MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: "Sensitive Usages" of model-released images  (Read 1548 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Brasilnut

  • Author Brutally Honest Guide to Microstock & Blog

« on: May 20, 2018, 04:49 »
0
Has anybody here ever had any awkward instances of situations when your model-released commercial images were used in a potentially "sensitive way"?

I just published a blog post highlighting two of my images:

www.brutallyhonestmicrostock.com/2018/05/20/important-considerations-for-model-released-stock-shoots-sensitive-uses/

Best regards,

Alex



ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2018, 10:08 »
+2
If a file is designated as 'editorial only', that doesn't necessarily prevent it from being used 'sensitively', e.g. to illustrate an editorial on bedwetting/whatever. (E.g. via iS/Getty, where you don't even need to put 'posed by model' on editorial, from what you quoted). People would need to check all the terms and conditions of each agency they submit to. Also bear in mind that buyers don't always read the rules, and people could have different ideas of what constitutes 'defamatory' or 'sensitive' use.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2018, 13:29 by ShadySue »

« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2018, 22:46 »
0
I had a photo from my first shoot ever that someone used with words along side of it saying things like 'skank' and 'slut'.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
25 Replies
22021 Views
Last post May 26, 2015, 05:40
by cathyslife
0 Replies
1609 Views
Last post July 02, 2017, 00:34
by Chichikov
3 Replies
2686 Views
Last post January 26, 2019, 03:15
by PZF
5 Replies
1516 Views
Last post April 23, 2019, 06:57
by helloitsme
8 Replies
1655 Views
Last post May 13, 2019, 19:42
by helloitsme

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors

3100 Posing Cards Bundle