pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Nikon to Canon or Canon to Nikon  (Read 8153 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DC


« Reply #25 on: May 26, 2013, 13:32 »
0
These really old threads should be in a different color or something to make them easier to identify.  I read over half of this before realizing it was so old.


« Reply #26 on: May 26, 2013, 13:36 »
0
But the principles are still the same

« Reply #27 on: May 26, 2013, 17:04 »
0
Guys, you are replying to 3 1/2 year old comments, technology in cameras has advanced a whole lot since then.

It has? I don't think so.

I'm still shooting with my old 5D mk II because I didn't find 5D mk III that much better. (Waiting for the mk IV... :))

And the Canon vs. Nikon is still continuing... :)
« Last Edit: May 26, 2013, 17:07 by Perry »

« Reply #28 on: May 26, 2013, 17:37 »
0
I shoot Canon because..... well when I was switching from manual focus to auto focus ( many years ago) the Canon lens were silent, Nikons made noise. That was the only difference at the time... and now neither or any other DSLR is different enough to change manufacture.... Really there isn't a camera maker making bad gear these days... they can't afford to.

Poncke v2

« Reply #29 on: May 27, 2013, 03:38 »
0
Guys, you are replying to 3 1/2 year old comments, technology in cameras has advanced a whole lot since then.

It has? I don't think so.

I'm still shooting with my old 5D mk II because I didn't find 5D mk III that much better. (Waiting for the mk IV... :))

And the Canon vs. Nikon is still continuing... :)
Do you have GPS on your MKII? I see more and more location orientated agencies and websites. With embedded GPS that makes things a whole lot easier. Canon 6D definitely has more advanced features and the low light performance is a lot better then the MKII so I've heard


« Reply #30 on: May 27, 2013, 04:10 »
+1
I am staying with Canon mainly because this is what I (or better: we, as my wife shoots with Canon as well) had from the start. We bought our first digital SLR in 2003 when, the Canon 300D was more or less the only affordable model. Over time we upgraded (30D, 1DMkIIn, 1DMkIV) and added a lot of glass.
Now a switch to another manufacturer would mean we had to replace all those lenses - that's the main reason I don't even look at Nikon for new cameras.
And one additional point: I am now using a 1DMkIV. I fully believe the capabilities of that camera are far beyond my own capabilities. Hoping to improve my photography by switching to another camera body is completely pointless. I'd rather invest the time improving my own skills. My camera is not the limiting factor.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
28 Replies
10163 Views
Last post October 02, 2007, 10:37
by KiwiRob
8 Replies
4532 Views
Last post June 09, 2008, 12:39
by basti
5 Replies
10555 Views
Last post September 30, 2008, 10:37
by JC-SL
39 Replies
11328 Views
Last post March 31, 2009, 03:14
by RaFaLe
8 Replies
3522 Views
Last post January 15, 2010, 12:35
by Eyedesign

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors

3100 Posing Cards Bundle