MicrostockGroup
Microstock Photography Forum - General => General Stock Discussion => Topic started by: angelacat on May 16, 2024, 06:46
-
8 photographs rejected by Adobe because they are "During our review, we found that it is likely to be generated by AI and not labelled as such".
It's not true, I've emailed Adobe support - just annoying I keep having to prove I'm not plagarising other's work.
-
8 photographs rejected by Adobe because they are "During our review, we found that it is likely to be generated by AI and not labelled as such".
It's not true, I've emailed Adobe support - just annoying I keep having to prove I'm not plagarising other's work.
Adobe employees vs AI
(https://c.tenor.com/BkmFMY7RCYgAAAAd/tenor.gif)
(https://www.photofunky.net/output/image/9/7/6/b/976b81/photofunky.gif)
(https://c.tenor.com/GxfSlJG_H7AAAAAd/tenor.gif) ;D ;D ;D
Now, seriously, meanwhile, tons of AI-generated images are presented as real photographs to Adobe customers. This company is scuttling itself and is losing its reputation for serious.
Adobe should train its workers a little better, and they should learn that a human body does not have 3 legs and 12 fingers...
A scientific study has provided proof! mediocrity is not incompatible with technology, nor with modernity...
-
LOL yeah just sums it all up.
AI this, AI that, AI will save the world - it's that latest "insane, gamechanger" (sigh) ;D
-
Yep, I had the same happen. I had removed the meta data from my images (I just don't like having all the flash settings/camera type/etc stored in it), and they were not accepted... Very odd.
-
Ah right I'll look into the meta data thing - see if mines missing somehow. Thanks
-
This happened to me me as well. 3d renders (submitted twice because of this) and both times were rejected as AI. I did open a ticket but from what I see here the problem might be wider.
-
Maybe AI has become sentient and believes it is the real deal and everything else is to be labelled AI ;D