pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: What's going on!  (Read 11563 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: June 10, 2024, 07:40 »
+1
Last week I had only $1 income, the lowest on couple of weeks, with around 4200 assets. I even noticed the review time takes way too long. They usually get it quicker
I have now 500 images in the queue. On other agencies these already have been approved.


« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2024, 08:21 »
+2
last week I had the best week of the last 11 weeks,I'm not saying it was an exceptional week but OK,in DL numbers,Instead regarding earnings the week at the end of May was better.

you have 4200 contents,for how long?How long have you been a contributor on Adobe?you have AI only or even real content?





« Last Edit: June 10, 2024, 08:48 by Injustice for all »

« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2024, 09:31 »
+3
last week I had the best week of the last 11 weeks,I'm not saying it was an exceptional week but OK,in DL numbers,Instead regarding earnings the week at the end of May was better.

you have 4200 contents,for how long?How long have you been a contributor on Adobe?you have AI only or even real content?


95% real photos. Been a contributor for 1 year now. Seems now I have passed 2 weeks into he queue for real images. Where these are approved in couple of days on shutterstock. Becoming really frustrating with Adobe.

« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2024, 09:33 »
+1
last week was also my best week of 2024! in downloads number at least..

but now i'm having an 'ok' monday now.. i dont know, thing went up and down so fast like a rollercoaster

« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2024, 10:01 »
0
last week was also my best week of 2024! in downloads number at least..

but now i'm having an 'ok' monday now.. i dont know, thing went up and down so fast like a rollercoaster

do you have Ai or real photos?

« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2024, 10:46 »
+1
last week I had the best week of the last 11 weeks,I'm not saying it was an exceptional week but OK,in DL numbers,Instead regarding earnings the week at the end of May was better.

you have 4200 contents,for how long?How long have you been a contributor on Adobe?you have AI only or even real content?


95% real photos. Been a contributor for 1 year now. Seems now I have passed 2 weeks into he queue for real images. Where these are approved in couple of days on shutterstock. Becoming really frustrating with Adobe.

Since you have only been a contributor for a year it is normal that you may have some off weeks.

Of course it also depends of what you have,but imo you are doing well,because you have uploaded more than 4000 contents during the first year,you will see that you will have many more sales in the next years because you have started well,the contents are still not ripe enough after one year,and your choice of more real content is better in my opinion.

being an AI producer means having at least 7-800 content approved per month,it's not easy and involves the fact that there is no time for anything else.

I see AI content more as an addiction to my port,but my real work is with real things.

Don't think about review times,keep producing,a couple of weeks or a month what difference does it make,while they approve, hundreds more have already been uploaded!  :D

« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2024, 16:21 »
0
last week I had the best week of the last 11 weeks,I'm not saying it was an exceptional week but OK,in DL numbers,Instead regarding earnings the week at the end of May was better.

you have 4200 contents,for how long?How long have you been a contributor on Adobe?you have AI only or even real content?


95% real photos. Been a contributor for 1 year now. Seems now I have passed 2 weeks into he queue for real images. Where these are approved in couple of days on shutterstock. Becoming really frustrating with Adobe.

Since you have only been a contributor for a year it is normal that you may have some off weeks.

Of course it also depends of what you have,but imo you are doing well,because you have uploaded more than 4000 contents during the first year,you will see that you will have many more sales in the next years because you have started well,the contents are still not ripe enough after one year,and your choice of more real content is better in my opinion.

being an AI producer means having at least 7-800 content approved per month,it's not easy and involves the fact that there is no time for anything else.

I see AI content more as an addiction to my port,but my real work is with real things.

Don't think about review times,keep producing,a couple of weeks or a month what difference does it make,while they approve, hundreds more have already been uploaded!  :D


I only have around 300 ai Images uploaded on my port, as a test. But at the moment I have 560 real photos in the queue. Half of them are nearly 3 weeks waiting to be approved.

I do have some video as well. But not have too much time to produce more.

Sales seems to be low as well for some reason.

« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2024, 17:01 »
+2
lol, based on some of the other ppl saying "OMFG! I HAD THE BEST SALES EVER!" I think you can guess where maybe 'some' of the sales went :P

« Reply #8 on: June 11, 2024, 08:35 »
0
last week was also my best week of 2024! in downloads number at least..

but now i'm having an 'ok' monday now.. i dont know, thing went up and down so fast like a rollercoaster

do you have Ai or real photos?

6K PHOTOS, 6K AI, 100 videos

« Reply #9 on: June 12, 2024, 05:27 »
+2
Last week I had only $1 income, the lowest on couple of weeks, with around 4200 assets. I even noticed the review time takes way too long. They usually get it quicker
I have now 500 images in the queue. On other agencies these already have been approved.

I face the same situation. I used to have several downloads per day in recent months. It dropped to almost nothing starting last week just like that. So to me something must have changed in the Adobe algorithm how stock is searched and sell.

« Reply #10 on: June 12, 2024, 09:39 »
+1
So far I have only 1 download this week. I often have a few 0 days every month, but this is worse than the last week of December or pretty much ever - although the week of Mar 25th was pretty bad too, maybe they were testing this version of the algo that week. >3300 photos, slow but steady uploads lately.

« Reply #11 on: June 12, 2024, 13:17 »
0
slow week for me too so far,but my sales numbers for this month seem to be better than the same day of last month,so nothing serious for the moment,even if the start of this week is really very slow.

zeljkok

  • Non Linear Existence
« Reply #12 on: June 12, 2024, 13:53 »
0
As usual for me, several DLs every day,  all in 0.99 - 0.38 range.   1902 stills port, I upload 2-3 images / week on average.

I think it's all seasonal, depending on customer needs / port specifics, and not algorithm change. 

jar

« Reply #13 on: June 12, 2024, 15:24 »
0
-
« Last Edit: June 12, 2024, 17:29 by hellou »

« Reply #14 on: June 12, 2024, 16:37 »
0
3 weeks for real photos in the queue. Thats the first time images been so long in the queue.

« Reply #15 on: June 21, 2024, 00:53 »
0
No updates on this. I have around 700 files waiting and half of them are waiting more than a month. Never happed this before to me. What's wrong with Adobe ?

« Reply #16 on: June 21, 2024, 06:43 »
0
I think it's all seasonal, depending on customer needs / port specifics, and not algorithm change.

Yep

« Reply #17 on: June 21, 2024, 06:46 »
0
No updates on this. I have around 700 files waiting and half of them are waiting more than a month. Never happed this before to me. What's wrong with Adobe ?

I have some that were submitted months ago and still haven't been reviewed.  I assume they are deluged with, and possibly prioritizing, AL images and that has slowed down reviews for everyone.

« Reply #18 on: June 21, 2024, 07:24 »
0
No updates on this. I have around 700 files waiting and half of them are waiting more than a month. Never happed this before to me. What's wrong with Adobe ?

I understand that it's not nice to have finished content waiting,but since you've already had 4200 content approved in a year I think you can now wait a month or so,I don't think it's anything serious.

You've only been a contributor on Adobe Stock for a year and you already have more than 4,000 content for sale,isn't that enough?  :)

« Reply #19 on: June 21, 2024, 08:58 »
0
No updates on this. I have around 700 files waiting and half of them are waiting more than a month. Never happed this before to me. What's wrong with Adobe ?

I understand that it's not nice to have finished content waiting,but since you've already had 4200 content approved in a year I think you can now wait a month or so,I don't think it's anything serious.

You've only been a contributor on Adobe Stock for a year and you already have more than 4,000 content for sale,isn't that enough?  :)

I only make $5-7 a week :), do you think that's enough?

« Reply #20 on: June 21, 2024, 12:59 »
+4
you're doing it wrong, you just need one really good image that sells for $4000 instead of 4000 images that sell for $.98

« Reply #21 on: June 21, 2024, 14:47 »
+5
you're doing it wrong, you just need one really good image that sells for $4000 instead of 4000 images that sell for $.98

Agree. But how I would know which one is the best without trying lots of images.

« Reply #22 on: June 22, 2024, 03:41 »
+2
No updates on this. I have around 700 files waiting and half of them are waiting more than a month. Never happed this before to me. What's wrong with Adobe ?

I understand that it's not nice to have finished content waiting,but since you've already had 4200 content approved in a year I think you can now wait a month or so,I don't think it's anything serious.

You've only been a contributor on Adobe Stock for a year and you already have more than 4,000 content for sale,isn't that enough?  :)

I only make $5-7 a week :), do you think that's enough?

it's your first year,microstock is a marathon not a sprint.

anyway the point is that you have already had more than 4000 content approved in the first year,now even if you have to wait sometimes a month or two for review I don't think it makes much difference,your content will still be approved shortly.

« Reply #23 on: June 22, 2024, 05:32 »
0
No updates on this. I have around 700 files waiting and half of them are waiting more than a month. Never happed this before to me. What's wrong with Adobe ?

I understand that it's not nice to have finished content waiting,but since you've already had 4200 content approved in a year I think you can now wait a month or so,I don't think it's anything serious.

You've only been a contributor on Adobe Stock for a year and you already have more than 4,000 content for sale,isn't that enough?  :)

I only make $5-7 a week :), do you think that's enough?

it's your first year,microstock is a marathon not a sprint.

anyway the point is that you have already had more than 4000 content approved in the first year,now even if you have to wait sometimes a month or two for review I don't think it makes much difference,your content will still be approved shortly.

I really hope. On other agencies already have been approved. And made some sales. It's really annoying. Maybe Matt can check it out.

« Reply #24 on: June 22, 2024, 07:00 »
+2
That week I had about $200 in sales.  Around 12,000 images in portfolio.  Only $1/wk for 4,000 assets is pretty bad honestly.  If you can post your portfolio, I can give you an advice.  My portfolio is below.

https://stock.adobe.com/search?creator_id=203855208
« Last Edit: June 22, 2024, 07:03 by blvdone »

« Reply #25 on: June 22, 2024, 12:15 »
0
That week I had about $200 in sales.  Around 12,000 images in portfolio.  Only $1/wk for 4,000 assets is pretty bad honestly.  If you can post your portfolio, I can give you an advice.  My portfolio is below.

https://stock.adobe.com/search?creator_id=203855208

Thanks. I can PM my portfolio if that's OK.

« Reply #26 on: June 22, 2024, 14:25 »
0
That week I had about $200 in sales.  Around 12,000 images in portfolio.  Only $1/wk for 4,000 assets is pretty bad honestly.  If you can post your portfolio, I can give you an advice.  My portfolio is below.

https://stock.adobe.com/search?creator_id=203855208

Thanks. I can PM my portfolio if that's OK.

Yes, go ahead.

« Reply #27 on: June 24, 2024, 18:48 »
0
Last week I had only $1 income, the lowest on couple of weeks, with around 4200 assets. I even noticed the review time takes way too long. They usually get it quicker
I have now 500 images in the queue. On other agencies these already have been approved.

I face the same situation. I used to have several downloads per day in recent months. It dropped to almost nothing starting last week just like that. So to me something must have changed in the Adobe algorithm how stock is searched and sell.

Yes, seems like the algorithm has changed. I'm getting a lot of older images selling. Plus sales have dropped. Hopefully they change it back soon  :D

« Reply #28 on: June 24, 2024, 22:32 »
0
PNG files are 20 days waiting for approval. Never waited for so long. What is going on?

« Reply #29 on: June 25, 2024, 00:22 »
0
down to 700 files now waiting. something has changed definitely.

« Reply #30 on: June 25, 2024, 16:15 »
+5
That week I had about $200 in sales.  Around 12,000 images in portfolio.  Only $1/wk for 4,000 assets is pretty bad honestly.  If you can post your portfolio, I can give you an advice.  My portfolio is below.

https://stock.adobe.com/search?creator_id=203855208

Nice portfolio.

« Reply #31 on: June 25, 2024, 23:00 »
0
That week I had about $200 in sales.  Around 12,000 images in portfolio.  Only $1/wk for 4,000 assets is pretty bad honestly.  If you can post your portfolio, I can give you an advice.  My portfolio is below.

https://stock.adobe.com/search?creator_id=203855208

Nice portfolio.

Thanks!!

« Reply #32 on: June 26, 2024, 01:18 »
+3
12.000 images, impressing job, tedious work, just great, with one little handicap: going through page after page they all look like super perfect manufactured AI photos, even they are not.
My mind is disrupted by AI, I love hand crafted photos from which are not perfect, compared with home made food, but with soul.

« Reply #33 on: June 26, 2024, 05:01 »
+4
In my opinion "blvdone" did an impressive job.

There is a lot of work and sacrifice in generating and improving thousands of AI images that are in his portfolio,which was already a high-level portfolio before AI.

Furthermore,in my opinion "blvdone" was good because moved quickly,long before me and many others in devise,generating,indexing and uploading thousands of AI contents in very short time.

So credit where credit is due!  :)

You can thank me by PM me your dealer's contact information!  :D
« Last Edit: June 26, 2024, 11:50 by Injustice for all »

« Reply #34 on: June 26, 2024, 11:50 »
0
I think Adobe went funny on my portfolio. None of my 800 files have been reviewed and, none of images nominated and received an email saying that some of my images have been re reviewed and have been removed from the port. Probably will stop supply any images or videos to them...

« Reply #35 on: June 26, 2024, 13:43 »
+3
12.000 images, impressing job, tedious work, just great, with one little handicap: going through page after page they all look like super perfect manufactured AI photos, even they are not.
My mind is disrupted by AI, I love hand crafted photos from which are not perfect, compared with home made food, but with soul.

My portfolio is 6,000 real photos and 6,000 AI images.  Nobody go through somebody's portfolio page by page to find the image they want.  They just do keyword search.  Also, based on my sales, buyers don't care about AI or real photos.  It took about 10 years to get to 6,000 real photos.  It took less than 1 year to get to 6,000 AI photos.  And my revenue has nearly doubled.  So, I would rather be smart and not miss this opportunity with AI photos.  Good luck!!
« Last Edit: June 26, 2024, 13:49 by blvdone »

« Reply #36 on: June 26, 2024, 13:47 »
+2
In my opinion "blvdone" did an impressive job.

There is a lot of work and sacrifice in generating and improving thousands of AI images that are in his portfolio,which was already a high-level portfolio before AI.

Furthermore,in my opinion "blvdone" was good because moved quickly,long before me and many others in devise,generating,indexing and uploading thousands of AI contents in very short time.

So credit where credit is due!  :)

You can thank me by PM me your dealer's contact information!  :D

Thank you!!!  I actually came in late in this AI game.  I started in September last year.  At that time, there were already millions of AI images on Adobe Stock.  I started the AI image creation because I felt threatened by those AI images potentially taking away sales from real photos.  I'm glad I started making AI images.  It's the only growth I see in stock photos now.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2024, 16:03 by blvdone »

« Reply #37 on: June 26, 2024, 18:28 »
+1
That week I had about $200 in sales.  Around 12,000 images in portfolio.  Only $1/wk for 4,000 assets is pretty bad honestly.  If you can post your portfolio, I can give you an advice.  My portfolio is below.

https://stock.adobe.com/search?creator_id=203855208
hi one question
You have very good images but I see a lot of people images I m not talking about the portraits but pics from random people
How are these accepted ??adobe dont take editorial
In many of them people are recognisable

« Reply #38 on: June 26, 2024, 22:52 »
+2
That week I had about $200 in sales.  Around 12,000 images in portfolio.  Only $1/wk for 4,000 assets is pretty bad honestly.  If you can post your portfolio, I can give you an advice.  My portfolio is below.

https://stock.adobe.com/search?creator_id=203855208
hi one question
You have very good images but I see a lot of people images I m not talking about the portraits but pics from random people
How are these accepted ??adobe dont take editorial
In many of them people are recognisable

They are AI generated.

« Reply #39 on: June 26, 2024, 23:11 »
0
That week I had about $200 in sales.  Around 12,000 images in portfolio.  Only $1/wk for 4,000 assets is pretty bad honestly.  If you can post your portfolio, I can give you an advice.  My portfolio is below.

https://stock.adobe.com/search?creator_id=203855208
hi one question
You have very good images but I see a lot of people images I m not talking about the portraits but pics from random people
How are these accepted ??adobe dont take editorial
In many of them people are recognisable

They are AI generated.

 ;D ;D

« Reply #40 on: June 27, 2024, 09:27 »
0
In a forum in Turkey, a user talked about sales on Adobe that brought in around $60. I saw this a few years ago. I have been loading for 1.5 years and I have never had a sale of that amount. My highest sales were around $6, and that only happened once. Are there any sales that make a profit of 50-60 dollars?

odesigns

« Reply #41 on: June 27, 2024, 09:50 »
+1
Are there any sales that make a profit of 50-60 dollars?

Yes.

« Reply #42 on: June 27, 2024, 12:19 »
+1
In my opinion "blvdone" did an impressive job.

There is a lot of work and sacrifice in generating and improving thousands of AI images that are in his portfolio,which was already a high-level portfolio before AI.

Furthermore,in my opinion "blvdone" was good because moved quickly,long before me and many others in devise,generating,indexing and uploading thousands of AI contents in very short time.

So credit where credit is due!  :)

You can thank me by PM me your dealer's contact information!  :D

Thank you!!!  I actually came in late in this AI game.  I started in September last year.  At that time, there were already millions of AI images on Adobe Stock.  I started the AI image creation because I felt threatened by those AI images potentially taking away sales from real photos.  I'm glad I started making AI images.  It's the only growth I see in stock photos now.

September last year was a great time to start uploading AI,it was until December,before whatever you did with AI you sold very easily,now it's already different,it's always a good time even now,but for sure it wasn't as easy as up until December.

the fundamental difference is in the time it takes them to sell,now it takes a few months before they start to take off,previously sales were often immediate after approval.

but you could tell me better because you have more AI than me,have you noticed this difference too?

I still have tens of thousands of AIs to send for review,can you believe I can't find the time?I'm too busy with videos and other projects,I have to get moving on these AIs,I've already selected some batches I absolutely have to find the time,maybe next month I will only send AI for the whole month.


« Reply #43 on: June 30, 2024, 06:31 »
0
I think Adobe went funny on my portfolio. None of my 800 files have been reviewed and, none of images nominated and received an email saying that some of my images have been re reviewed and have been removed from the port. Probably will stop supply any images or videos to them...

I just got my latest upload from June 22nd reviewed today.  Only about a week for them to review.  Is it normal these days?

wds

« Reply #44 on: June 30, 2024, 07:11 »
+2
I think Adobe went funny on my portfolio. None of my 800 files have been reviewed and, none of images nominated and received an email saying that some of my images have been re reviewed and have been removed from the port. Probably will stop supply any images or videos to them...

I just got my latest upload from June 22nd reviewed today.  Only about a week for them to review.  Is it normal these days?

I still have files that are just over a month sitting in queue.

« Reply #45 on: June 30, 2024, 07:19 »
+1
I think Adobe went funny on my portfolio. None of my 800 files have been reviewed and, none of images nominated and received an email saying that some of my images have been re reviewed and have been removed from the port. Probably will stop supply any images or videos to them...

I just got my latest upload from June 22nd reviewed today.  Only about a week for them to review.  Is it normal these days?

I still have files that are just over a month sitting in queue.
Me too just over a month.

« Reply #46 on: June 30, 2024, 07:54 »
+2
So, I'm given a preferential treatment?  I take it!!

« Reply #47 on: June 30, 2024, 11:18 »
+1
about a week for ai photo, two days for ai illustrations, png still sitting there over a month.

non people ai moves faster than people ai for me.

« Reply #48 on: June 30, 2024, 12:16 »
0
So, I'm given a preferential treatment?  I take it!!

hmmm, wait for the next...

« Reply #49 on: July 03, 2024, 14:06 »
+2
I have files in queue for 2 and some for 3 months, what is going on?
that never happend and it is damaging my sales, all non AI

« Reply #50 on: July 03, 2024, 16:21 »
+1
I have files in queue for 2 and some for 3 months, what is going on?
that never happend and it is damaging my sales, all non AI

I've noticed they are prioritising the AI content. My real photos still in the queue while new Ai images have been reviewed.

« Reply #51 on: July 06, 2024, 05:11 »
0
Since last few weeks, AI images are getting reviewed very fast, but they are also rejecting most of the content. Earlier most of my content used to get accepted but now most of the images with people are getting rejected. I suspect they are using a bot to review images.

Mir

« Reply #52 on: July 06, 2024, 06:05 »
0
Are your vector images being reviewed. I don't submit many images but it's kind of demotivating to add more. I also have one vector sitting there for 8 months.
« Last Edit: July 06, 2024, 06:10 by Mir »

« Reply #53 on: July 06, 2024, 06:59 »
0
No, I did not submit vector images.

« Reply #54 on: July 07, 2024, 10:51 »
0
Are your vector images being reviewed. I don't submit many images but it's kind of demotivating to add more. I also have one vector sitting there for 8 months.

Something might be not right with that file. I had a png with no transparency sitting for 3 months. They didnt reject it, but let it sit there. I accidentally saved it with no transparency in Lightroom. Resubmitted it, and it was reviewed normally

Mir

« Reply #55 on: July 07, 2024, 11:25 »
0
@Mifornia - Thanks, my other vectors are in the queue between 12 days and a month as of today, 8 images. I don't have AI ones.

« Reply #56 on: July 07, 2024, 12:07 »
0
Are your vector images being reviewed. I don't submit many images but it's kind of demotivating to add more. I also have one vector sitting there for 8 months.

Something might be not right with that file. I had a png with no transparency sitting for 3 months. They didnt reject it, but let it sit there. I accidentally saved it with no transparency in Lightroom. Resubmitted it, and it was reviewed normally

Excuse me for asking, but what sense does a png make without transparency? Why did you upload the image as a png and not a jpg?

wds

« Reply #57 on: July 07, 2024, 13:27 »
0
I had some recent submissions reviewed within 5 days, while other files are sitting there for well over a month. All non-editorial....and the 'quick" reviews were AI.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2024, 21:15 by wds »

« Reply #58 on: July 07, 2024, 13:29 »
+1
Can confirm that ai images have been reviewed quicker than my normal images. Videos have been reviewed quicker too. MY real photos stilll in the queue for 2 months now. 700 files.

« Reply #59 on: July 07, 2024, 18:01 »
+2
If AI photos are being approved faster, should I just fib and select the AI button? Or would hey know it was a lie since the people all have the right number of fingers? ;D

« Reply #60 on: July 08, 2024, 13:33 »
+1
I have files in queue for 2 and some for 3 months, what is going on?
that never happend and it is damaging my sales, all non AI

It is taking about 8 days to have my photos reviewed.

« Reply #61 on: July 08, 2024, 14:45 »
+2
the most recently reviewed commercial photo of mine was uploaded almost 2 months ago.  the last 7+ weeks are all sitting there aging like a fine wine.  video and editorial gets reviewed quickly though so i guess that's what i'll focus on.  sales are slumping heavily as well, sigh.

« Reply #62 on: July 08, 2024, 21:37 »
0
My first image from 20 May has just been reviewed.

zeljkok

  • Non Linear Existence
« Reply #63 on: July 09, 2024, 01:14 »
0
I am all but certain RF review time is directly related to acceptance rate.    I.e Bob and Tom submit image at same time;  Bob has 85% acceptance rate,  Tom has 95%.   Tom waits few days,  Bob waits few weeks.



Mir

« Reply #64 on: July 09, 2024, 05:12 »
+2
I don't think it is. I don't have rejections except for a few images submitted 7 years ago.

« Reply #65 on: July 10, 2024, 19:39 »
+3
...

« Reply #66 on: July 11, 2024, 07:45 »
+2
...

you need to specify christmas of which year

« Reply #67 on: July 11, 2024, 08:54 »
0
Has anyone already received their payment?  :-[

« Reply #68 on: July 11, 2024, 08:58 »
0
no, still waiting.

« Reply #69 on: July 11, 2024, 09:06 »
+2
My earnings were deposited into my Payoneer account this morning.

« Reply #70 on: July 12, 2024, 09:01 »
0
payment received yesterday,requested on June 27th,normally Adobe pay much earlier,this time little late probably due to more payment requests than usual,for the free collection bonus,or upfront payment if you prefer.

« Reply #71 on: July 29, 2024, 15:58 »
+2
That week I had about $200 in sales.  Around 12,000 images in portfolio.  Only $1/wk for 4,000 assets is pretty bad honestly.  If you can post your portfolio, I can give you an advice.  My portfolio is below.

https://stock.adobe.com/search?creator_id=203855208
Nice portfolio.

Nice portfolio???  :o And he feels well placed for giving advices!  :o :o wow
Not sure that Rafale mode users are Gods ::)

I must admit that I submit sometimes 2, 3 variations of a same subject.

But this
https://stock.adobe.com/fr/search?order=relevance&serie_id=485406634&order=relevance&serie_id=485406634
is far beyond the limit. Size does matter, for a certain type of portfolio.

If I did this, I would not feel at ease to come in and whine that my account has been blocked... and proclaim to all immaculate innocence (and not the slightest doubt about the blind compassion of all).

Account and submission guidelines
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/submission-guidelines.html

Content spamming
Content spamming, which includes sending multiple submissions of identical or almost identical files, is not allowed. Discover the difference between useful content variations and content that is considered spam here.

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/similar-vs-spamming.html
Similar content is one of the leading reasons we reject content. Sending multiple copies of identical content can be perceived as image spam, and can result in your account being blocked or permanently closed.
« Last Edit: July 29, 2024, 16:03 by DiscreetDuck »


 

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors