pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: I am Looking for New Microstock Site to Join  (Read 11555 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: March 17, 2010, 02:07 »
0
Hello everyone. I have grown increasingly frustrated with iStockPhoto and I am considering leaving them for someone else.

I have been with iStockPhoto.com for 5 years now and I have been a contributor for the past few years. Recently the interest in some of my stock illustrations has peeked and has me becoming more focused on my Stock "career". The frustration with iStock is that the very images that sell the best for me are the same ones they reject virtually every time. Once I receive the rejection notice, I then have to contest the rejection notice, which usually results in iStockPhoto deciding to accept the image. The problem with this process is that I can submit dozens of images per week, but only contest 3 per month.

Long story short, I am looking for feedback on other Stock sites who may be easier to deal with and still yield good sell-through.
Here is a link to my work: http://www.istockphoto.com/colecom [nofollow]

Thanks for your feedback!


« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2010, 03:17 »
0
Have you tried Dreamstime? They accept all my illustrations, and they sell really well. They are my number two earning site at the moment.

Please use my referal link:http://www.dreamstime.com/resp13097-dreamtime

CofkoCof

« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2010, 03:29 »
0
All of the Big 4 sites on the right site are good, even their order seems correct (when comparing with my stats). SS does very well for me and my illustrations, it has a fast uploading process and rarely rejects good images. I highly recommend it.

My referral for shutterstock.

« Reply #3 on: March 17, 2010, 03:36 »
0
You'll have a hard time finding a site with better returns than iStock, but the 'big 4' sites are all pretty decent earniners.  I would sign up with all of them and try them out.  Start from the top of the list and work your way down until you feel you have enough sites to keep you busy :)

« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2010, 03:46 »
0
Shutterstock do better than istock for me because they accept more non vector illustrations and are also more lenient with photos.  istock reviews are strange for me, they often reject images that make hundred of dollars on the other sites.  Using scout takes a long time and I sometimes don't bother.  I like using lots of sites and these have all been worthwhile SS, FT, DT, 123rf, BS, CanStockPhoto, VMP, PM, YAY, Rodeo and recently GL are looking promising.

« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2010, 05:54 »
0
Great Portfolio Larry

As said above you could not go wrong by signing up to SS, Dreamstime and possibly Fotolia you will see very good returns there with a nice variation of Files preferred so you would be hedging your bets so to speak and imo opening doors to more possibilities and growth

All the best

« Reply #6 on: March 17, 2010, 07:44 »
0
I have been with iStockPhoto.com for 5 years now and I have been a contributor for the past few years. Recently the interest in some of my stock illustrations has peeked and has me becoming more focused on my Stock "career". The frustration with iStock is that the very images that sell the best for me are the same ones they reject virtually every time.

You've uploaded 5 3d renders since last July.  The rest of your 3d is mostly on the same subject.  Your flow backgrounds are nice, but mostly the same.   If you work a bit harder at iStock, doing a variety of 3d and working harder at your photography and not just vacation photos, it will likely pay off.  You'll find the subscription sites require you to really churn out the work, which it doesn't appear is your workflow.

« Reply #7 on: March 17, 2010, 07:56 »
0
 You'll find the subscription sites require you to really churn out the work, which it doesn't appear is your workflow.

Not necessary true. Take Anja Kaiser for example. She has about 150 vectors and submits 1-2 a month yet, half of the top weekly sellers on SS are hers.
On topic: IMHO, you should join the top 6-7 agencies if you have the time to submit. If you want to stick with just one I think IS is still your best choice.

« Reply #8 on: March 17, 2010, 08:14 »
0
You should certainly upload to Shutterstock. I won't give you my referral link since this is an honest advice. You will enjoy a honeymoon period at Shutterstock up till 6 months after registration. Use that period well, and upload at least 50/100 images per month, not more. Extend your exposure by giving them 20-40 images per week after that. Resist the tempatation to upload your full port at once.

« Reply #9 on: March 17, 2010, 08:16 »
0
Please feel free to browse my blog http://microstockexperiment.blogspot.com/ to look at the agencies I submit too. I send only photos though. I think you could do well at Graphic leftovers with your work, easy upload as well
Good luck
L

RacePhoto

« Reply #10 on: March 17, 2010, 14:38 »
0
I'm only spamming the thread because you asked, but 3D studio may be interesting to you? They aren't big however they seem to pay a fair percentage well when people do get sales.

http://www.the3dstudio.com/default.aspx?id_affiliate=474369

Edit: I'm on five sites and one of those is Alamy, two of them are not DT or FT!  8)

Four micros of the six that count.
« Last Edit: March 18, 2010, 12:57 by RacePhoto »

« Reply #11 on: March 17, 2010, 17:32 »
0
Funny... I just got done asking Race this question in a private email...LOL
I'm only really active on DT,  BigStock,  SS  & IS,  the only 4 where any money is coming in on a regular basis..   StockXpert was sending me checks... but no more... on 3 others but no money to be made for me there.
    Been down the road on many many more....some I eventually dropped, others shriveled up and blew away ....
    I too am looking for something new, something fresh.  Anyone with any ideas, I'm all ears. 8)=tom

lisafx

« Reply #12 on: March 17, 2010, 17:43 »
0
@ Tom, I am on 7 sites, down from 9 after dropping Crestock and Veer.  But the only ones that produce any kind of steady returns are the top 4.   

« Reply #13 on: March 17, 2010, 17:59 »
0
Tom, Graphicleftovers is quite fresh I think, got few sales already and upload is very easy especially with Isyndica

L

« Reply #14 on: March 17, 2010, 19:29 »
0
Definitely if you have 3d renders go to http://www.the3dstudio.com also Graphic Leftovers http://www.graphicleftovers.com is good too but email support and ask for an ftp account as contributors have had problems with the html upload system (I found this out the hard way).  I'm currently apart of SS, DT, FT, GL, 3d, Cutcaster and deposit photos.  I'm part of another one but am going to drop them as they rejected almost half of my portfolio esp the ones that sell well on the other sites.

Good luck with what you decide to go with.

Anita

microstockphoto.co.uk

« Reply #15 on: March 18, 2010, 10:17 »
0
Hello everyone. I have grown increasingly frustrated with iStockPhoto and I am considering leaving them for someone else.

Unless you're really angry at them for some reason, why not just leaving your pictures there and joining other sites as well?

Exclusivity (whichever site you choose) is hardly profitable in my opinion; the only advantage is less work uploading.

If you stick to the major sites (ss, ft, dt, is), you can earn more with a little additional work.

« Reply #16 on: March 18, 2010, 11:25 »
0
You absolutely have to be on several sites or you're wasting your time.  Even if exclusivity earned a much higher return,  reviews are getting steadily tougher so you can't count on getting enough images accepted at one place.

I just submitted  some images to DT, SS, and FT and the results were wildly different.  SS rejected half.  FT accepted the ones SS rejected, and rejected what SS accepted;  DT accepted them all.  The images were really not that variable in quality. I used to submit to IS only the ones that DS, SS and FT all accepted; now even that won't work.

And the rejections at all the sites have become stranger:  "artifacts" on level 12 JPGs,  "too feathered" on images that were never postprocessed, "focus" on tack sharp images, etc.   One site sees noise, others don't.  And all of the sites are rejecting more for "aesthetic quality", "common subjects", and what they perceive as possible trademark issues.


Here is my suggestion to these microstocks: promise exclusives that their rejection notices would include A CLIP OF THE PROBLEM AREA so they at least have a chance of ultimately getting a high percentage of images accepted. 


« Reply #17 on: March 18, 2010, 11:58 »
0
Talk about strange...now ALL of my uploads are being ACCEPTED! I must have gotten suddenly super-good.

I agree that faced with so many off-the-wall rejections and quickly contorting stock sites you'd have to be nutty to go exclusive with any one site. Like selling all your product to Walmart--you're out of business and not even know it.

IMHO our only strength (read: security) is in the number of decent (top 6) outlets.

« Reply #18 on: March 18, 2010, 12:00 »
0
@ Tom, I am on 7 sites, down from 9 after dropping Crestock and Veer.  But the only ones that produce any kind of steady returns are the top 4.   

+1.  Exact same answer.

« Reply #19 on: March 18, 2010, 13:21 »
0
Funny... I just got done asking Race this question in a private email...LOL
I'm only really active on DT,  BigStock,  SS  & IS,  the only 4 where any money is coming in on a regular basis..   StockXpert was sending me checks... but no more... on 3 others but no money to be made for me there.
    Been down the road on many many more....some I eventually dropped, others shriveled up and blew away ....
    I too am looking for something new, something fresh.  Anyone with any ideas, I'm all ears. 8)=tom

Hi,
After the loss of StockXpert I researched market and picked Canstockphoto. But the only ones that produce steady returns are the top 4 same as for Lisafx.
Good luck with what you decide to go with.

Kone

« Reply #20 on: March 18, 2010, 13:35 »
0
Top4 + 123RF :-)

microstockphoto.co.uk

« Reply #21 on: March 18, 2010, 16:10 »
0
Hi,
After the loss of StockXpert I researched market and picked Canstockphoto. But the only ones that produce steady returns are the top 4 same as for Lisafx.
Good luck with what you decide to go with.
Kone

the big 4 are in a class in their own;

besides those:

canstock has few sales, but luckily some pictures sell at about $20 (from fotosearch partners);
even 123RF and BS are not too bad - worth a try;
some sales on veer, but I'm a bit disappointed; furthermore, rejections are very random on that site

I'm sorry to say that the other sites I tried are probably a waste of time:
crestock (very few sales), yaymicro (almost no sales), cutcaster (no sales at all), mostphotos (no sales at all)

« Reply #22 on: March 18, 2010, 21:17 »
0
WOW! Thanks for all the feedback. I do have one other question... I have an exclusive with iStockPhoto.com, but that only applies to images that they have accepted right?? I mean, just because I have an exclusive there doesn't mean I can't submit different images somewhere else does it? Thanks!

« Reply #23 on: March 18, 2010, 21:35 »
0
WOW! Thanks for all the feedback. I do have one other question... I have an exclusive with iStockPhoto.com, but that only applies to images that they have accepted right?? I mean, just because I have an exclusive there doesn't mean I can't submit different images somewhere else does it? Thanks!
You cannot sell royalty free licenses anywhere else while you are exclusive. This applies to rejects and to things never submitted to them.

PaulieWalnuts

  • We Have Exciting News For You
« Reply #24 on: March 18, 2010, 21:45 »
0
WOW! Thanks for all the feedback. I do have one other question... I have an exclusive with iStockPhoto.com, but that only applies to images that they have accepted right?? I mean, just because I have an exclusive there doesn't mean I can't submit different images somewhere else does it? Thanks!
Sort of. Exclusive means you are an exclusive contributor for Royalty Free images and that you only submit RF licensed images to them. You can submit Rights Managed images elsewhere but you need to be careful because there's some loosely worded restrictions. Like for similars as an example.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
1 Replies
5774 Views
Last post March 11, 2008, 09:52
by Pixart
45 Replies
17318 Views
Last post August 18, 2009, 14:48
by clustershot
2 Replies
4424 Views
Last post September 27, 2009, 11:25
by Dreamframer
34 Replies
14093 Views
Last post April 06, 2011, 05:45
by visceralimage
4 Replies
4040 Views
Last post June 21, 2013, 13:20
by tickstock

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors