pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Come on people! Signing! against AI  (Read 2068 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: May 15, 2024, 13:30 »
+1
...
I did articulate that it did not apply to 'everyone'. However, the statements are based off of actual data, correlation between specific types of people who do that, personal experience in working with/dealing a number of different races & cultures, as well as open discussions with a number of people who openly admit that's precisely the kind of thing they do - and it for the most part actually does apply to the majority. 'Stereotypes' are stereotypes for a reason, because they do tend to be accurate, or wouldn't have become a stereotype....




no, you were explicitly claiming ALL members of these groups were involved (eg calling for banning anyone with an Indian internet address, or even with an Indian name) - but since you never show your sources it's difficult to believe anything you say

and stereotypes are often based on ignorance or madness of crowds - which in the past has led to blood libel, internment camps, pogroms, lynching & used by authoritarians, both left & right, to blame the 'other'


« Reply #26 on: May 17, 2024, 05:57 »
0
this petition has been updated,this part has been added:

"If it is really not possible to add a daily/weekly or monthly upload limit,we ask Adobestock to be more strict in approving content,which often presents important artifacts or inconsistencies compared to reality".

"We are not against users who generate AI images,but given the ease and speed of production we think it is right to offer AI content responsibly and with common sense,reminding all "AI artists" that their images are generated thanks to our photographs,our illustrations and our footage".

I always think that a limit of 500 in queue is a wide limit,but at the same time it can slow down AI spammers,giving more time to be selective and work differently.

Adobe's rejections are already 30% on average,a set and known limit is the best solution,it also favors individual contributors against AI farms,because individual contributors have no hope against organized teams that produce AI in exaggerated quantities,a limit could balance this too.

but as I said before,I also think that in some way,this problem is solved at least in part by Adobe's sales system that makes everyone sell and continue to sell more as time goes by.

as I already said,I firmly believe that even billions more contents are not exactly a problem,because they are managed by Adobe's sales system.

I believe that a problem for Adobe's sales system may be more due to a greater quantity of contributors,which is certainly increasing with AI.

for the moment I remain more focused on producing "real" content,while adding AI content every now and then in small quantities.







 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
18 Replies
8531 Views
Last post February 01, 2007, 17:46
by GeoPappas
4 Replies
3775 Views
Last post May 02, 2007, 15:57
by madelaide
4 Replies
2984 Views
Last post August 12, 2014, 08:30
by fritz
1 Replies
2636 Views
Last post March 16, 2020, 18:25
by MatHayward
12 Replies
5766 Views
Last post December 12, 2021, 10:38
by Level6

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors