pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Worst photo you came acroos on any of the agencies  (Read 10968 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: October 15, 2017, 03:56 »
0
Quote
I did that bout 90% accepted and some selling quite OK

I dislike digging through old pics to find something half decent. Once in a while I'll do it and re-work on something special, as the attached from 2012. In hindsight, I butchered the post-processing the first time round.

I rather shoot new stuff.
I kept it simple and uploaded everything rejected it was all ready keyworded etc. so much more efficient than actually looking at my images. I let the customer decide whats quality once i've done the work. Anyone's opinion of whether they are the best or worst ever is meaningless unless they want to pay me ;-)


Semmick Photo

« Reply #26 on: October 15, 2017, 04:10 »
+3

rinderart

« Reply #27 on: October 16, 2017, 00:34 »
0
Ron, Actually only one....Mike took a TON of our Jokes and Kidding for years. he came to my first seminar in 2007, he was at My House. We had Lunch many times.. we had a lot of fun But, Truthfully If you made half what he makes and made you would be a different person. personal style aside he made a Lot of Money and still does. He was and is the  classic example of what Penny stock really is. Your a good example of that also But you'll never match His work ethic..And Im glad I helped you get approved and the baby is adorable. Congrats.. All 3 parts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGUdYltly3E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KW-CYGNEgXA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIfB2x5yLX8

« Reply #28 on: October 16, 2017, 01:22 »
0
I met Mike at that 2007 seminar. He's become a friend and can tell you that he couldn't care less what you think of him or his art. And I guarantee he makes more with a camera than most people posting here.

We work together a couple times a year and are in the process of putting together a shoot right now. Anyone who's worked with him will tell you he's a great collaborator and generous with his time and expertise. He is full of ideas - some quirky, but often he gets it right on the money.

« Reply #29 on: October 16, 2017, 02:00 »
+2
No doubt he's a great guy and has made a lot of money (in the past), but portfolios like that are the very reason the word "stock" has become synonymous with cheap, cheesy and low quality photography.

« Reply #30 on: October 16, 2017, 03:39 »
+1
Ron, Actually only one....Mike took a TON of our Jokes and Kidding for years. he came to my first seminar in 2007, he was at My House. We had Lunch many times.. we had a lot of fun But, Truthfully If you made half what he makes and made you would be a different person. personal style aside he made a Lot of Money and still does. He was and is the  classic example of what Penny stock really is. Your a good example of that also But you'll never match His work ethic..And Im glad I helped you get approved and the baby is adorable. Congrats.. All 3 parts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGUdYltly3E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KW-CYGNEgXA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIfB2x5yLX8

https://www.scribendi.com/advice/capitalization.en.html

« Reply #31 on: October 16, 2017, 18:49 »
+1
i am a member in to this photography club and each week they show us work from known photographers.today it was a screening of some american photographer who used some different tecnicks for her portraits.The half of the people in the club didnt like her work .her portraits looked dull and bit boring sometimes.but on the other hand she gained racognition and fame thanks to this special techic she is using.
so in the end of the day is quite subjective whats ev fav cup of tea.
some users in the DT forums they like to brag for their acceptance rate showing some images,well some of them looked underexposed or overexposed but they were accepted and i guess they sold somewhere
so who am i to judge what image fits best in every agency.
in the end of the day the people who will buy your image and wanna use it somewhere they will be the final judge,if someone posted bad images or some bad image and it got accepted in SS for eg it will just stay in ss storage hd for decades  ;D
« Last Edit: October 16, 2017, 18:52 by lostintimeline »

rinderart

« Reply #32 on: October 16, 2017, 23:19 »
0
I met Mike at that 2007 seminar. He's become a friend and can tell you that he couldn't care less what you think of him or his art. And I guarantee he makes more with a camera than most people posting here.

We work together a couple times a year and are in the process of putting together a shoot right now. Anyone who's worked with him will tell you he's a great collaborator and generous with his time and expertise. He is full of ideas - some quirky, but often he gets it right on the money.

Agree.

« Reply #33 on: October 17, 2017, 11:19 »
+1
The worst photo?
Hmm if only you could see my portfolio  :-[

I'll have to mention mine. One of my earliest pics uploaded to SS in the summer of 2012. Surprised it got through when QC standards were a lot higher than they are now.

I am reuploading many photos that were rejected 5 years ago for some (obscur) reasons
All are being accepted.
And you know what? They also sell!!!

No you're wrong, it's mine.  :)

I feel like I have some value in my collection and I've resisted the urge to submit rejected images to SS. Maybe you are right, especially if they sell. I just don't care to pollute my portfolio with questionable work. I doubt that buyers notice or look, it's just my personal opinion. Some that passed are just as questionable.

Quasarphoto

  • there are no problems only solutions


« Reply #35 on: October 18, 2017, 01:44 »
0
The worst photo?
Hmm if only you could see my portfolio  :-[

I'll have to mention mine. One of my earliest pics uploaded to SS in the summer of 2012. Surprised it got through when QC standards were a lot higher than they are now.

I am reuploading many photos that were rejected 5 years ago for some (obscur) reasons
All are being accepted.
And you know what? They also sell!!!

No you're wrong, it's mine.  :)

I feel like I have some value in my collection and I've resisted the urge to submit rejected images to SS. Maybe you are right, especially if they sell. I just don't care to pollute my portfolio with questionable work. I doubt that buyers notice or look, it's just my personal opinion. Some that passed are just as questionable.
I have no shame. I don't think my port is good enough to have a brand ;-) so I doubt very much buyers "follow" me... no one really knows of course.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
4411 Views
Last post October 29, 2008, 12:58
by hali
7 Replies
7025 Views
Last post November 04, 2009, 18:18
by Fastmediamarco
12 Replies
4836 Views
Last post November 06, 2013, 05:58
by bunhill
0 Replies
2219 Views
Last post August 21, 2014, 12:42
by luissantana
7 Replies
4812 Views
Last post October 15, 2017, 08:31
by Quasarphoto

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors