pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Agency Significantly Owned by Contributors  (Read 9790 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: June 14, 2015, 07:37 »
+1
.
 
« Last Edit: June 14, 2015, 23:22 by cdwheatley »


« Reply #26 on: June 14, 2015, 17:22 »
+17
Call me a heretic but I reckon a board of directors made up of contributors would be a complete disaster they probably wouldn't be able to agree to what paper to record the board meeting minutes on!


« Reply #27 on: June 14, 2015, 19:06 »
0
.
« Last Edit: June 14, 2015, 23:22 by cdwheatley »

« Reply #28 on: June 14, 2015, 19:21 »
+9
Call me a heretic but I reckon a board of directors made up of contributors would be a complete disaster they probably wouldn't be able to agree to what paper to record the board meeting minutes on!
  LOL once we get the agree disagree buttons worked out I'm sure we can hammer this one out...

« Reply #29 on: June 14, 2015, 22:19 »
0
Call me a heretic but I reckon a board of directors made up of contributors would be a complete disaster they probably wouldn't be able to agree to what paper to record the board meeting minutes on!
  LOL once we get the agree disagree buttons worked out I'm sure we can hammer this one out...


You all are so funny!  :)  (Sarcasm)
« Last Edit: June 14, 2015, 23:45 by cathyslife »

« Reply #30 on: June 14, 2015, 22:39 »
+4
Better funny than mean.

« Reply #31 on: June 14, 2015, 22:51 »
0
-1

Making fun of other contributors seems mean to me. Not to mention off topic and unprofessional. I thought the new MSG was going to be professional.
« Last Edit: June 14, 2015, 23:40 by cathyslife »

« Reply #32 on: June 15, 2015, 00:51 »
+13
I haven't named anyone so I don't see the harm.

Whilst the comment seemed flippant there's a serious point behind it you need Directors that understand business and are professional in that area. I have to say in my opinion many posts here demonstrate a lack of understanding of commercial realities. So totally ON TOPIC

You can still be professional and have a sense of humour ???

« Reply #33 on: June 15, 2015, 05:28 »
0
I haven't named anyone so I don't see the harm.

Whilst the comment seemed flippant there's a serious point behind it you need Directors that understand business and are professional in that area. I have to say in my opinion many posts here demonstrate a lack of understanding of commercial realities. So totally ON TOPIC

You can still be professional and have a sense of humour ???


I disagree.

« Reply #34 on: June 15, 2015, 06:17 »
+4
Cathy,

With everything? It would be interesting to hear you point of view

« Reply #35 on: June 15, 2015, 11:14 »
0
at this time when so many ppl are unhappy about shutterstock , which is their main earning,
u will sure to see new messiahs coming out to save us contributors ;D ;D ;D
it's like the mob (as in mobile , not mob as in cosa nostra) where everyone is trying to get
the kids money to a smart phone deal.
just don't lose your pants alongwith your photos  8)

« Reply #36 on: June 15, 2015, 12:33 »
0
I can't trust in Charles Taylor II (the first one was the worst president of Liberia, indicted for many crimes, hoax etc...), because his proposal is absolutely wrong. To became shareholder I need a reliable business plan first.

« Reply #37 on: June 16, 2015, 02:45 »
0
I haven't named anyone so I don't see the harm.

Whilst the comment seemed flippant there's a serious point behind it you need Directors that understand business and are professional in that area. I have to say in my opinion many posts here demonstrate a lack of understanding of commercial realities. So totally ON TOPIC

You can still be professional and have a sense of humour ???


I disagree.

It appears that in the first round, the wise and funny garnered more support than the plain disagreement.
In the wee hours of the morning after, the score shows 9:0 in favor of the defender.

« Reply #38 on: July 13, 2015, 14:33 »
0
Just got the same invitation message, wonder if anyone has signed up or become an investor?   

« Reply #39 on: July 13, 2015, 22:21 »
0
If you want to be partner/shareholder in a stock agency, now is the time to load up on SS shares, they are down to $55.
 

« Reply #40 on: July 14, 2015, 05:04 »
0
Wonder if Fotolia/Adobe is beginning to hurt - next set of results may prove interesting

« Reply #41 on: July 14, 2015, 15:25 »
0
If you want to be partner/shareholder in a stock agency, now is the time to load up on SS shares, they are down to $55.
Wonder if Fotolia/Adobe is beginning to hurt - next set of results may prove interesting

maybe not. just that the stock is over-valued 8)


« Reply #42 on: July 14, 2015, 16:49 »
0
I think SS is still overvalued with a huge P/E Ratio. It still has a way to go to stabilize.  I would maybe buy at $25 http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=SSTK+Interactive#{"showArea":false,"showLine":false,"lineWidth":"2","showCandle":true,"lineType":"candle","range":"5y","allowChartStacking":true}

If you want to have a long term stock this is not the one. I am an owner in Oils at the moment as they are on multi year lows and pay huge dividends. Shell for example is paying 6.4% dividend now and it is at a 3 year low.

I don't see much enthusiasm for this GDI Media deal, wonder what the game plan is.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
75 Replies
13480 Views
Last post September 21, 2010, 18:07
by FD
9 Replies
5011 Views
Last post March 12, 2011, 21:47
by djpadavona
4 Replies
2010 Views
Last post November 25, 2011, 11:24
by nicemonkey
21 Replies
4274 Views
Last post May 05, 2014, 02:09
by r2d2
32 Replies
6181 Views
Last post January 13, 2015, 21:58
by tickstock

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results