pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: shutterstock  (Read 2063 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ernstblucher

    This user is banned.
« on: July 31, 2013, 13:57 »
-11
Thanks to all the people who have vested interests with  shutterstock or work for them and disrupt normal discussions and add  negative voting.

I understand some here make a bit of money with these clowns, others are working there and some have marketing interests with them.

Have fun and continue to send pictures for few dollars a year to crook exploiting your work to make millions. They need the 99% of idiots who will never make a living out of it.



« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2013, 14:02 »
+4
This seems to be common idea for some people on this site.  The only way someone could disagree with you is if they were paid, a shill of some kind, a village idiot, a troll, (I can't even write half the things gostwyck called me, I'll get banned ;)),etc...  I think this is the biggest reason most professional and serious contributors don't join in the discussions.  A few naive and insulting people (mostly the new guys) ruin it for everyone.  I think you'll find that if you listen someone here will have some helpful advice for you but I guess that's not what you came here for is it?
« Last Edit: July 31, 2013, 14:04 by tickstock »

Donvanstaden

« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2013, 14:08 »
0
Thanks to all the people who have vested interests with  shutterstock or work for them and disrupt normal discussions and add  negative voting.

I understand some here make a bit of money with these clowns, others are working there and some have marketing interests with them.

Have fun and continue to send pictures for few dollars a year to crook exploiting your work to make millions. They need the 99% of idiots who will never make a living out of it.

-1

« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2013, 14:59 »
+2
This seems to be common idea for some people on this site.  The only way someone could disagree with you is if they were paid, a shill of some kind, a village idiot, a troll, (I can't even write half the things gostwyck called me, I'll get banned ;)),etc...  I think this is the biggest reason most professional and serious contributors don't join in the discussions.  A few naive and insulting people (mostly the new guys) ruin it for everyone.  I think you'll find that if you listen someone here will have some helpful advice for you but I guess that's not what you came here for is it?

curious that you saying so when you defend iStock like there isn't other agency in this industry, whatever they do you seem to find always the positive side, so why can't other enjoy SS?

« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2013, 15:07 »
0
curious that you saying so when you defend iStock like there isn't other agency in this industry, whatever they do you seem to find always the positive side, so why can't other enjoy SS?

I think that is the thing. Not that we don't get good and bad news that deserves extreme reactions, but when posts are overly positive or overly negative they start to lose a little validity.

« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2013, 15:14 »
+3
Thanks to all the people who have vested interests with  shutterstock or work for them and disrupt normal discussions and add  negative voting.

I understand some here make a bit of money with these clowns, others are working there and some have marketing interests with them.

Have fun and continue to send pictures for few dollars a year to crook exploiting your work to make millions. They need the 99% of idiots who will never make a living out of it.

Hey troll, if you have more fresh opinions that you want to share with world then give to thread more descriptive title. I would save few clicks and I need my mouse to be ready for uploading to Shutterstock clowns.

« Reply #6 on: July 31, 2013, 15:16 »
+1
This seems to be common idea for some people on this site.  The only way someone could disagree with you is if they were paid, a shill of some kind, a village idiot, a troll, (I can't even write half the things gostwyck called me, I'll get banned ;)),etc...  I think this is the biggest reason most professional and serious contributors don't join in the discussions.  A few naive and insulting people (mostly the new guys) ruin it for everyone.  I think you'll find that if you listen someone here will have some helpful advice for you but I guess that's not what you came here for is it?

curious that you saying so when you defend iStock like there isn't other agency in this industry, whatever they do you seem to find always the positive side, so why can't other enjoy SS?
Looks like you either didn't read what I wrote or you are trying to insult me even when I'm agreeing with you.  I don't think I said not to enjoy Shutterstock, what I said was he shouldn't be calling people names and saying they work for the company (Shutterstock) because he doesn't like what they have to say.  I also don't call people trolls, or shills, or insulting names because they like Shutterstock.  I think it's wrong to call people names just because they disagree with you, I have no problem arguing or debating though.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2013, 15:20 by tickstock »


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
Shutterstock down

Started by Greg Boiarsky Shutterstock.com

2 Replies
5764 Views
Last post March 24, 2006, 12:13
by leaf
10 Replies
8326 Views
Last post September 28, 2011, 11:28
by RacePhoto
Shutterstock at 7

Started by rubyroo Shutterstock.com

6 Replies
3944 Views
Last post January 09, 2012, 14:10
by Karimala
33 Replies
12233 Views
Last post March 01, 2012, 03:19
by borg
12 Replies
3718 Views
Last post October 06, 2012, 13:13
by Poncke

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors