pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Model Release, but no Property Release  (Read 2189 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Carl

  • Carl Stewart, CS Productions
« on: June 29, 2013, 10:35 »
0
I have some photos of a model, for whom I have a signed release, at a tourist attraction, for which I do not have a property release, so the photos will be uploaded as editorial.  I'm wondering if I should include the model release.


« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2013, 10:40 »
0
I'd include the release.  It's up to the client to decide if they can use your images without a property release.  Is there any downside from their point of view if there's a model release?  I can't imagine any, so it's all upside.

ruxpriencdiam

    This user is banned.
  • Location. Third stone from the sun
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2013, 12:06 »
-1
No release required for Editorial!

Quote
so the photos will be uploaded as editorial.

Ron

« Reply #3 on: June 29, 2013, 12:43 »
0
I have some photos of a model, for whom I have a signed release, at a tourist attraction, for which I do not have a property release, so the photos will be uploaded as editorial.  I'm wondering if I should include the model release.
Thats what I do as well. If I need both but only have one, I will attach the ones I do have. On Alamy that works fine.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
3 Replies
3728 Views
Last post April 21, 2006, 13:10
by leaf
17 Replies
8310 Views
Last post August 17, 2010, 10:48
by Anyka
9 Replies
5271 Views
Last post April 21, 2011, 14:56
by Renata L
7 Replies
2272 Views
Last post September 16, 2013, 08:30
by gillian vann
11 Replies
1555 Views
Last post April 08, 2019, 13:53
by Uncle Pete

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results