Author Topic: Model Release, but no Property Release (Read 5761 times)

Carl · « **on:** June 29, 2013, 10:35 »

I have some photos of a model, for whom I have a signed release, at a tourist attraction, for which I do not have a property release, so the photos will be uploaded as editorial. I'm wondering if I should include the model release.

disorderly · « **Reply #1 on:** June 29, 2013, 10:40 »

I'd include the release. It's up to the client to decide if they can use your images without a property release. Is there any downside from their point of view if there's a model release? I can't imagine any, so it's all upside.

ruxpriencdiam · « **Reply #2 on:** June 29, 2013, 12:06 »

No release required for Editorial!

Quote

so the photos will be uploaded as editorial.

Ron · « **Reply #3 on:** June 29, 2013, 12:43 »

Quote from: Carl on June 29, 2013, 10:35

I have some photos of a model, for whom I have a signed release, at a tourist attraction, for which I do not have a property release, so the photos will be uploaded as editorial. I'm wondering if I should include the model release.

Thats what I do as well. If I need both but only have one, I will attach the ones I do have. On Alamy that works fine.

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Model Release, but no Property Release (Read 5761 times)

Carl

disorderly

ruxpriencdiam

Ron

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors