pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: AI are outperforming stock photos on Adobe  (Read 8279 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: July 10, 2023, 13:23 »
0
If you are uploading AI to Adobe. Is it taking a very long time to get approved ?


« Reply #26 on: July 10, 2023, 15:46 »
0
30-45 days it seems

« Reply #27 on: July 31, 2023, 15:13 »
+2
Updated numbers of my son's journey with Ai: the curve started to flatten. Sales of the Ai collection doubled in the first 3 months, now they're starting to slow down. But still it was a very good month and it's still far beyond my expectations when my son started creating and uploading Ai. The collection now has 2100 pics vs 1700 pics at the end of last month.
By the way, July was my BME at AS driven by that Ai collection and some good video sales.

wds

« Reply #28 on: July 31, 2023, 16:21 »
0
If you use MidJourney, is the agreement such that Midjourney could also upload all your output to the stock agencies and sell it themselves?

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #29 on: August 04, 2023, 10:49 »
+1
No doubt I'm missing something, but why wouldn't someone buy e.g. Midjourney or whatever and generate their own AI images, rather than purchasing from an agency?

« Reply #30 on: August 04, 2023, 12:07 »
+1
midjourney doesn't have a collection of ready made images to download. you have to create your own by prompting. which takes time to learn.

and midjourney cannot give you legal protection, because as their own ceo explained himself how they scraped the entire internet without licensing anything.


ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #31 on: August 04, 2023, 12:39 »
0
midjourney doesn't have a collection of ready made images to download. you have to create your own by prompting. which takes time to learn.

and midjourney cannot give you legal protection, because as their own ceo explained himself how they scraped the entire internet without licensing anything.

Are the agencies offering legal protection?

« Reply #32 on: August 04, 2023, 13:32 »
+3
midjourney doesn't have a collection of ready made images to download. you have to create your own by prompting. which takes time to learn.

and midjourney cannot give you legal protection, because as their own ceo explained himself how they scraped the entire internet without licensing anything.

Are the agencies offering legal protection?

Adobe Stock is, but  to its enterprise customers creating Firefly output only. Adobe Stock's current getAI content comes from all the current generative AI tools, none of which is on a secure legal footing. Theoretically Firefly will be - if and when it exits beta - because Adobe trained on its contributors' content + public domain stuff. Adobe's CYA for the content it is accepting is telling contributors they need to ensure they have the rights for commercial use of the content they upload. But Adobe knows as well as anyone that no contributor can know that with Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, etc.

Shutterstock is but only for enterprise customers and things created with their (DALL-E 2 based) tools, not for all the genAI stuff uploaded to their site in spite of the rules saying its not allowed. Their earning call this week said that very few customers are using any of the output from their own AI tool as the quality isn't there: "... lack of true photo realistic outputs are holding back widespread adoption for actual marketing campaigns"

No idea what DepositPhotos, CanStock or 123rf are offering.

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #33 on: August 04, 2023, 13:52 »
0
midjourney doesn't have a collection of ready made images to download. you have to create your own by prompting. which takes time to learn.

and midjourney cannot give you legal protection, because as their own ceo explained himself how they scraped the entire internet without licensing anything.

Are the agencies offering legal protection?

Adobe Stock is, but  to its enterprise customers creating Firefly output only. Adobe Stock's current getAI content comes from all the current generative AI tools, none of which is on a secure legal footing. Theoretically Firefly will be - if and when it exits beta - because Adobe trained on its contributors' content + public domain stuff. Adobe's CYA for the content it is accepting is telling contributors they need to ensure they have the rights for commercial use of the content they upload. But Adobe knows as well as anyone that no contributor can know that with Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, etc.

Shutterstock is but only for enterprise customers and things created with their (DALL-E 2 based) tools, not for all the genAI stuff uploaded to their site in spite of the rules saying its not allowed. Their earning call this week said that very few customers are using any of the output from their own AI tool as the quality isn't there: "... lack of true photo realistic outputs are holding back widespread adoption for actual marketing campaigns"

No idea what DepositPhotos, CanStock or 123rf are offering.

Thanks, interesting!


 

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors