Dear Microstock Agency:

It has come to my attention that in some of the photographs I have taken of myself, I did not give myself permission to use myself for commercial purposes. While I did give myself permission for some of the images and have signed model releases for myself to take pictures of myself and sell pictures of myself for myself's personal gain, I didn't give myself permission for other images and myself has uploaded those pictures of myself without my permission.

In the future, Unless I give myself permission for each image I take of myself I don't want it assumed that I gave myself my permission to use the likeness of myself in my portfolio. I appreciate your prompt attention to this aggregious error and please give all of your lawyers a raise and take it out of my earnings.

(Note: I didn't give myself permission to include that last sentence.)

Thanks for the Monday humor. Me, myself, and I approve this message.

That's the reason why IS requires a new model release for each shoot so this wouldn't happen!

Actually they don't if the image is of yourself.

From the iS guide on model releases - "The one model that we will allow a catchall release for is yourself."

After all you may have only meant to have certain images of yourself taken and not others. Some call it careful others paranoia.

Careful.  Exactly.  I mean, what if you should decide to sue yourself?  This way you are protected