MicrostockGroup

Microstock Photography Forum - General => General Stock Discussion => Topic started by: borg on February 02, 2010, 15:01

Title: A.D. 2010. Subscription Hell (or Heaven) Year???
Post by: borg on February 02, 2010, 15:01

Beginning of this year is recognizable by increasing the number of subscription sales...
 
On DT I have 10 in a row in two days.... On other sites almost the same....

Does it mean less earnings, or agencies knows what they are doing...?
Is it a way of attracting more customers and money ,from which we continue to receive our "piece of cake"?
Or is it just "assent" of the struggle for survival on the market ...?

 

Title: Re: A.D. 2010. Subscription Hell Year
Post by: PeterChigmaroff on February 02, 2010, 15:44

Subscriptions are the bane of all photographers. I can't imagine why anyone would like the them.

Title: Re: A.D. 2010. Subscription Hell Year
Post by: cathyslife on February 02, 2010, 15:47

Think back a few years...then it was

Subscriptions Microstock is the bane of all photographers.

Title: Re: A.D. 2010. Subscription Hell Year
Post by: sharpshot on February 02, 2010, 16:09

I like subscriptions, they work well.  It is the price and commissions that are wrong at the moment.  They should go up, as pay per download prices have moved up.  I would also like to know what my commission percentage is.  Fix those problems and subs are fine.