pancakes
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
Forum
Help
Tools
Keyword Research Tool
Keyword Comparison
Polls
History Graph
Submit Vote
Support
Advertise
Premium Membership Sign-Up
Search
Login
Register
MicrostockGroup
»
Microstock Photography Forum - General
»
General Stock Discussion
»
Big 2
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
« previous
next »
Print
Home
| Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: Big 2 (Read 4195 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Perry
«
on:
August 29, 2011, 02:22 »
0
To me, it starts to look like we have a Big 2. My Fotolia earnings are only a 1/6 of what I get from Shutterstock (They were almost even sometime in history!)
Here is my current situation:
Big 2:
Shutterstock
iStock
Middle Tier:
Fotolia
Dreamstime
Veer
123rf
Low Earners:
The rest
So, do YOU still feel we have a "Big 4" ?
Logged
ibogdan
«
Reply #1 on:
August 29, 2011, 03:27 »
0
I definitely agree with you, just your "middle tier" has a different order in my earnings:
Big2:
SS
IS
Middle tier:
Dreamstime
123rf
FT
Veer
Logged
qwerty
«
Reply #2 on:
August 29, 2011, 04:00 »
0
my earnings on DT are more than double FT, I'd vote for a big 3
SS
IS
DT
Interestingly this month Canstock is my highest earner this month due to a number of fotosearch sales but leave them in the low earners as they have earnt about 3% of my total microstock earnings in the last 3 years
regarding the poll on the right are people earning more at depositphoto than at bigstock,canstock and veer ?
Logged
ibogdan
«
Reply #3 on:
August 29, 2011, 04:43 »
0
I'm also very doubtful about Depositphotos performing better than Veer and Canstock.
Logged
rubyroo
«
Reply #4 on:
August 29, 2011, 04:45 »
0
I reported last month that iStock had fallen to fifth place in my sales rankings. So, as of July's figures, my 'big two' would be:
1. Shutterstock
2. Dreamstime
123RF have gained a lot of ground for me, and I'm delighted to see from the chart on the right here (at the time of writing) that they're only 0.1 points away from equalling FT, and I hope to see them move up into the 'big four' soon.
I don't have a problem with a 'big four', I just want to see the agencies who pay fair commissions and treat their contributors respectfully at the top of the tree.
Logged
Slovenian
«
Reply #5 on:
August 29, 2011, 07:12 »
0
In my case it's more like:
Top 2:
SS
IS
Middle tier:
123RF
Bottom tier:
DT
FT
Obviously I only contribute to these 5, but if an agency can't even make 10% of what SS brings me it's a pathetic performer and belongs in the low tier.
Logged
stockmarketer
«
Reply #6 on:
August 29, 2011, 09:26 »
0
I think I'm one of the few who is still having great sales at FT.
Here's how the sites rank for me, with approximate percentages of total earnings:
TOP TIER:
SS - 28% (approx 100 sales/day)
FT - 21% (80)
IS - 18% (30)
DT - 14% (20)
MID TIER:
CAN - 6.5% (10)
BigStock - 4% (10)
123 - 3.5% (10)
DEP - 3.5% (10)
BOTTOM TIER:
GL - .8% (0-1)
SF - .5% (1)
VEER - .1% (0-1)
CRE - .005% (0)
Logged
microstockphoto.co.uk
«
Reply #7 on:
August 29, 2011, 15:19 »
0
For me, it's
BIG ONE:
Shutterstock
BIG FOUR (in order):
Fotolia
Istock
123RF
Dreamstime
123RF
is the real positive surprise, it surpassed
Dreamstime
months ago and will soon surpass Istock
«
Last Edit: August 29, 2011, 15:22 by microstockphoto.co.uk
»
Logged
RacePhoto
«
Reply #8 on:
August 29, 2011, 22:23 »
0
AFter today I had to revise my position, it's now the Big One. I agree
Partner Program
Your files will continue to be sold on iStockphoto, and will also be made available on Getty Images partner sites, such as Thinkstock and Photos.com. As a non-exclusive contributor, all of your files will now automatically be included in the Partner Program.
When I was averaging $1.65 a download on IS, that kept them equal with SS. (SS at 25c a download but many more licenses) If that changes to 28c a download on IS, the earnings equality has just been ended. I'll be making about $5 a month at IS with the new ASA. That means serious consideration to abandoning the sinking ship while I can. Just about ready to make some changes on SS and should be moving up to higher commissions, but that doesn't matter, 3 cents isn't a huge deal breaker.
I don't mind the PP or the subs, but if they are converting all my files to cheap subs, then the sales on IS, which are diminishing already, will soon be non-existant. What's the use. I have the same files and some others left over from StockXpert days, now what will happen to those, since many are dupes. I drop IS and StockXpert, that removes me from ThinkStock, it won't make a dent in my earnings because those two have been in serious decline for a year now.
Right now I agreed and I'm in the Wait and see mode. Possibly dropping IS in Dec. I don't like to make hasty decisions or claiming my mind is made up, but that's the way I'm leaning after all the trouble of getting files onto their site. If sales improve, then I'll be forced to contiue. If sales continue to tank, there's not much to lose by leaving IS.
With all that, there's the Big One -
Feed The Beast
... as the way of the future.
Logged
arquiplay77
«
Reply #9 on:
August 30, 2011, 05:59 »
0
for me SS and FT are the big 2, some month are even in revenue, most is SS better.
Logged
Print
Home
| Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
MicrostockGroup
»
Microstock Photography Forum - General
»
General Stock Discussion
»
Big 2
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Site
Earnings Rating
Top Tier - Big 4
storyblocks
AdobeStock
Alamy
GettyImages
iStock
Shutterstock
YayImages
Vecteezy
MotionElements
Zoonar
Indivstock
PantherMedia
123RF
Dreamstime
Pond5
DepositPhotos
Canva
Pixta
ColourBox
Envato
MostPhotos
Self-Hosted
ClipDealer
Bigstockphoto
EyeEm
More Poll Results
Updated: 2025-05-10
Sponsors