MicrostockGroup

Agency Based Discussion => Adobe Stock => Topic started by: kwest on August 13, 2013, 15:04

Title: Setting Prices
Post by: kwest on August 13, 2013, 15:04
Has anyone else noticed that they can't set prices on their new uploads anymore and that they just default to the minimum price on Fotolia? They have always defaulted to the minimum but I've always been able to change it in the past.
Title: Re: Setting Prices
Post by: gillian vann on August 13, 2013, 18:07
i just uploaded two as a test, and using indexing was only able to change the largest size's price.
Title: Re: Setting Prices
Post by: Lev on August 14, 2013, 04:50
"Due to low sales, you cannot modify the price until it sells at least 0 more times"
Title: Re: Setting Prices
Post by: Ploink on August 14, 2013, 05:03
"Due to low sales, you cannot modify the price until it sells at least 0 more times"

Well, check again in -2 weeks, maybe it has sold 0 more times then... :o *SCNR*

It looks like FT has recruited key IT-personnel from IS  ;D
Title: Re: Setting Prices
Post by: Lev on August 14, 2013, 10:39
now system does not allow to change price for pictures sold 3 times after lowering the price.

pricing automatically goes back to "minimal normal", but with no possibility to change it to 2 credits base (Emerald)

"Due to low sales the price of this content is blocked". message is displayed.

something changed again. does anyone have any info?
Title: Re: Setting Prices
Post by: luissantos84 on August 14, 2013, 10:41
I am done trying to figure out anything at FT
Title: Re: Setting Prices
Post by: stockmarketer on August 14, 2013, 10:44
.
Title: Re: Setting Prices
Post by: lisafx on August 14, 2013, 18:27
now system does not allow to change price for pictures sold 3 times after lowering the price.

pricing automatically goes back to "minimal normal", but with no possibility to change it to 2 credits base (Emerald)

"Due to low sales the price of this content is blocked". message is displayed.

something changed again. does anyone have any info?

I just experienced the same thing on a couple of images that are supposed to be eligible to be marked back up.  I was able to do the markups yesterday, so this is definitely something new. 

Did I miss an announcement, or is this something they are slipping in the back door?  (which can be taken two ways and both are accurate  >:( )