Quote from: Madoo on June 15, 2023, 00:32

Quote from: MatHayward on June 14, 2023, 14:39

Hi everyone,

I'm announcing a big update in the workflow for those of you submitting generative AI images to Adobe Stock. With the successful launch of the search filter and generative AI display in the customer facing site, we are no longer requiring you add "generative AI" to your title or keywords. Effective immediately, you can stop adding "generative AI" to your title and keywords if you prefer.

It is VERY important you continue to select the "created using generative AI tools" checkbox and that you submit your generative AI content as an illustration. Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Mat Hayward

Do you realize that no one of AI uploaders is forced to select that option ?
Do you realize  that yellow bar in upload section does nothing to force them to upload AI content as they are pleased to ?
Do you realize that AI content is uploaded even as photos ? And there is nothing to stop AI uploaders to do so ?
Do you realize that AI content is uploaded even as vectors ? And there is nothing to stop AI uploaders to do so ?
Simply look at new photos or vectors in collection, you'll see what I am talking about.
Do you realize that there is various groups on social media that are posting, on daily bases, basically content with how to F**K Adobe  and submit AI content? 
Do you realize how much it is demotivational for your contributors to wait 28 days for moderation and we all know that cause of that is AI pandemic ?
Do you realize how much it is demotivational for your photo/vector/illustration contributors to see that blurry AI "art" with deformed faces and hands are accepted ?
Do you realize how much your AI acceptance with no quality standards harm your photo/vector/illustration contributors ?

And what does MatHayward have to do with it? Does he decide whether or not to accept AI content?
What are you so afraid of, competition? About 10 years ago, stock site databases began to grow, and everyone was screaming that everyone would go bankrupt, that income would fall, etc. Outside the window is 2023, and bases of several tens of millions of content do not greatly affect the income of authors.
At the expense of AI content, which one of the authors does not mark as AI content, well, here on the forum I have already discussed this issue, programs that create AI add this information to the file metadata. As a result, such an author will be banned from Adobe. Not to mention the fact that there will not be many such authors initially.
In short, do not hysteria. 

There are two types of contributors, people that play by the rules and people that don't.
It is simple as that.
Problem is that AI "authors" which doesn't play by the rules are NOT , and it seems that they will NOT be, banned from Adobe. Even as this Ai "wild west" upload situation getting worse and worse on daily basis.
I strongly think that Adobe suppose to protect their contributors by punishing those who doesn't play by the rules.

And by the way....If you in that post of mine  found Mat directly and not Adobe...Maybe you should try thinking out of the box.
In short, use brain.

At the expense of AI content, which one of the authors does not mark as AI content, well, here on the forum I have already discussed this issue, programs that create AI add this information to the file metadata.

You do realise it takes seconds to batch change any Metadata you want to remove things?

1. Why do you all think that non-AI labeled content sells better than AI labeled content?

1. Why do you all think that non-AI labeled content sells better than AI labeled content?

- It gets reviewed much faster (2-3) as in opposite to AI content (30 days), thus it appears at the top of the seach when reviewed, but when AI content finally gets approved, it appears somewhere fat in the back, unless customers use a serach filter, so it doesn't get noticed as much.

- There are customers who do not want to buy AI contet, they only want real photos, many because of the still ongoing legal uncertainties surrounding AI content. I have not yet heard of any customer who wants AI images only, and not real photos. So the change of people enabling filters to look at real photos only is higher than of people enabling filters to only look at AI content

So AI content that is mislabeled as real photos has a higher chance of selling, simply because it is easier to be found. Why else do you think Facebook is full of groups discussing how to get away with labeling AI content as real photos? Why do you think people purposefully mislabel their content, if there is nothing to gain from it?

...We need a comparable percentage of sales. ....   I look forward to similar comparisons from those who sell content with AI.

why would anyone reply to the suggestions of someone who may not even HAVE a portfolio!

continued complaining when you don't give actual examples from a portfolio make it impossible for AS or others to respond to questions.