I think it doesn't really depend on the image resolution,reviews have become harsher and longer in general.

my current situation is only my fault,because I wasted too much time trying to do particular things,but above all things that required too much time,in fact I only have 1500 AI contents at the moment,and with little different themes.

I also have thousands of real contents though.

in any case,this has become a numbers game now more than ever,and I've never been particularly good at producing a high amount of content because I paid too much attention to detail.

so now that's enough,if I have to do the numbers,let's do the numbers,from now on I will try to send at least 30-50 contents a day.

select the generated contents yes,but without wasting too much time in post-production.

turbo mode activated! 

Average week, 6000 illustrations, 2000 videos (motion graphics), no AI

A tiny move up.

Got another similar decline for something that is new to my port.

I am so tired of this Adobe roulette system. I really used to love that agency.

I think 15-20 a day is perfectly normal for good content and usually enough to grow a port.

We should not be forced to compete with the spammers.

I uploaded around 10 yesterday and 20 today. I also deleted several older files from the queue.

I think once a few from a day are reviewed, I will always remove those that are left. looks like these files are destined for the garbage bin.

Average week, 6000 illustrations, 2000 videos (motion graphics), no AI

That's pretty good! What kind of motion graphics do you do? Does it take a long time to put them together?

Since last month, Adobe has been on a downhill. Sales are down, above all they are rejecting literally everything since middle of February. Also, some of my images are in review for 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1 months now. Every month some of the images gets stuck in review. I am afraid, with the rise of AI, a day will come when they will reduce our royalties like istock and gutterstock.

please try the small size thing. in the discord there is an ai uploader who just had 400 from 490 accepted and he points out that small size is important.

Since last month, Adobe has been on a downhill. Sales are down, above all they are rejecting literally everything since middle of February. Also, some of my images are in review for 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1 months now. Every month some of the images gets stuck in review. I am afraid, with the rise of AI, a day will come when they will reduce our royalties like istock and gutterstock.

Has the Enshittification of Adobe Stock begun?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification

Probably yes (but I hope I'm wrong).

Like almost all Big Tech in recent years ... Follow the money: this is the only thing they are capable of doing.

No pursuit of quality, customer and collaborator services reduced to a minimum (there are stupid chatbots everywhere now), earnings according to the 80/20 scheme. 80% of the earnings to them and 20% of the earnings to us.

Unfortunately, today almost all companies follow this scheme: 70% marketing, 20% sales, 10% service/product ... and this is why we live in a world of products and services that are increasingly disgusting.

Quote from: Saurav on April 07, 2025, 04:09

Since last month, Adobe has been on a downhill. Sales are down, above all they are rejecting literally everything since middle of February. Also, some of my images are in review for 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1 months now. Every month some of the images gets stuck in review. I am afraid, with the rise of AI, a day will come when they will reduce our royalties like istock and gutterstock.

Has the Enshittification of Adobe Stock begun?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification

Probably yes (but I hope I'm wrong).

Like almost all Big Tech in recent years ... Follow the money: this is the only thing they are capable of doing.

No pursuit of quality, customer and collaborator services reduced to a minimum (there are stupid chatbots everywhere now), earnings according to the 80/20 scheme. 80% of the earnings to them and 20% of the earnings to us.

Unfortunately, today almost all companies follow this scheme: 70% marketing, 20% sales, 10% service/product ... and this is why we live in a world of products and services that are increasingly disgusting.

That's how capitalism actually works. At the beginning, you have to stand out from the crowd with good products or services in the market to be able to compete.

Later, when the large customer base becomes dependent on it, the quality and service/support are reduced and prices are increased. Until eventually a collapse occurs (creative destruction) and the game starts all over again. Currently, we are in the cycle of crap and are drifting towards the big collapse.

...

Later, when the large customer base becomes dependent on it, the quality and service/support are reduced and prices are increased. Until eventually a collapse occurs (creative destruction) and the game starts all over again. Currently, we are in the cycle of crap and are drifting towards the big collapse.

no, that's just destruction & decay & may not see a replacement

creative destruction is a positive  process in which new innovations replace and make obsolete older innovations. -- word processing, transimstors, digital cameras, ...

please try the small size thing. in the discord there is an ai uploader who just had 400 from 490 accepted and he points out that small size is important.

so no,the reason for the rejection of the 16 contents is not attributable to the size/resolution of the content,because I sent 4 again reducing the size but they were rejected anyway.

It doesn't matter for the 16 contents,but more than anything I wanted to try to understand why for future works.

so I was reading the official Adobe help pages about the criteria and timelines,and the points with which the team evaluates the contents are these:

-legal standards

-technical qualities

-title and keyword accuracy

-commercial value

-aesthetic properties

-uniqueness,both in relation to other content you,ve submitted and content already in our collection.

So a content must satisfy all of this to be accepted.

I think the biggest problem why many contents are rejected,in general for a while now for everybody, is the uniqueness of the content in relation to what is already present in the library,but as you can see the reasons can be many and the resolution/quality of the image is only one of these reasons.

Unfortunately,I don't have much time today in general,but I also have to figure out these videos that have not yet been reviewed,they are not the usual videos that I have always sent and that have always been accepted,so I have to understand why,so I will try various,new options,and I will process these videos again in different ways,and send them again,without deleting the videos that are still under review.

I'll figure this out somehow eventually! 

Adobe's rejections are 90% because of quality aspects. I guess that there are a lot of contributors who provide very good quality since the flux model is now very common.
So your competition might become a lot harder now.

true,although I think it's more of a 50/50 between quality and similar,but also these criteria have been around for a long time,so we can say with reasonable certainty,that these criteria are applied with greater intensity today.

Reviews have generally become more restricted,and the library has grown a lot in the last year,making it much more difficult to produce unique content that is also saleable.

Before all my AI content was accepted,it was really rare for me to get rejections,I have AI content for sale with a resolution of 5376 x 3072 and even better.

so in my opinion,today we need to take these points,listed previously,more carefully,and I am also quite sure that if unique contents are produced,even if they are not excellent in quality,but acceptable in quality,will still be accepted.