Agency Based Discussion > General - Top Sites

Frustrated with Shutterstock reviewers

<< < (2/16) > >>

Joshzhen:

--- Quote from: Noedelhap on November 16, 2019, 13:22 ---Unbelievable. They clearly favor some contributors over others, even though all these should have been rejected for being too similar.

But Shutterstock is going down the drain anyway, if they continue this way.

--- End quote ---

The income from selling images from shutterstock is getting worse.

Microstock Posts:

--- Quote from: Bad Robot on November 16, 2019, 10:20 ---What do you expect they pay reviewers peanuts and recruit anyone with minimal oversight  :(

Pay peanuts what do you get ?  ;D

--- End quote ---

How much do they pay?

wollwerth:
I'm not sure what's going on with video reviews. Probably half of my submissions get rejected, usually for noise/pixillation/compression. I then resubmit it and they take it. If I didn't have such a high upload bandwidth it wouldn't be worth it, especially with these occasional $1.50 video sales.

Mimi the Cat:

--- Quote from: Microstock Posts on February 10, 2020, 06:54 ---
--- Quote from: Bad Robot on November 16, 2019, 10:20 ---What do you expect they pay reviewers peanuts and recruit anyone with minimal oversight  :(

Pay peanuts what do you get ?  ;D

--- End quote ---

How much do they pay?

--- End quote ---

Peanuts ~ why? looking for a job? ;D

Tenebroso:
Not all file reviewers are stupid. Obviously, someone has stable sex. This affects being focused on work or being bitter in life. When the company realizes that spam is swallowed and they do not have the full quality collections, they will wonder what is failing.

They have many eggs, but the eggs must be held in the large brain, above the head. I have not seen so much irresponsibility in a company ever. Hopefully Adobe will overcome them soon.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version