Agency Based Discussion > General - Top Sites
Size & Sales
bjorn:
Hi,
Just curious...
What size photo's do you sell most?
Would there be a difference per agent, or per image? (if i look at my numbers there is).
I checked the last couple of weeks and here are my stats (in %):
If I look at my % there is little need for a bigger camera ;)
DT:
Max 68%
Large 15%
Mid 4%
Small 13%
FT:
XL Standard 4%
L Standard 26%
M Standard 70%
Istock:
Large 17%
Medium 21%
Small 45%
Xsmal 17%
looking forward to see your score's and to hear what you think of it.
Regards,
Bjorn
CJPhoto:
I dont keep that statistic but I do keep a similar one which shows a similar thing, as by chance, I was just drafting a blog few minutes ago that had this info in it (the post will be going up over the weekend).
So here is the average price per DL from the various sites. Obviously the higher the amount, the larger the size (ie. Fotolia is about 64c which means my average size is medium - but that could be 1 large and 3 small):
25c shutterstock
71c istockphoto
14% dreamtime
64c fotolia
58c 123RF
110c StockXpert
76c bigstockphoto
190c Featurepics
80c LuckyOliver
le_cyclope:
Here's my stats:
IS:
Xs 29.8%
S 26.4%
M 27.7%
L 16.2%
XL 0%
DT:
S 4.8%
M 0%
L 44.6%
XL 45.8%
ST:
S 55.9%
M 26.5%
L 8.8%
XL 8.8%
FT:
S 70.1%
M 23.9%
L 6.0%
And for commission per DL:
IS 0.59$
DT 0.82$
ST 0.90$
FT 0.45$
SS 0.25$ ( ;) )
Claude
sharply_done:
Sorry, I don't track that statistic, either.
Apart from making larger images, a higher resolution camera also allows you to downsize, which can be a real bonus for noisy and blurry grab shots.
hatman12:
These size statistics are largely irrelevant, or at least possibly misleading.
As mentioned in another thread, advice from hidesy says that if you have images available at XL and/or XXL size that sends an important message to potential buyers that you are a serious player and are prepared to invest in the best equipment. That might generate downloads of smaller sizes that wouldn't otherwise happen.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version