MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Noobie Questions  (Read 3167 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: August 06, 2008, 10:22 »
0
I minored in Photography and did some work as a photojournalist in the late 90's.  It's been about ten years since I last did any serious photography.  I'm interested in getting back into things a bit again.  Couple really basic questions:

1) I have a mid range (3MP, several years old) "advanced" point and shoot digital camera and a analogue (i.e. film) Canon SLR with some VERY nice glass.  If I shot some slow film and had it scanned would the images be marketable.  What about if I picked up a medium format used on ebay?  (Yes, I know that I could buy a new digital SLR with the money saved from a couple months of not shooting with film.)

2) What photo types sell well as microstock?  I'm seeing a lot of portfolio's with very high concentrations of studio work. 

3) Will the stock site down sample a large image file into a buyers requested resolution or do I need to upload multiples of each file?



« Last Edit: August 06, 2008, 10:45 by drop »

« Reply #2 on: August 06, 2008, 10:45 »
0
1.  Standards on micro are 4MP, so the 3MP would likely be unusable, as most agencies discourage or prohibit upsizing beyond a certain percentage (Shutterstock upsize limit is 5%).

As micro can be a volume game, a medium format film choice would be unwise. The cost of film and cost or time investment in scanning would seriously compromise your bottom line earnings. Also, scans are hard to get by review. The reviewers on services such as Shutterstock will find every dust speck that is not retouched, so there will be a frustration factor as well when trying to submit scanned. Your best bet is digital SLR and shoot raw files.

2. Model released people, business, food all sell. Pick a site like Dreamstime or Stockxpert and do a sales analysis. Search on a subject you like to shoot, and see what the sales are. On DT and StockXpert, you can readily see how many times a file has been downloaded. One of the good selling subjects across all agencies will be "woman shopping" as an example.

3. You only need to submit one size that will meet the agency guidelines. They will be resized for tiered sales by the agency and appropriate credits assigned.

« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2008, 11:00 »
0
You point and shoot is basically useless for stock.  You COULD make it work, but the images would be small and grainy and hard to get accepted... not to mention than many sites don't accept under 4 or 6 MP

Shooting film could work if you scan it well enough and don't over process it, but why are you against getting something digital?  It would save TONS of time and money in the long run.  I have heard of people having problems getting noise free scans though.

Medium format would be nice too, and the scanned files would obviously be better.

To check out what photos sell well, go to a site like shutterstock, or istock (sites with lots of sales) and search for a topic your interested in, then sort by most downloads... or most popular.  You will quickly start to see some trends.

and another site with a little helpful info:
http://www.microstockhowto.com

Hope this helps...

« Reply #4 on: August 06, 2008, 11:03 »
0
1) I have a mid range (3MP, several years old) "advanced" point and shoot digital camera and a analogue (i.e. film) Canon SLR with some VERY nice glass.  If I shot some slow film and had it scanned would the images be marketable.  What about if I picked up a medium format used on ebay?  (Yes, I know that I could buy a new digital SLR with the money saved from a couple months of not shooting with film.)


Some agencies require >=4MP so you cannot submit to all of them with a 3MP camera. When you have the a film developed, have them also create a image CD. Then scan the photos and see what creates a better result. Scanning can create noise in an image.

2) What photo types sell well as microstock?  I'm seeing a lot of portfolio's with very high concentrations of studio work.


This is a good question but not easily to answer as the type of images needed changes throughout the year. But here is a list you can start with:

business concepts and tools, business people, emotions, young adults, babies, adults, senior citizens, isolated objects, illustrations symbols and signs, sports, medicine, ...

Find the top list at the different agencies. (List of different agencies with referral links)

3) Will the stock site down sample a large image file into a buyers requested resolution or do I need to upload multiples of each file?


You upload your highest resolution, the rest is done by the agencies.

« Reply #5 on: August 06, 2008, 12:29 »
0
Well TBH I'm in East Texas right now and was thinking of shooting some Kodachrome (as Fuji and brown tones tend not to like each other so much) and get a CD from Dwayne's.

On turning a profit.  Well right now I just want to get shooting again and it'd be nice to be make back a bit of my film and processing costs.  I'll look into a digital in a bit but I'm not really impressed with the current digital Rebels and am wondering if I won't end up replacing some of the higher end cameras as often as I have to replace my computer (every two to three years).

« Reply #6 on: August 06, 2008, 12:57 »
0
Stock photography is all about making commercial images. You will not have much success selling fine art images (e.g. East Texas landscapes) in the commercial stock marketplace. Given your location you'd do well to keep your eyes open for such iconic things as cowboys on the range, oil derricks, longhorn cattle, and armadillos.

If you are serious about this you'd also do well to forget about film. Film is now only useful in making fine art images, which is not what you want to be doing if you intend to make money here. Instead of getting a new entry level camera (e.g. Canon Rebel), the better route might be to buy a used mid or pro-level one (e.g. 1Ds MkII, 5D, 30D, 20D).

You'll also have to be at least moderately familiar with Photoshop to make competitive images. Straight-out-of-the-camera stuff, for the most part, just doesn't cut it commercially.


... good luck!
« Last Edit: August 06, 2008, 13:09 by sharply_done »


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
32 Replies
45569 Views
Last post November 18, 2006, 06:31
by snapshot
13 Replies
6397 Views
Last post January 18, 2007, 16:37
by roman
18 Replies
10034 Views
Last post May 28, 2008, 18:13
by Snufkin
1 Replies
3509 Views
Last post September 10, 2008, 10:07
by Pixart
1 Replies
2532 Views
Last post April 19, 2016, 10:52
by PigsInSpace

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors