MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Adobe stock sort by downloads research  (Read 588 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: February 02, 2024, 11:29 »
0
Following advice of microstocklife youtuber I tried to research some topics on adobe stock - typed the phrase, sorted by "downloads" to see which content for a given term/phrase is the most downloaded. Since I live in The Netherlands, I typed: "Amsterdam Netherlands".

Some results displayed on the 1st page surprised me, apart from the expected colorful cityscapes with bikes and canals, there were also photos of:
- asphalt texture
- Rolls of linen cloth
- Charging an electric car

Now obviously I am asking myself what is the connection between those photos and Amsterdam (except perhaps for the photos in question having keywords Amsterdam and Netherlands in metadata).

I dont really get it how would a buyer looking for Amsterdam, Netherlands ended up choosing a photo of an asphalt texture or rolls of linen??

Perhaps some of you, more experienced contributors have a plausible explanation?


« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2024, 12:44 »
0
I don't know how the search works exactly, but if it is sorted just by DL #, then as long as the image has the keywords it will show up in the search in the appropriate position based on total DL #.  Maybe none of the DLs came from that keyword. Also images that have been around for many years are more likely to have a higher # of downloads. Based on my own images many of the "most popular" sorts of searches are not actually ordered by the total number of downloads.

« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2024, 13:45 »
0
I don't know how the search works exactly, but if it is sorted just by DL #, then as long as the image has the keywords it will show up in the search in the appropriate position based on total DL #.  Maybe none of the DLs came from that keyword. Also images that have been around for many years are more likely to have a higher # of downloads. Based on my own images many of the "most popular" sorts of searches are not actually ordered by the total number of downloads.

Yes, it is unclear how exactly the sorting is defined. Most likely, all images that simply contain this keyword will be displayed, regardless of their position in the keyword sequence.
It's also stupid that you can't see any keywords of images and unlike Dreamstime, you can't see which keyword was used to buy your images.

So for research purposes the sorting is literaly crap.
I would do it the other way around instead.
Pick a topic and use a meaningful keyword to see how many images are found. If it's less than 100k, better 30 to 50k then it's worth creating images here.
So narrow down the topic. For example sightseeings in Amsterdam.

Otherwise you have no chance. Or you are an extremely talented photographer and can hold up against the pros.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
2512 Views
Last post August 29, 2007, 19:57
by hatman12
4 Replies
4226 Views
Last post September 08, 2014, 07:24
by ShadySue
2 Replies
2418 Views
Last post July 14, 2015, 12:13
by sweetgirll
1 Replies
3184 Views
Last post January 08, 2017, 23:08
by AnTiImAgeX
0 Replies
2553 Views
Last post December 16, 2017, 16:31
by Zero Talent

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors