MicrostockGroup
Microstock Photography Forum - General => General Stock Discussion => Topic started by: chasmcn on June 12, 2010, 01:40
-
i was looking though gettys images of its flickr images and put a search of my own area liverpool in the uk and found this image which has been accepted with photomatix watermarks on it dont think the reviwers was alert allowing this though .http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/97743868/Flickr (http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/97743868/Flickr)
-
LOL - not cool.
-
Well at least it is not noise or chromatic aberration! ;D ;D
-
oops.
It says if you "want an image with no watermark, please sign in or register"...
-
oops.
It says if you "want an image with no watermark, please sign in or register"...
Yeah, that will remove the Getty watermark, not the photomatix one. This is hilarious :]]
-
roflmao!
-
man , and i get my getty application rejected many times..*
-
man , and i get my getty application rejected many times..
Lucky you, I didn't even get a rejection, just no answer and a cookie on my account that takes me to some dormant nearly blank landing page. >:(
Maybe I'm not being patient. Is two years too long to wait for an answer from Getty? ;D
-
Maybe I'm not being patient. Is two years too long to wait for an answer from Getty? ;D
LOL! Well they DO say that macro moves at a slower pace than micro, but two years is getting into geologic time ;D
-
man , and i get my getty application rejected many times..
Lucky you, I didn't even get a rejection, just no answer and a cookie on my account that takes me to some dormant nearly blank landing page. >:(
Maybe I'm not being patient. Is two years too long to wait for an answer from Getty? ;D
well it took a few months for me to get the answers from them. lol it's actually much faster with flickr getty