejected for Intellectual Property had an apple looking logo on the back of smartphone.  I overlooked it.  Also, 3 AI photos that were rejected for "Quality Issues" had 6 fingers on a model.  So, I got to be more careful.  Other photos with the same prompt got accepted.  So, I got to be more careful with those issues when submitting.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2023, 16:03 by blvdone »

« Reply #4 on: September 24, 2023, 16:03 »
0
6 fingers rejection for "Quality Issues".

« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2023, 16:39 »
+1
You have to always clean up all your tech gadgets.

Not just visible logos, over on istock also for normal photos we have to remove any buttons, notches etc...because it is all part of copyrighted design.

Some agencies are not as strict but usually you need to turn your gadget into a screen with a rectangular form and nothing else.

After all you don't want to get sued by anyone yourself, removing it all does not just protect customers, it protects you.

These are normal rejections, only if you don't learn from these mistakes will you risk someone putting their foot down on your port.

The current blocking problem is about content that was accepted by Adobe but has issues. And instead of just removing the content or working constructively with producers, Adobe has a very weird shoot first talk later protocol.

For a software company that relies on great customer workflows, this is extremely strange.

Because unlike with other agencies, we are all Adobe customers.

eta

It is good that you are learning ai skills. Two years from now (or maybe earlier?) you will be able to apply all you learned to create ai video.

« Last Edit: September 24, 2023, 16:51 by cobalt »

« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2023, 11:00 »
0
 :o ::) :-\ Wow. Wow. Wow.
Focus is perfect where it should be, hands look like what we can expect for AI generation.
Well, I leave here for a BETTER normal life, and real nice photos.  ;D
I hope ADOBE will do something efficient for the pollution in the database.

I know that serious people have left this forum... I think I will do the same.

« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2023, 00:13 »
+2
Also, 3 AI photos that were rejected for "Quality Issues" had 6 fingers on a model.  So, I got to be more careful.

I remember watching a news story years ago about a family who had quite a few members with six fingers. So that can actually be a real thing.

« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2023, 12:03 »
0
Also, 3 AI photos that were rejected for "Quality Issues" had 6 fingers on a model.  So, I got to be more careful.

I remember watching a news story years ago about a family who had quite a few members with six fingers. So that can actually be a real thing.

Good point.  LOL.  Adobe, are you listening?


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
4 Replies
2844 Views
Last post February 20, 2016, 09:02
by steheap
11 Replies
4318 Views
Last post February 01, 2017, 17:24
by YadaYadaYada
34 Replies
8876 Views
Last post June 04, 2017, 09:37
by niktol
9 Replies
4281 Views
Last post June 29, 2019, 13:36
by increasingdifficulty
7 Replies
3747 Views
Last post January 16, 2023, 11:55
by Lowls

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors