pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: SS rejections 100%  (Read 16036 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #50 on: January 02, 2014, 11:42 »
+5
That is truly ludicrous. So with each submission you are supposed to show a diversity of styles and skills? So if someone is a successful people/object/wildlife tog, they have to shoot different styles with each upload?

Honestly, the more I hear of SS, the less I'd want anything to do with them. (But never say 'never', in case you have to eat your words one day.)

It seems that if any one company reaches a superior position, they think they can mess contributors around as much as they like.


« Reply #51 on: January 02, 2014, 11:49 »
+5
Sue, I guarantee you that ss is much nicer to work with than what you are used to.
also rejection wise, we get minority reports here, and we dont see many of the pictures so nobody can judge and everybody can have their say.
Again show us the pictures, else such a thread is meaningless.

Shelma1

  • stockcoalition.org
« Reply #52 on: January 02, 2014, 12:32 »
+7
From a vector person's POV, I think you guys are beating yourselves up and second-guessing yourselves for no reason. Honestly, when an entire batch of my illustration jpgs are rejected for some ridiculous reason like "noise" while the vectors are accepted, it's clear to me the photo inspectors (or a few photo inspectors) are off their rockers. Either that or there's some incentive we don't know about for them to make mass rejections.

« Reply #53 on: January 02, 2014, 15:02 »
+1
From a vector person's POV, I think you guys are beating yourselves up and second-guessing yourselves for no reason. Honestly, when an entire batch of my illustration jpgs are rejected for some ridiculous reason like "noise" while the vectors are accepted, it's clear to me the photo inspectors (or a few photo inspectors) are off their rockers. Either that or there's some incentive we don't know about for them to make mass rejections.

right - that's much closer to  the probable reason, and that's why seeing the actual rejects is irrelevant when the same images are accepted elsewhere or as similar by SS - the problem is with reviewers, not the content -- I submit my shoots spread over several batches -- every so often, mostly weekends, an entire batch gets rejected (right now usually for lighting or composition), while the next batch, with similar images, gets accepted;  so for me, overall, it's annoying, but some of the shoot eventually gets accepted. 

since we can't predict which images will get rejected, it becomes necessary to submit more similars than normally, since I don't re-submit without making changes

OM

« Reply #54 on: January 02, 2014, 19:24 »
0
Well, I dunno! Submitted 5 similar food shots on 29/12, 100% accepted on 30/12. Maybe they want food and other subjects less. I dunno.

« Reply #55 on: January 02, 2014, 19:51 »
+2
I've completely quit and have no plan to resume any time soon.  Just not worth the aggravation anymore.   Especially since every "exciting new opportunity" from here on out will be 35  cents, like the FB deal.   Deal me out.

« Reply #56 on: January 03, 2014, 07:11 »
0
FWIW my rejections were wildlife (African) and landscape (European).

Tryingmybest

  • Stand up for what is right
« Reply #57 on: January 03, 2014, 12:29 »
0
I do my own illustrations and I submit for a photographer. Some person(s) on SS review team is going nuts with the reject button the past few weeks. Their comments are totally unhelpfuland in some cases totally ridiculous. It's part of the regular ebb and flow of subjective judgements. Make sure your pix are sharp, logos cleaned up and releases are correct. Maybe make some changes and resubmit. Also submit to other agencies. SS is not the only one that will make you money. 8)

The last 2 weeks in SS  I have had ALL images rejected for same reasons-POOR lighting, INCORRECT white balance, POOR composition- and I am utterly at a loss after spending HOURS in RAW Bridge and PS ! What is the problem? I am thinking of not submitting any more.
PS-similar images accepted in recent past.Is it a BOT or WHAT???

« Reply #58 on: January 03, 2014, 12:34 »
0
The trend for me that I am seeing is that SS is becoming more like FT in terms of what they accept/reject for nature/landscape/wildlife images.  They are probably so saturated in this category that you have to really shine if you want anything accepted.  Point, shoot, upload is no longer acceptable at least for the big four.  I am just back from a trip and I have maybe 100 new nature scenic images and more if you count my underwater stuff.  I am not expecting a big acceptance across the board except for the underwater work, which also isn't a giant selling subject.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
11 Replies
6901 Views
Last post April 26, 2020, 10:57
by Uncle Pete
4 Replies
13715 Views
Last post March 16, 2022, 15:21
by Uncle Pete
14 Replies
5171 Views
Last post April 07, 2022, 13:27
by Uncle Pete
14 Replies
7127 Views
Last post May 28, 2023, 09:29
by Injustice for all
258 Replies
42022 Views
Last post August 11, 2023, 06:22
by Injustice for all

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors