0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
No need to sell your photographic gear just yet, but AI generated images do sell really, really well. At least in my experience.
Maybe the graphics and photos are beautiful. Apparently Midjourney steals photos and graphics without the authors consent. Probably not an honest company. It is better to use Adobe Ai honestly
Adobe Ai has content and commercial use rights. Midjourney has more data for content creation but I don't think it has commercial use rights. Even for a fee.
Quote from: userpoland on September 30, 2023, 13:53Adobe Ai has content and commercial use rights. Midjourney has more data for content creation but I don't think it has commercial use rights. Even for a fee.So Adobe are uninformed and misled or they are sufficiently informed and after analysis have decided to accept this AI pictures? To me is the second.
Ok. Where does Midjourney get the data to create the images? Does it have permission from the authors?Adobe Ai. It has the rights to create the images because it has its library and shares the profits with the authors.
Quote from: userpoland on October 01, 2023, 05:53Ok. Where does Midjourney get the data to create the images? Does it have permission from the authors?Adobe Ai. It has the rights to create the images because it has its library and shares the profits with the authors.No, they do not have permission, they just scraped the internet But since Adobe trained thair AI also with Midjourney (and DALL-E, and Stable difusion, etc...) images, they also trained their AI with images they had no permission to use. So, same thing.Adobe just keeps saying their AI was ethnical and fair - and legally safe. But since they deliberately also used other AI generator's AI images submitted by contributors to their database to train their own AI, they know very well that this is just a ruse. Could have been so easily avoided if they only used real photos to train their AI, but they decided against that.
I wonder how Midjourney got their "Dataset". Is there any alternative to Midjourney to create AI stock photos?
Quote from: blvdone on October 03, 2023, 07:12I wonder how Midjourney got their "Dataset". Is there any alternative to Midjourney to create AI stock photos?They scraped the internet.
Quote from: Mir on October 03, 2023, 07:20Quote from: blvdone on October 03, 2023, 07:12I wonder how Midjourney got their "Dataset". Is there any alternative to Midjourney to create AI stock photos?They scraped the internet.Laion-5B, a nonprofit, publicly available database that indexes more than five billion images from across the Internet, including the work of many artists.See here: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite-scroll/is-ai-art-stealing-from-artists
QuoteThey scraped the internet.There must be a collective lawsuit against Midjourney in the future.
They scraped the internet.
Quote from: Bauman on October 03, 2023, 08:16Quote from: Mir on October 03, 2023, 07:20Quote from: blvdone on October 03, 2023, 07:12I wonder how Midjourney got their "Dataset". Is there any alternative to Midjourney to create AI stock photos?They scraped the internet.Laion-5B, a nonprofit, publicly available database that indexes more than five billion images from across the Internet, including the work of many artists.See here: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite-scroll/is-ai-art-stealing-from-artistsThere must be a collective lawsuit against Midjourney in the future.
So far it's difficult, because artists have a hard time proving that their specific image was used to train Midjourney's AI.But there is talk about an EU law that will require developers of AI to make all material that was used to train an AI public. It's unclear if this will pass, so far it's just a draft. But if it happens, artists will have a better chance with lawsuits, because then at least they will be able to prove that their images/text/music/voice/etc. was even used.
Quote from: Her Ugliness on October 03, 2023, 13:46 So far it's difficult, because artists have a hard time proving that their specific image was used to train Midjourney's AI.But there is talk about an EU law that will require developers of AI to make all material that was used to train an AI public. It's unclear if this will pass, so far it's just a draft. But if it happens, artists will have a better chance with lawsuits, because then at least they will be able to prove that their images/text/music/voice/etc. was even used. not practical for anyone w 100+ imag es on multiple sites, having to do individual searches & recording - all for .00001c per image
Just tried Adobe Firefly, but Midjourney is much better. Firefly generated images aren't on point and not usable for stock photo yet.
Started by Lambros Kazan Image Sleuth
Started by cicerocastro Adobe Stock
Started by Neapolis4ever Adobe Stock
Started by SpaceStockFootage « 1 2 ... 11 12 » Shutterstock.com
Started by JohnTravolski Newbie Discussion