MicrostockGroup
Microstock Photography Forum - General => General Stock Discussion => Topic started by: leaf on March 07, 2013, 02:23
-
I know there have been a few discussion in the past but things change and progress and I also wanted to set up a poll.
In the past I've thought that I needed / wanted a paper release but have been wondering lately if a digital release woudn't be so bad. You could still print out the digital release and it would be signed by the model.. it just wouldn't have ink from a pen on it. Banks and post office's use a digital signature - it must be legally binding.
Thoughts?
If you are using a digital release, which one are you using?
other threads on the subject
----------------
Thread announcing iStock now accepts digital releases (http://www.microstockgroup.com/istockphoto-com/istock-will-start-accepting-digital-releases-%28from-smart-phone-apps%29/)
-
I don't use it and it's really not such a nuisance to use the paper version anyway. If ever I encounter a dispute with a model, I will have enough worry about the content of the contract/dispute, and I don't want to wonder if the digital MR was legally binding or not. Even if I am convinced that it's legally binding, lawyers might want to investigate that, which will cost more time, money and stress.
-
personally I think having a photo of the model taken on my phone while she's standing in front of me shows more consent than a signed form and my good pics of her. I shot some fashion stuff last year and didn't get a mr, what's to stop me from faking it (apart from ethics of course:) ) but the digital release makes you take a pic of the model during the signing process.
I've used top model, still waiting to see if it will be accepted
-
I've created a wiki page to try and gather the information in one spot
http://www.microstockgroup.com/wiki/index.php?title=Digital_Release (http://www.microstockgroup.com/wiki/index.php?title=Digital_Release)
-
No... and i will never use an electronic MR ( of any type). The reason is very simple: In a Courthouse signed, paper MR is more reliable.
-
^ but how? the courts are out of touch.
model: I didn't sign that, it's forged.
me: yes you did
model: no I didn't
etc.
I'd still want a pic of them holding the signed paper release, as a backup. or a thumbprint...
geez, even the witness can be "anybody". years later you won't remember them either.
or,
me: here's a pic of you just after you digitally signed the model release.
model: oh yeah, I remember now. I did sign that.
:)
-
.
-
Apparently there are some countries that don't recognize electronic signatures so you should check that before you travel. I think China is one.
Yeah, iStock says you cannot use a digital release from china
-
We've been using Release Lackey on Android for a year and nobody has refused it. We tried to buy Easy Release but were refused for the crime of having an unlocked and rooted phone!
-
.
-
I was surprised this thread did not run for longer and the wiki that Leaf created has not been added to....
http://www.microstockgroup.com/wiki/index.php?title=Digital_Release (http://www.microstockgroup.com/wiki/index.php?title=Digital_Release)
I have Easy Release on my phone, but seeking a little extra reassurance before using instead of paper release.
Is it safe to assume that since Digital releases are now acceptable for iStock, Getty & Alamy then surely they must be acceptable everywhere else?
Has anybody had a digitally signed Release rejected from anywhere?
Are you now using them?
Thanks
-
DT accepted the digi release, and then rejected the file for copyright bs...