i'm surprised so many here are surprised.
the RF licence was a ripoff for photographers since day 1.
however, even when selling RM it's not much easier to protect your images unless you're ready to sue people all around the world.
RM is obsolete and anachronistic nowadays but RF is too much permissive, it's impossible to chase all the abusers let alone being paid back without investing a huge amount of time and money.
in plus, agencies dont move a finger as it wouldnt be profitable for them.
solutions ? none so far, unless the infringer is a rich publisher with deep pockets from a western country.
and i'm not surprised agencies are relaxed about buyers abusing the RF licence, they pushed RF as the "do what you want" licence to solve all the burocracy of RM and the buyers took it literally without realizing RF has in fact many limitations but if they became aware of this they would not buy RF in droves as they do now.