pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Fast Company article about Pixels.com  (Read 6886 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: June 17, 2014, 13:44 »
0
I just noticed that the first page showing in RF has considerable overlap with those showing as RM. I clicked on one at random, and it's marked RF AND RM, with no obvious reason why anyone would choose to buy RM at a higher price than they're charging for full size RF, with no exclusivity.
 ::)

I had seen some like that too. I think that the person offering them hasn't got a clue what they're doing. I saw one where the RF license was cheaper and offered more rights than the RM license. It's an IQ test for the buyer.

I don't believe FAA is approving or monitoring license terms at all, so they'll let contributors do whatever they want. Sean (Mr. FAA) seems to believe he knows more than those of us who've been doing this for a decade, so I'm not inclined to take another tilt at that windmill (I participated in the discussion on FAA when this was in beta).


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
7 Replies
3924 Views
Last post October 22, 2008, 09:55
by hrhportia
12 Replies
7039 Views
Last post March 17, 2010, 02:53
by hofhoek
2 Replies
3453 Views
Last post July 07, 2010, 21:39
by RacePhoto
5 Replies
4286 Views
Last post May 02, 2011, 19:16
by RacePhoto
1 Replies
2470 Views
Last post April 08, 2014, 05:58
by Ron

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors