MicrostockGroup
Microstock Photography Forum - General => General Stock Discussion => Topic started by: etudiante_rapide on October 28, 2015, 12:29
-
http://www.collegehumor.com/post/7009050/guy-photoshops-himself-into-stock-photos-to-instantly-make-them-better (http://www.collegehumor.com/post/7009050/guy-photoshops-himself-into-stock-photos-to-instantly-make-them-better)
-
[url]http://www.collegehumor.com/post/7009050/guy-photoshops-himself-into-stock-photos-to-instantly-make-them-better[/url] ([url]http://www.collegehumor.com/post/7009050/guy-photoshops-himself-into-stock-photos-to-instantly-make-them-better[/url])
Pretty funny stuff!!!
-
[url]http://www.collegehumor.com/post/7009050/guy-photoshops-himself-into-stock-photos-to-instantly-make-them-better[/url] ([url]http://www.collegehumor.com/post/7009050/guy-photoshops-himself-into-stock-photos-to-instantly-make-them-better[/url])
Pretty funny stuff!!!
no, that wasnt my purpose of this thread. i think he is breaking the agreement of using stock photos
or using unauthorized stock photos. the quality of the stock photos look like the kind of work
sjlocke, yuri would do with their business category .
i thought maybe sjlocke and others in this field would recognize the person's work
and inform them so this abuse is stopped.
another possibility is in line with the large preview image size that ss is giving away.
this is the sort of abuse and piracy you encourage
-
double post
-
It's not funny, just silly (schoolboy rather than college humour); but, assuming he licensed the images, how is it abuse ?
-
lol, it's funny, though i'm not sure how would I feel if it was with my image.
But if the photos are licensed as they seem to be, I see no restriction on editing unless it's pornographic or unawful as it is included in most of the license agreements our buyers have to agree
-
It's old news, but if he licensed them, it's a fine usage.
-
evil genius 8)
-
I think some of those are very funny. Maybe I just got a schoolboy sense of humour.
-
Not that funny, but it's well done. I wouldn't classify it as abuse.