Quote from: cascoly on October 07, 2022, 14:42

Quote from: stoker2014 on October 07, 2022, 13:22

We are working for the future. So the future belongs to artificial intelligence, and it does not need our tags.

guess you don't care about an income UNTIL AI takes over?

Income will now be with any tags. Therefore, it is better to direct your energy towards creating new content than adding optimal tags to existing content. As soon as stocks start using 100% artificial intelligence, tags will not be taken into account at all.
It's like before the start of mass production of cars, you could spend money on buying horses and carriages, or you could wait 1-3 years and buy cars.

how is AI going to know what city or country of the image? where a market is located?  tags will still assist AI in making an accurate assessment

Quote from: cascoly on October 08, 2022, 12:43

Quote from: stoker2014 on October 08, 2022, 07:35

Quote from: cascoly on October 07, 2022, 14:42

Quote from: stoker2014 on October 07, 2022, 13:22

We are working for the future. So the future belongs to artificial intelligence, and it does not need our tags.

guess you don't care about an income UNTIL AI takes over?

Income will now be with any tags. Therefore, it is better to direct your energy towards creating new content than adding optimal tags to existing content. As soon as stocks start using 100% artificial intelligence, tags will not be taken into account at all.
It's like before the start of mass production of cars, you could spend money on buying horses and carriages, or you could wait 1-3 years and buy cars.

how is AI going to know what city or country of the image? where a market is located?  tags will still assist AI in making an accurate assessment

Artificial intelligence for that and intelligence . And where enough is filmed and the title is in the title. I'm not talking about the fact that all the places on the planet have already been filmed a million times, and artificial intelligence can determine this even without a name.

that's my point - it doesn't take AI to read metadata. so tags continue to be important -- but, as you say it is npossible for AI that recognizes Notre Dame even if it's not in the metadata

Quote from: stoker2014 on October 08, 2022, 07:35

Quote from: cascoly on October 07, 2022, 14:42

Quote from: stoker2014 on October 07, 2022, 13:22

We are working for the future. So the future belongs to artificial intelligence, and it does not need our tags.

guess you don't care about an income UNTIL AI takes over?

Income will now be with any tags. Therefore, it is better to direct your energy towards creating new content than adding optimal tags to existing content. As soon as stocks start using 100% artificial intelligence, tags will not be taken into account at all.
It's like before the start of mass production of cars, you could spend money on buying horses and carriages, or you could wait 1-3 years and buy cars.

how is AI going to know what city or country of the image? where a market is located?  tags will still assist AI in making an accurate assessment

Tags will still be needed.

I didn't say that. I think that AI can recognize everything.

Where was this photo taken? I'll assume you are smarter than AI?

Or this one?

Google easily finds these photos of yours on the Internet. And this is also artificial intelligence.

[quote author=Uncle Pete link=topic=37365.msg580684#msg580684 date=1665501093
AI can't recognize photos LOCATIONS was the point, and we will still need metadata. That is the issue.
I disagree with your generalization that tags won't be needed.
[/quote]
Yes, write your tags, no one bothers you.
Google easily found your photos on the Internet and it says where they were taken too. In any case, the stocks will switch to intellect, because. it will serve buyers better than tags, many of which are either spam or don't match the image.

Quote from: stoker2014

Quote from: Uncle Pete on October 11, 2022, 10:11

AI can't recognize photos LOCATIONS was the point, and we will still need metadata. That is the issue.
I disagree with your generalization that tags won't be needed.

...
Google easily found your photos on the Internet and it says where they were taken too. In any case, the stocks will switch to intellect, because. it will serve buyers better than tags, many of which are either spam or don't match the image.

no evidence Google use ML or other AI - rather it likely used TAGS to identify the location

In this case, Google remembered the picture and found it in the article where everything about this picture was written. This is not your photo, but a photo from the Internet.

pancaketom, Maybe. But in this topic, it seems that they suggested somehow ranking the tags in order to somehow adapt to the search algorithms on stocks. And this seems to me a bad idea, because. algorithms may well already work on the basis of artificial intelligence.

Quote from: stoker2014 on October 12, 2022, 02:23

pancaketom, Maybe. But in this topic, it seems that they suggested somehow ranking the tags in order to somehow adapt to the search algorithms on stocks. And this seems to me a bad idea, because. algorithms may well already work on the basis of artificial intelligence.

please explain how AI can identify images without desc & tags

There are photo and video bases, there is geolocation, there are satellite bases. But everything I write is still the future.
Google found your photos on the Internet in an article where everything is written about them. Found because these photos have already been published.

Quote from: stoker2014 on October 10, 2022, 14:17

Quote from: Uncle Pete on October 10, 2022, 12:35

Where was this photo taken? I'll assume you are smarter than AI?

I am not smarter than artificial intelligence and no one is smarter.
AI is a database of images and a lot of other information. And every year AI will get smarter and smarter.
Do you consider yourself smarter than a computer? You don't even know how it works before the microcircuit.

As for your photos, I don't care where they were taken, I'm not even interested. This topic discusses other issues.

"" I am not smarter than artificial intelligence and no one is smarter."Maybe you are not but I think smarter are persons who did it AI. Same like i casino. Winner is always casino.

People taught PC to play chess, do you think those who did it play better chess?