MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: can 1 success bring another?  (Read 2356 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Dan

« on: December 16, 2012, 15:12 »
0
     I  made  it  in  to  Alamy  so  i  decided  to  try  SS.  If  i,m  successfull  there    i'd  thought  aboutIstock  but  all  the  negitive  replies  have  made  me  unsure.


ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2012, 15:24 »
0
You just have to keep trying.
Alamy is generally easier than iStock. I have no experience of SS, but things seem to have tightened up there too, from what I read here.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2012, 15:59 by ShadySue »

« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2012, 15:48 »
+2
Alamy is not at all exacting beyond meeting technical requirements (noise, focus, size minimums) - they don't edit the collection at all. SS will reject in a heartbeat for LCV (low commercial value) and composition. Do try to select your submission for SS very carefully, and don't just assume they'll take anything Alamy will.

iStock has a very different take on things from SS. SS likes punchy and attention grabbing; iStock prefers technical perfection even if it's a bit boring. As far as applying to iStock, look at the earnings chart on the right - they're #2 on the list. Why wouldn't you want them selling your images? They are owned by Getty and Getty behaves very badly to photographers, musicians (contributors), but they sell a lot of work.

« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2012, 16:07 »
+1
This was the deal breaker for me:

"What Does iStock Pay?
iStock pays contributors a base royalty rate of 15% for each file downloaded. If you are an Exclusive contributor you can earn up to 45%. Learn more"


Alamy is not at all exacting beyond meeting technical requirements (noise, focus, size minimums) - they don't edit the collection at all. SS will reject in a heartbeat for LCV (low commercial value) and composition. Do try to select your submission for SS very carefully, and don't just assume they'll take anything Alamy will.

iStock has a very different take on things from SS. SS likes punchy and attention grabbing; iStock prefers technical perfection even if it's a bit boring. As far as applying to iStock, look at the earnings chart on the right - they're #2 on the list. Why wouldn't you want them selling your images? They are owned by Getty and Getty behaves very badly to photographers, musicians (contributors), but they sell a lot of work.

Batman

« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2012, 17:41 »
+1
The #2 is twice the #4 money why wouldn't you want to sell there.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
14 Replies
7070 Views
Last post December 14, 2007, 08:06
by a.k.a.-tom
40 Replies
16750 Views
Last post February 17, 2010, 06:04
by FD
4 Replies
1786 Views
Last post October 16, 2012, 16:36
by tab62
6 Replies
1882 Views
Last post July 07, 2013, 14:47
by steheap
85 Replies
24222 Views
Last post September 17, 2017, 04:36
by Milleflore

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors