Text only | Text with Images

MicrostockGroup

Agency Based Discussion => Adobe Stock => Topic started by: Drago76 on March 11, 2012, 07:46

Title: why "free section" pics at FT not showing in my portfolio?
Post by: Drago76 on March 11, 2012, 07:46
anyone knows?
yes, it is a "free", but it has mine anyway...
as i know, in DT, for example, even "free" photos shown in your PF.
PS it is any advantage from free photos in FT?
Title: Re: why "free section" pics at FT not showing in my portfolio?
Post by: Microstock Posts on March 11, 2012, 08:43
Quote from: Drago76 on March 11, 2012, 07:46
anyone knows?
yes, it is a "free", but it has mine anyway...
as i know, in DT, for example, even "free" photos shown in your PF.
PS it is any advantage from free photos in FT?

Yes, there are advantages for free photos.

1. Buyers don't have to pay for them.
2. The site gets more traffic from people looking for free photos, which may help the site, but not as much as it helps people looking for free photos.
Title: Re: why "free section" pics at FT not showing in my portfolio?
Post by: sam100 on March 11, 2012, 10:36
Quote from: Microstock Posts on March 11, 2012, 08:43
Quote from: Drago76 on March 11, 2012, 07:46
anyone knows?
yes, it is a "free", but it has mine anyway...
as i know, in DT, for example, even "free" photos shown in your PF.
PS it is any advantage from free photos in FT?

Yes, there are advantages for free photos.

1. Buyers don't have to pay for them.
2. The site gets more traffic from people looking for free photos, which may help the site, but not as much as it helps people looking for free photos.

;D
Title: Re: why "free section" pics at FT not showing in my portfolio?
Post by: loop on March 11, 2012, 13:16
Quote from: Microstock Posts on March 11, 2012, 08:43
Quote from: Drago76 on March 11, 2012, 07:46
anyone knows?
yes, it is a "free", but it has mine anyway...
as i know, in DT, for example, even "free" photos shown in your PF.
PS it is any advantage from free photos in FT?

Yes, there are advantages for free photos.

1. Buyers don't have to pay for them.
2. The site gets more traffic from people looking for free photos, which may help the site, but not as much as it helps people looking for free photos.

I've used the free sections of this and others sites when working pro-bono, but never bougth a single one from them. If I need images, I use istock, because I'm exclusive there, and I can change credits.
Text only | Text with Images