MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Adobe Stock Keywords  (Read 3548 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: September 09, 2023, 08:16 »
0
If (as everyone says) it's mostly the first 20 keywords that really matter, what purpose does the other 30 serve?



« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2023, 13:01 »
0
Thanks Mat,

Really helpful

« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2023, 13:02 »
+6
confused - if the order matters, why does LRC automatically alphabetize them?

« Reply #4 on: September 11, 2023, 15:54 »
+1
confused - if the order matters, why does LRC automatically alphabetize them?

One of the top features of Lightroom is the organizational capabilities. Alphabetical keywords makes sense for the vast majority of Lightroom use cases. We are the only exception I can think of.

As a compromise, the Lightroom team made an update in which the original order of keywords is retained as you add them. In LR the keywords are still displayed alphabetically, however when you upload to Adobe Stock, the keywords are added in the order you originally listed them. It's not the cleanest UI, but it is effective.

Personally, I add my keywords in Adobe Bridge to embed in metadata. I only use LR keywords to keep track of what I've got and where.

-Mat Hayward

« Reply #5 on: September 11, 2023, 22:57 »
0
How important is to add keywords to image metadata? I can do that from my computer, but not from my iPad (most of my illustrations are made on iPad) It it ok if I dont add metadata to my images?

« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2023, 09:03 »
+1
How important is to add keywords to image metadata? I can do that from my computer, but not from my iPad (most of my illustrations are made on iPad) It it ok if I dont add metadata to my images?

You must add a title and at least 5 keywords before you can submit. It doesn't matter if you embed them in the metadata before upload, or if you add them in the contributor portal after you upload. It must be done. Not only is it required, it's by far the most effective way to get your content seen and sold.

-Mat Hayward

« Reply #7 on: September 12, 2023, 13:30 »
0
confused - if the order matters, why does LRC automatically alphabetize them?

One of the top features of Lightroom is the organizational capabilities. Alphabetical keywords makes sense for the vast majority of Lightroom use cases. We are the only exception I can think of.

As a compromise, the Lightroom team made an update in which the original order of keywords is retained as you add them. In LR the keywords are still displayed alphabetically, however when you upload to Adobe Stock, the keywords are added in the order you originally listed them. It's not the cleanest UI, but it is effective.

Personally, I add my keywords in Adobe Bridge to embed in metadata. I only use LR keywords to keep track of what I've got and where.

-Mat Hayward

thank s - does that change apply to both LR & LRC?  i just use LRC for captioning & bulk resizing, as the catalog features dont matvch my workflow & naming conventions.

« Reply #8 on: September 12, 2023, 15:29 »
+1
confused - if the order matters, why does LRC automatically alphabetize them?

One of the top features of Lightroom is the organizational capabilities. Alphabetical keywords makes sense for the vast majority of Lightroom use cases. We are the only exception I can think of.

As a compromise, the Lightroom team made an update in which the original order of keywords is retained as you add them. In LR the keywords are still displayed alphabetically, however when you upload to Adobe Stock, the keywords are added in the order you originally listed them. It's not the cleanest UI, but it is effective.

Personally, I add my keywords in Adobe Bridge to embed in metadata. I only use LR keywords to keep track of what I've got and where.

-Mat Hayward

Can you tell us a little more about this change? Link to a video/tutorial?

I do everything in LRc but with stock images I'm uploading to Adobe, I'm forced into an additional step, where I paste keywords from LRc into a Pages (Word) document & then rearrange them so the ten most important are first. I then use that to paste into Adobe when I upload, which is very time consuming...

Even if I do keywords in order in PS, if I opened the original RAW from LRc, it will rearrange them alphbetically in any saved tiffs or jpegs. Will Adobe Stock recognize what I did in PS?

I often just use LRc, so with the change, can I simply paste my keywords into LRc in the right order and will it then upload them to Adobe in that order? Does that work or do you need to enter them one by one? What do you mean by initial order? Is it the first time you save metadata to the file? Or, the most recent?

I have many saved LRc Keyword/Caption Metatdata presets that get added as I import my photos into LRc to be tweaked as needed, but this means the initial keywords will always end up in alphabetical order due to LRc's insistence on not allowing us to save a preset in the order we'd prefer. So does this then defeat the new system?

I used to organize all my Adobe Stock images in the Adobe Stock plugin which no longer works - so how do you upload to Adobe Stock & have it recognize whatever "initial order" in LR means?

Even if you embed your keywords using Bridge, if your file is in your catalog in LRc, LR will rearrange the keywords, and it's pointless to import into LRc only after it's been uploaded to Adobe Stock - organization is the first step. So I don't see that as a viable solution.

Honestly, with all the amazing bells and whistles in LRc, why couldn't they just make it a Preferences option to organize keywords manually or alphabetically? Problem solved. I've gotta think you've got IT folks who can figure this out.

« Reply #9 on: September 12, 2023, 16:09 »
0
confused - if the order matters, why does LRC automatically alphabetize them?

One of the top features of Lightroom is the organizational capabilities. Alphabetical keywords makes sense for the vast majority of Lightroom use cases. We are the only exception I can think of.

As a compromise, the Lightroom team made an update in which the original order of keywords is retained as you add them. In LR the keywords are still displayed alphabetically, however when you upload to Adobe Stock, the keywords are added in the order you originally listed them. It's not the cleanest UI, but it is effective.

Personally, I add my keywords in Adobe Bridge to embed in metadata. I only use LR keywords to keep track of what I've got and where.

-Mat Hayward

Can you tell us a little more about this change? Link to a video/tutorial?

I do everything in LRc but with stock images I'm uploading to Adobe, I'm forced into an additional step, where I paste keywords from LRc into a Pages (Word) document & then rearrange them so the ten most important are first. I then use that to paste into Adobe when I upload, which is very time consuming...

Even if I do keywords in order in PS, if I opened the original RAW from LRc, it will rearrange them alphbetically in any saved tiffs or jpegs. Will Adobe Stock recognize what I did in PS?

I often just use LRc, so with the change, can I simply paste my keywords into LRc in the right order and will it then upload them to Adobe in that order? Does that work or do you need to enter them one by one? What do you mean by initial order? Is it the first time you save metadata to the file? Or, the most recent?

I have many saved LRc Keyword/Caption Metatdata presets that get added as I import my photos into LRc to be tweaked as needed, but this means the initial keywords will always end up in alphabetical order due to LRc's insistence on not allowing us to save a preset in the order we'd prefer. So does this then defeat the new system?

I used to organize all my Adobe Stock images in the Adobe Stock plugin which no longer works - so how do you upload to Adobe Stock & have it recognize whatever "initial order" in LR means?

Even if you embed your keywords using Bridge, if your file is in your catalog in LRc, LR will rearrange the keywords, and it's pointless to import into LRc only after it's been uploaded to Adobe Stock - organization is the first step. So I don't see that as a viable solution.

Honestly, with all the amazing bells and whistles in LRc, why couldn't they just make it a Preferences option to organize keywords manually or alphabetically? Problem solved. I've gotta think you've got IT folks who can figure this out.

It's been quite a while since I've tested this, but in short yes....I've only used this in Lightroom Classic. You can bypass the step in which you copy/paste into Word and re-arrange (that seems like it would be easier directly in the contributor portal anyway).

Give it a test with one image to see for yourself if it satisfies your needs. I know it's not ideal to view them in alphabetical order, but with the order being kept when and where it truly counts, it is certainly better than it used to be.

-Mat

« Reply #10 on: September 12, 2023, 20:33 »
0
Photoshop file info function keeps all keywords in the order you input.  I used to use Bridge for Metadata but got fed up with Bridge sorting everything alphabetically which then made it a pain to upload to Adobe.  Now I use the file info function in photoshop, which includes the ability to save a template which can be applied to all photos in a series.  Easy.

« Reply #11 on: September 12, 2023, 21:33 »
+1
Photoshop file info function keeps all keywords in the order you input.  I used to use Bridge for Metadata but got fed up with Bridge sorting everything alphabetically which then made it a pain to upload to Adobe.  Now I use the file info function in photoshop, which includes the ability to save a template which can be applied to all photos in a series.  Easy.

I always keyword in Bridge and it never changes my order.

« Reply #12 on: January 08, 2024, 21:51 »
0
How important is to add keywords to image metadata? I can do that from my computer, but not from my iPad (most of my illustrations are made on iPad) It it ok if I dont add metadata to my images?

You must add a title and at least 5 keywords before you can submit. It doesn't matter if you embed them in the metadata before upload, or if you add them in the contributor portal after you upload. It must be done. Not only is it required, it's by far the most effective way to get your content seen and sold.

-Mat Hayward

Thank you Mat for your reply. I have another question:
I see that numerous other accounts/people copied my description and keywords exactly word to word from my best sellers. Is that allowed?

« Reply #13 on: January 09, 2024, 09:47 »
0
How important is to add keywords to image metadata? I can do that from my computer, but not from my iPad (most of my illustrations are made on iPad) It it ok if I dont add metadata to my images?

You must add a title and at least 5 keywords before you can submit. It doesn't matter if you embed them in the metadata before upload, or if you add them in the contributor portal after you upload. It must be done. Not only is it required, it's by far the most effective way to get your content seen and sold.

-Mat Hayward

Thank you Mat for your reply. I have another question:
I see that numerous other accounts/people copied my description and keywords exactly word to word from my best sellers. Is that allowed?

We don't display the keywords added by the contributor in Adobe Stock. Instead, what is displayed is a list of recommended search terms that may produce results relevant to the subject the customer is looking for.

-Mat Hayward 

« Reply #14 on: January 24, 2024, 15:02 »
0
The first ten keywords have the most weight in search results. You can add up to 49 relevant keywords. They all play a role in search. As long as they are relevant, you should add as many as you can think of. The tool here in MSG is effective in providing useful keywords. Spend the most time focusing on the first ten, the rest is helpful, just not quite as impactful in the results.

-Mat Hayward

Hi Mat,

Could you please advise if adding keyword composed of 3 words is a good idea or shall I separate all words?

« Reply #15 on: January 24, 2024, 18:33 »
+2
The first ten keywords have the most weight in search results. You can add up to 49 relevant keywords. They all play a role in search. As long as they are relevant, you should add as many as you can think of. The tool here in MSG is effective in providing useful keywords. Spend the most time focusing on the first ten, the rest is helpful, just not quite as impactful in the results.

-Mat Hayward

Hi Mat,

Could you please advise if adding keyword composed of 3 words is a good idea or shall I separate all words?

It depends on the context. Would the compound keyword appear in the dictionary that way? A good example I like to use is "Golden gate bridge". That makes sense as a three word compound keywords. I would also list separately, the individual keyword "bridge" but I would not use "golden" or "gate" individually.

"Red dress" is an example where you should list two separate keywords "red" and "dress" individually and not together.

Hope that helps,

Mat Hayward

« Reply #16 on: January 25, 2024, 19:22 »
0
How important is to add keywords to image metadata? I can do that from my computer, but not from my iPad (most of my illustrations are made on iPad) It it ok if I dont add metadata to my images?

You must add a title and at least 5 keywords before you can submit. It doesn't matter if you embed them in the metadata before upload, or if you add them in the contributor portal after you upload. It must be done. Not only is it required, it's by far the most effective way to get your content seen and sold.

-Mat Hayward

Thank you Mat for your reply. I have another question:
I see that numerous other accounts/people copied my description and keywords exactly word to word from my best sellers. Is that allowed?

We don't display the keywords added by the contributor in Adobe Stock. Instead, what is displayed is a list of recommended search terms that may produce results relevant to the subject the customer is looking for.

-Mat Hayward

Mat, and what about the title? I found about 50 accounts that copied my very long and unique title word for word (along with my best selling image) Is that kind of plagiarism allowed at Adobe Stock?


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
3 Replies
5857 Views
Last post December 29, 2016, 21:03
by Jo Ann Snover
3 Replies
2972 Views
Last post August 29, 2017, 14:21
by vladimir
2 Replies
1990 Views
Last post August 17, 2019, 10:16
by suz7
7 Replies
6099 Views
Last post February 03, 2021, 04:47
by smcbuki
2 Replies
733 Views
Last post November 05, 2023, 12:24
by Uncle Pete

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors