MicrostockGroup

Microstock Photography Forum - General => General Stock Discussion => Topic started by: Carl on June 29, 2013, 10:35

Title: Model Release, but no Property Release
Post by: Carl on June 29, 2013, 10:35
I have some photos of a model, for whom I have a signed release, at a tourist attraction, for which I do not have a property release, so the photos will be uploaded as editorial.  I'm wondering if I should include the model release.
Title: Re: Model Release, but no Property Release
Post by: disorderly on June 29, 2013, 10:40
I'd include the release.  It's up to the client to decide if they can use your images without a property release.  Is there any downside from their point of view if there's a model release?  I can't imagine any, so it's all upside.
Title: Re: Model Release, but no Property Release
Post by: ruxpriencdiam on June 29, 2013, 12:06
No release required for Editorial!

Quote
so the photos will be uploaded as editorial.
Title: Re: Model Release, but no Property Release
Post by: Ron on June 29, 2013, 12:43
I have some photos of a model, for whom I have a signed release, at a tourist attraction, for which I do not have a property release, so the photos will be uploaded as editorial.  I'm wondering if I should include the model release.
Thats what I do as well. If I need both but only have one, I will attach the ones I do have. On Alamy that works fine.