MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Heated Debate on White Balance  (Read 8720 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.



« Reply #26 on: January 28, 2013, 14:15 »
0
Or snow has 2 white balances:
http://www.naturephotos.dk/NaturePhotos_show_pic_ejergalleri.php?kgf=20934&art=0&menu=1&_Ejer=3&sort=&start=4


Very nice! A little masking going on there I bet.


Thanks.
Yes yes. Photoshopping. But the difference in wb was there to begin with. Snow can be blue and also yellow.
And for all of you who are interested in wb, that a closer look at Monets waterlillies. And close means close. Then you can see it. The same brush on one side filled with a cold colour and on the other side a warm.
Like this one:
« Last Edit: January 28, 2013, 14:19 by JPSDK »

« Reply #27 on: January 28, 2013, 14:47 »
+1
Amen

« Reply #28 on: January 28, 2013, 14:48 »
0

Besides, from time to time I need to pick up older images and reprocess them, and the RAW ones are great because the conversion programs are so much advanced nowadays that the reprocessed images are incredibly better than the versions converted 6 years ago. My first hundreds DSLR images that were shot in jpeg will be forever poor and hard to correct...


Yes! When we gave up our iStock exclusivity and started to upload elsewhere again, we looked at our older images and realised we could do a lot better now. Back to the dng's to reprocess them, and with several years experience and tools development the new pics are enormously improved.

« Reply #29 on: January 28, 2013, 15:02 »
0
These sorts of discussions are akin to religious arguments and I'd recommend staying away.

If there's a discussion about how to get accurate white balance, or use of a gray card, that's worth reading as you can learn about a technique you might want to use.

Any of those "you always..." or "you never..." conversations are generally filled with people who do more talking than shooting :)

Jsnova, are you implying all religious arguments are bad? Wether it is religion or white balance there are always good and bad arguments  :)
In this case he "being lazy" because he adjust WB in lightroom is a very bad argument and I agree with your recommendation.

It's been a while since I saw 'freezingpictures' as a name in the recent poster list.... welcome back :)

Thanks :-)

« Reply #30 on: January 28, 2013, 17:47 »
+2
When people ask me questions like these I usually respond with "what does your customer demand?".  Then follow up with "what workflow meets your customers requirements?". Many of these people are not making sales so get quickly stumped by the "customer" inquiry. If the "customer" is the shooter (no commercial output) then his desires will be very different than mine (whether or not I sell or am my own customer). I think many of us would shoot differently for portraiture, vs. iStock, vs. SS vs. Alamy, vs. newspaper, vs. corporate event, vs. wedding.  There is no right answer but what results are needed for the customer.  Time, technique, skill, and money, are only tools to the end result for the customer.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
13 Replies
5632 Views
Last post January 21, 2011, 02:02
by luissantos84
11 Replies
7502 Views
Last post March 17, 2011, 00:11
by RacePhoto
White Balance

Started by tab62 « 1 2  All » Newbie Discussion

33 Replies
15240 Views
Last post April 10, 2011, 20:20
by luissantos84
74 Replies
26623 Views
Last post January 15, 2012, 13:49
by Sandeel
3 Replies
4050 Views
Last post June 05, 2013, 17:06
by Mantis

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors