pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Does one boast of XL, XXL, XXXL, XXXXXXXXL etc. in one's image titles?  (Read 3758 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: April 02, 2010, 20:38 »
0
Question for buyers or for experienced photogs - does it actually help to put in an image title that the image is XL, XXL, etc. or are multi-megapixel cameras so common that this is of relatively little worth?  And shurely most buyers are aware of how to use image size in their search criteria?


microstockphoto.co.uk

« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2010, 12:03 »
0
that would be irrelevant for a large numbers of buyers which only need pictures in web size or small print sizes: the usual minimum requirement (4 MP on most microstock sites) is more than enough for them

it may be relevant for large prints, but I'm not sure it's worth saying in the title: adding XL, XXL, et c... would make titles less readable at a glance

« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2010, 17:05 »
0
No. I'd be afraid that some buyers would think they're X-rated images.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
11 Replies
7777 Views
Last post June 19, 2007, 21:22
by yingyang0
19 Replies
5242 Views
Last post February 01, 2008, 04:33
by Mellimage
3 Replies
2713 Views
Last post March 06, 2008, 13:33
by Waldo4
4 Replies
3691 Views
Last post January 03, 2013, 19:53
by ShadySue
335 Replies
38073 Views
Last post July 06, 2016, 09:11
by trek

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors

3100 Posing Cards Bundle