MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: New megapixl.com from Dreamstime. Why?  (Read 11560 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: April 12, 2016, 13:23 »
0
Looks like just the subscription options from the normal Dreamstime site, without credit expiration. Different video options. Not really sure what the point of this site is. Some "Machine learning" benefit...  https://www.megapixl.com/

---

NASHVILLE, Tenn., April 12, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- Dreamstime, the world's largest community in stock photography, announced today the launch of Megapixl.com, a new website that utilizes machine learning to offer more refined stock image choices based on past user behaviors. This artificial intelligence (AI) utilizes data garnered from all of the Dreamstime sites regarding which content is the most relevant and suitable for the individual user.

Dreamstime analyzes user-driven Big Data that is collected into its main AI from across its library of websites and across multiple electronic devices. It then leverages that information to recommend Megapixl.com images to designers based on the actions of other aggregated user decisions. The end result is a more engaging and relevant user experience. The system "learns" user preferences over time, and will give higher priority ratings to content that is most suitable to the individual user.

Available on a subscription basis, Megapixl.com features the most attractive stock image subscriptions in the industry. The initial collection on Megapixl.com is curated based on editor's feedback and customer behaviors that rate images and place them within certain ranks in the collection. Once the site is launched, the machine learning platform will take gathered user data into account and offer refinements to the Dreamstime.com main site. Content on the site includes photos, vector art, and video content representing several categories including abstract, business, people, editorial, 2D & 3D Animation, Video Production Elements, Technology, and Travel.

"By launching MegaPixl we give users access to an incredible collection that is curated by humans and then further improved and customized by machine learning tools that learn past behaviors to make dynamic recommendations," said Serban Enache, CEO and co-founder, Dreamstime. "The initial collection on Megapixl is already curated because we've accounted for user's actions so we know how images will be rated and placed within the collection. Megapixl is designed as a first stop for designers because we are effectively using the designer community to help itself by basing the collection on designer behaviors. Users will come to the site to find the right image quickly giving them more time to focus on their designs."

The site will offer a 30 Day Free Trial that will provide new customers with the opportunity to experience the difference of the new image gallery available on Megapixl.com.



« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2016, 13:49 »
+2
I did a test search (picked a term where I know a set of my images show up on DT) and the results were 8,713 on Megapixl versus 14,265 on DT - so slightly more than half

I am opted out of DT's partner program - and this doesn't seem like a partner site to me as it's DT's own company - so possibly that's why none of my images appear to be there.

On DT, with 200 images per page, I have 11 on the first page sorted by most relevant, 6 sorted by Best Selling and 5 by Most Downloaded. In other words, it's not that I have no popular content. So what is the basis for selecting whose work gets on this new site?

The pricing page says that 750 images a month will be $219

https://www.megapixl.com/subscription-plans

Shutterstock is $249 if you just buy one month ($199/month annual plan). Why would you go for many fewer images on Megapixl? Is SS search really so awful and Megapixl's so much better?

I really don't get it (or why they didn't send something out to contributors about this)

« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2016, 14:11 »
+1
My content is marked as exclusive there  >:(

« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2016, 14:30 »
+6
They spelt pixel wrong  ;D

« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2016, 15:29 »
0
A way of testing the "new" search technology without breaking their main site?

« Reply #5 on: April 12, 2016, 15:35 »
0
Is SS search really so awful and Megapixl's so much better?

This might be it!

In some of my older posts I speculated that, when search becomes an issue for customers (a consequence of the ever growing collection size), specialized services will appear to meet the demand.

And there is definitely a market for curated collections. Busy customers are already ready to pay extra for getting fast, the best and exactly what they need. This is one of the reasons why SS is able to charge more for those expensive SODs.

The big question is why launching a new brand (with the associated costs) instead of implementing a new "intelligent" "curated search" inside Dreamstime?

Now, only time will tell if a collection curated automatically can be competitive. If this will be the case, we will slowly kiss goodbye those expensive SS SODs.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2016, 15:42 by Zero Talent »

« Reply #6 on: April 12, 2016, 15:43 »
0
The only reason there is a need for curated collections is the awfulness of the inspection process across all sites. I can see it makes a lot of sense to use AI to analyse customer behaviour but I would have thought the intervention of humans would be too expensive that's one reason why Macrostock costs more..........So with SODS are these "found" for customers I never knew that

« Reply #7 on: April 12, 2016, 17:39 »
0
Is SS search really so awful and Megapixl's so much better?
Now, only time will tell if a collection curated automatically can be competitive. If this will be the case, we will slowly kiss goodbye those expensive SS SODs.

as far as in my own case,
--dt is dead , has been in comatose for months, .. no, years !!!
--ss expensive SODs ... has already been kissing me goodbye for months... almost a year now.
but i don't know if it's due to what you call collection-curation.

« Reply #8 on: April 12, 2016, 21:28 »
0
No idea how this new offering is going to change things on DT but I guess that given how the microstock- sphere is in trouble they are trying to come up with ways to attract new customers. Don't see how this is going to help, however.

It's funny that when Fine Art America started a companion site they called it pixels.com - some consultant out there must be telling sites that pixels is a popular name, it seems. IMHO I can't imagine anyone searching for "pixels" when they want art or stock photography but I'm not marketing guru LOL.

I did a couple of searches by place name - one word searches - and found my best sellers on the first page and others on page two. I'm still getting fairly regular if erratic sales on DT despite my tiny portfolio there, but haven't uploaded anything new in ages.

Thanks to the OP for letting us know about this.



THP Creative

  • THP Creative

« Reply #9 on: April 13, 2016, 00:34 »
0
Found my stuff on there, thanks to the OP though, hadn't heard about it before this.

WHY did they make it look so bad though? Its certainly not an attractive site.

« Reply #10 on: April 13, 2016, 03:13 »
+2
"dreamstime, the world's largest community in stock photography"

What's the point of blatantly lying? Having fun announcing their dishonesty?

« Reply #11 on: April 13, 2016, 04:56 »
0
"dreamstime, the world's largest community in stock photography"

What's the point of blatantly lying? Having fun announcing their dishonesty?

It's right there on the homepage when you're not logged in. I guess they're dreaming. :D

« Reply #12 on: April 13, 2016, 07:59 »
0
"dreamstime, the world's largest community in stock photography"

What's the point of blatantly lying? Having fun announcing their dishonesty?

It's right there on the homepage when you're not logged in. I guess they're dreaming. :D

I don't get why ANYONE would support DT on the video side for clips as low as 20 cents.  Even with photos, for that matter, it's hard to grasp. I haven't had a 20 cent sale and most of my sub sales are regular sub rates, but man if a .20 cent takes off, that would be a whopping .06 cents royalty. As I've mentioned in several threads my income was cut in half literally over a month and when I inquired they said that DT changed the search to give everyone fair exposure, so you will see ups and downs in your income. So forget good keyboarding as a competitive angle, forget content quality as a competitive angle, forget upload frequency as a competitive angle and forget portfolio size as a competitive angle. DT CONTROLS, by their own admittance, our destiny......I suppose like most other agencies. But they admit to it and that's the difference.

« Reply #13 on: April 13, 2016, 08:25 »
0
"dreamstime, the world's largest community in stock photography"

What's the point of blatantly lying? Having fun announcing their dishonesty?

It's right there on the homepage when you're not logged in. I guess they're dreaming. :D

I don't get why ANYONE would support DT on the video side for clips as low as 20 cents.  Even with photos, for that matter, it's hard to grasp. I haven't had a 20 cent sale and most of my sub sales are regular sub rates, but man if a .20 cent takes off, that would be a whopping .06 cents royalty. As I've mentioned in several threads my income was cut in half literally over a month and when I inquired they said that DT changed the search to give everyone fair exposure, so you will see ups and downs in your income. So forget good keyboarding as a competitive angle, forget content quality as a competitive angle, forget upload frequency as a competitive angle and forget portfolio size as a competitive angle. DT CONTROLS, by their own admittance, our destiny......I suppose like most other agencies. But they admit to it and that's the difference.

I agree. I wasn't referring to the 20 cents though with the attached image, I was referring to them saying they are "the world's largest community in stock photos", which as mentioned can't possibly be true considering how much bigger other stock sites are. You need to click on the attached image to enlarge the image and then you can see the text clearly, right below where it mentions 20 cents.

« Reply #14 on: April 13, 2016, 09:36 »
+5
I contacted DT support yesterday to ask why my portfolio was not on Megapixl, mentioning that I opted out of partnerships but this wasn't a partner site as DT owned it. Their answer was that it was a different web site, only subscriptions, and if they included everyone's images "... we'd  have a lot of angry contributors who are mainly expecting credits sales. "

"Megapixl  belong to the same
company but it is not the same website. It doesn't sell the same plans
as  on Dreamstime. You need to participate in the alliances program to
have  your  portfolio there as well I'm afraid. The website is selling
only  subscription  plans.  If  we  would  upload  there  all  images,
regarding  of  alliances  program  options,  we'd  have a lot of angry
contributors who are mainly expecting credits sales. "

I get mostly subscriptions on DT and I can't imagine I'm the only one. I don't like that - they've never managed to make a go of their foray into subscriptions - but that's not why I opted out of partnerships. I opted out because I object to multiple agencies taking a cut of what the buyer pays, leaving the person who created the image even less than the normal small royalty.

I can't see Megapixl going anywhere, so I'll probably just leave this alone, but thought anyone else who was not there might like to know why. However if I did care about it, I think I'd argue with them about the fundamental difference between partner sites and new ventures of the agency (multiple agency bites at the apple versus just one) and suggest they create a separate opt out if they really think that subscriptions on DT versus subscriptions at Megapixl are different enough to warrant it.

« Reply #15 on: April 13, 2016, 11:22 »
+1
Everyone now wants their product or service tagged with "AI" in some way.  Too bad there actually isn't any. 

« Reply #16 on: April 13, 2016, 11:33 »
+3
some consultant out there must be telling sites that pixels is a popular name, it seems. IMHO I can't imagine anyone searching for "pixels" when they want art or stock photography but I'm not marketing guru LOL.


consultant, LMAO... yes, i remember decades ago in the prime of my life, i was head of one of the top AV business in the country, if not the world, and they too brought in a
consultant
who suggested laying off everyone including the top selling people and including the
CEO who made the business.
he went home to put a bullet through his head,
and karmic payoff was the business went broke and no longer exist.

to me , and many business ppl with encounter of consultant
know that the moment a business brings in a consultant
it is like shaman coming in to bleed the company of every penny with their bs.


« Reply #17 on: April 13, 2016, 15:43 »
0
My content is marked as exclusive there  >:(


Mine too ??? I've started a thread on the DT forum asking about the commission we get via the new site and also mentioned the "exclusive" thing in a second post. No response from DT as yet, but here is the link for future referencehttp://www.dreamstime.com/thread_44637
Regards, David.

BD

« Reply #18 on: April 13, 2016, 16:04 »
0
I hope we are getting paid for all the free images

« Reply #19 on: April 13, 2016, 17:29 »
+1
I hope we are getting paid for all the free images

If it's subscription sales only I'm glad to be auto-opted out. 

« Reply #20 on: April 14, 2016, 11:28 »
0
The best swindles are simple. They rely less on sophistication of design and more on the universal, timeless appeal of greed. A swindle should appear plausible, but at the same time its victims should be made to feel like insiders granted the opportunity to make a quick buck.

Now that people are hooked into the Microstock deal, the game needs to have new ways to keep the suckers interested in making more money.

« Reply #21 on: April 20, 2016, 10:01 »
+2
Hi there,

I'm new here, but i've been already on microstock agencies since 2008. And the theme with megapixl.com is very actual for me.

I haven't any sale on dreamstime.com since 12th april. I've already talking to Dreamstime support and they have promised me to delete my portfolio from all partner sites. But still some photos are enable to buy on megapixl.com, one of them are most popular on other microstock agencies and I've even deactivated them for some time on dreamstime.com. And they give them downloading for free. I really dissapointed. Today support hasn't even reply me still. Have no idea what to do.. I don't want to cooperate with this "partner".

Does anyone have the same problem?


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
5888 Views
Last post May 20, 2015, 02:30
by dpimborough
4 Replies
4687 Views
Last post April 27, 2006, 06:29
by CJPhoto
Dreamstime is down

Started by Greg Boiarsky Dreamstime.com

4 Replies
4968 Views
Last post May 17, 2006, 00:57
by phildate
4 Replies
4664 Views
Last post May 26, 2006, 19:44
by madelaide
2 Replies
5508 Views
Last post March 16, 2019, 17:31
by Jo Ann Snover

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors