0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
.....I understand that Facebook cannot scroll down the page to find issues, but in the case of this page Facebook does not need to check all the page to see if there are issues, because all the page is a violation of the intellectual properties, from the top post.
Quote from: Chichikov on July 31, 2016, 03:37.....I understand that Facebook cannot scroll down the page to find issues, but in the case of this page Facebook does not need to check all the page to see if there are issues, because all the page is a violation of the intellectual properties, from the top post.It isn't to do with how long it will take. They just aren't interested in policing content in this way. They don't want to be thought of as responsible for checking content put on their site, they leave it to us to do the policing of our own work. It sucks and hopefully one day it will change, but for now if you want content removed you need to do it how I have said.
Quote from: Justanotherphotographer on July 31, 2016, 04:01Quote from: Chichikov on July 31, 2016, 03:37.....I understand that Facebook cannot scroll down the page to find issues, but in the case of this page Facebook does not need to check all the page to see if there are issues, because all the page is a violation of the intellectual properties, from the top post.It isn't to do with how long it will take. They just aren't interested in policing content in this way. They don't want to be thought of as responsible for checking content put on their site, they leave it to us to do the policing of our own work. It sucks and hopefully one day it will change, but for now if you want content removed you need to do it how I have said.Is a site legally responsible of the published content or not?
Quote from: Chichikov on July 31, 2016, 05:46Quote from: Justanotherphotographer on July 31, 2016, 04:01Quote from: Chichikov on July 31, 2016, 03:37.....I understand that Facebook cannot scroll down the page to find issues, but in the case of this page Facebook does not need to check all the page to see if there are issues, because all the page is a violation of the intellectual properties, from the top post.It isn't to do with how long it will take. They just aren't interested in policing content in this way. They don't want to be thought of as responsible for checking content put on their site, they leave it to us to do the policing of our own work. It sucks and hopefully one day it will change, but for now if you want content removed you need to do it how I have said.Is a site legally responsible of the published content or not?"15.2:If anyone brings a claim against us related to your actions, content or information on Facebook, you will indemnify and hold us harmless from and against all damages, losses, and expenses of any kind (including reasonable legal fees and costs) related to such claim. Although we provide rules for user conduct, we do not control or direct users' actions on Facebook and are not responsible for the content or information users transmit or share on Facebook. We are not responsible for any offensive, inappropriate, obscene, unlawful or otherwise objectionable content or information you may encounter on Facebook. We are not responsible for the conduct, whether online or offline, of any user of Facebook." Most sites won't deal with anyone other than the IP holder. It seems that at least some agencies also won't deal with this sort of thing unless the actual copyright holder makes the request, if even then.
"15.2:...Thus, to minimize exposure for contributory copyright infringement, websites should (a) try to reduce actual knowledge of user-generated content by not monitoring their services..."
Quote from: Chichikov on July 31, 2016, 06:57"15.2:...Thus, to minimize exposure for contributory copyright infringement, websites should (a) try to reduce actual knowledge of user-generated content by not monitoring their services..."This is their attitude, they wont check the content. They literally don't want to know because knowing would open them up to being sued. They will only respond to the actual copyright holder.
this facebook page is so useless and full of junk that i can't see who would visit it intentinally. And i think the one who created has a maximum of 1 neuron.
Quote from: andy_arden on July 31, 2016, 02:37this facebook page is so useless and full of junk that i can't see who would visit it intentinally. And i think the one who created has a maximum of 1 neuron.about half of the world population is "mononeuron"
So has anyone contacted an agency or filed a DMCA takedown yet?
once a website receives notice that a user is committing infringement, the website will be deemed to be substantially participating in the infringement if it does not remove the infringement within a reasonable period of time.
Quote from: Justanotherphotographer on July 31, 2016, 07:03Quote from: Chichikov on July 31, 2016, 06:57"15.2:...Thus, to minimize exposure for contributory copyright infringement, websites should (a) try to reduce actual knowledge of user-generated content by not monitoring their services..."This is their attitude, they wont check the content. They literally don't want to know because knowing would open them up to being sued. They will only respond to the actual copyright holder.They may not want to know but if you have notified them and they have responded to you does that not mean they are now aware and by refusing to do anything about it are substantially participatiing as per the corporate law quote by chichikov:Quote once a website receives notice that a user is committing infringement, the website will be deemed to be substantially participating in the infringement if it does not remove the infringement within a reasonable period of time.