MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Copyright Questions  (Read 1274 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: October 06, 2013, 17:36 »
0
Hello everyone,

I have some questions pertaining to the legal side of stock photography. I have done a fairly extensive amount of research in order to gain a working knowledge of how to go about producing imagery that can be used on stock sites, yet there is still quite a bit of gray area that I cant quite clear up and I was hoping that someone on this site might be able to shed a bit of light.

1. Do you need a location permit for any landscape, or cityscape? Additionally do I need a permit for a portrait with an identifiable background, other than the modeling release?

2. I realize that logos, brand names, and individual artistic works are copyrighted but are the actual designs of mass produced items copyrighted. Items such as cups, plates, silverware, clothing, household appliances, furniture so on and so forth?
   -I know that car designs are copyrighted and as a result you can only display one third       of the car in an image without it being considered infringement, but there has to be some definitive set of rules for the items listed above?

Thanks for the time, Jeff


« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2013, 18:25 »
0
1.  Shouldn't need a permit, for the image, unless you need a permit to be in a certain location.

Depends on what is identifiable.  The Eiffel Tower at night, yes.  Random office building, not likely.

2.  Well, everything is designed by someone.  What matters is the uniqueness of the item and how litigious the company is.

« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2013, 18:31 »
0
I cannot stop thinking of IKEA while reading this topic, guess "we" are safe until something happens
« Last Edit: October 06, 2013, 18:41 by luissantos84 »

ruxpriencdiam

    This user is banned.
  • Location. Third stone from the sun
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2013, 19:32 »
-1
  -I know that car designs are copyrighted and as a result you can only display one third of the car in an image without it being considered infringement,
Not true.

« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2013, 20:03 »
0
I am only familiar with iStock / Getty interpretations of copyright restrictions -

see - http://wiki.gettyimages.com/   (or google 'istock wiki' if the link doesn't work) ...  this is not the definitive answer, but it gives a flavour, I hope...

I expect that each stock agency has their own variants on this theme, dependent on the conservatism of their approach... 

The copyright law also varies from country to country apparently, so there is no overall accepted standard, but I would expect that many agencies will adopt a 'safe' lowest-common-denominator approach, to reduce the possibility of litigation...
Regards


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
18 Replies
10049 Views
Last post May 28, 2008, 18:13
by Snufkin
1 Replies
3514 Views
Last post September 10, 2008, 10:07
by Pixart
18 Replies
7693 Views
Last post February 26, 2016, 12:37
by ShadySue
5 Replies
3177 Views
Last post March 30, 2013, 12:29
by cathyslife
26 Replies
8385 Views
Last post June 25, 2013, 12:07
by luissantos84

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors